Mercurial > emacs
annotate etc/GNU @ 91610:39643299db55
Some tidying post-unicode-merge: typos, tense, simplification, filling.
author | Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 07 Feb 2008 06:19:35 +0000 |
parents | 1dd7437446ea |
children | 606f2d163a64 c90853557b90 |
rev | line source |
---|---|
75343
0259a1711394
Update copyright for years from Emacs 21 to present (mainly adding
Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
parents:
68640
diff
changeset
|
1 Copyright (C) 1985, 1993, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, |
79776 | 2 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. |
26119 | 3 |
4 Permission is granted to anyone to make or distribute verbatim copies | |
5 of this document, in any medium, provided that the copyright notice and | |
6 permission notice are preserved, and that the distributor grants the | |
7 recipient permission for further redistribution as permitted by this | |
8 notice. | |
9 | |
10 Modified versions may not be made. | |
11 | |
12 The GNU Manifesto | |
13 ***************** | |
14 | |
15 The GNU Manifesto which appears below was written by Richard | |
16 Stallman at the beginning of the GNU project, to ask for | |
17 participation and support. For the first few years, it was | |
18 updated in minor ways to account for developments, but now it | |
19 seems best to leave it unchanged as most people have seen it. | |
20 | |
21 Since that time, we have learned about certain common | |
22 misunderstandings that different wording could help avoid. | |
23 Footnotes added in 1993 help clarify these points. | |
24 | |
25 For up-to-date information about the available GNU software, | |
64140 | 26 please see www.gnu.org. For software tasks to work on, see |
27 http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/tasklist. For other ways | |
28 to contribute, see http://www.gnu.org/help. | |
26119 | 29 |
30 What's GNU? Gnu's Not Unix! | |
31 ============================ | |
32 | |
33 GNU, which stands for Gnu's Not Unix, is the name for the complete | |
34 Unix-compatible software system which I am writing so that I can give it | |
35 away free to everyone who can use it.(1) Several other volunteers are | |
36 helping me. Contributions of time, money, programs and equipment are | |
37 greatly needed. | |
38 | |
39 So far we have an Emacs text editor with Lisp for writing editor | |
40 commands, a source level debugger, a yacc-compatible parser generator, | |
41 a linker, and around 35 utilities. A shell (command interpreter) is | |
42 nearly completed. A new portable optimizing C compiler has compiled | |
43 itself and may be released this year. An initial kernel exists but | |
44 many more features are needed to emulate Unix. When the kernel and | |
45 compiler are finished, it will be possible to distribute a GNU system | |
46 suitable for program development. We will use TeX as our text | |
47 formatter, but an nroff is being worked on. We will use the free, | |
48 portable X window system as well. After this we will add a portable | |
49 Common Lisp, an Empire game, a spreadsheet, and hundreds of other | |
50 things, plus on-line documentation. We hope to supply, eventually, | |
51 everything useful that normally comes with a Unix system, and more. | |
52 | |
53 GNU will be able to run Unix programs, but will not be identical to | |
54 Unix. We will make all improvements that are convenient, based on our | |
55 experience with other operating systems. In particular, we plan to | |
56 have longer file names, file version numbers, a crashproof file system, | |
57 file name completion perhaps, terminal-independent display support, and | |
58 perhaps eventually a Lisp-based window system through which several | |
59 Lisp programs and ordinary Unix programs can share a screen. Both C | |
60 and Lisp will be available as system programming languages. We will | |
61 try to support UUCP, MIT Chaosnet, and Internet protocols for | |
62 communication. | |
63 | |
64 GNU is aimed initially at machines in the 68000/16000 class with | |
65 virtual memory, because they are the easiest machines to make it run | |
66 on. The extra effort to make it run on smaller machines will be left | |
67 to someone who wants to use it on them. | |
68 | |
69 To avoid horrible confusion, please pronounce the `G' in the word | |
70 `GNU' when it is the name of this project. | |
71 | |
72 Why I Must Write GNU | |
73 ==================== | |
74 | |
75 I consider that the golden rule requires that if I like a program I | |
76 must share it with other people who like it. Software sellers want to | |
77 divide the users and conquer them, making each user agree not to share | |
78 with others. I refuse to break solidarity with other users in this | |
79 way. I cannot in good conscience sign a nondisclosure agreement or a | |
80 software license agreement. For years I worked within the Artificial | |
81 Intelligence Lab to resist such tendencies and other inhospitalities, | |
82 but eventually they had gone too far: I could not remain in an | |
83 institution where such things are done for me against my will. | |
84 | |
85 So that I can continue to use computers without dishonor, I have | |
86 decided to put together a sufficient body of free software so that I | |
87 will be able to get along without any software that is not free. I | |
88 have resigned from the AI lab to deny MIT any legal excuse to prevent | |
89 me from giving GNU away. | |
90 | |
91 Why GNU Will Be Compatible with Unix | |
92 ==================================== | |
93 | |
94 Unix is not my ideal system, but it is not too bad. The essential | |
95 features of Unix seem to be good ones, and I think I can fill in what | |
96 Unix lacks without spoiling them. And a system compatible with Unix | |
97 would be convenient for many other people to adopt. | |
98 | |
99 How GNU Will Be Available | |
100 ========================= | |
101 | |
102 GNU is not in the public domain. Everyone will be permitted to | |
103 modify and redistribute GNU, but no distributor will be allowed to | |
104 restrict its further redistribution. That is to say, proprietary | |
105 modifications will not be allowed. I want to make sure that all | |
106 versions of GNU remain free. | |
107 | |
108 Why Many Other Programmers Want to Help | |
109 ======================================= | |
110 | |
111 I have found many other programmers who are excited about GNU and | |
112 want to help. | |
113 | |
114 Many programmers are unhappy about the commercialization of system | |
115 software. It may enable them to make more money, but it requires them | |
116 to feel in conflict with other programmers in general rather than feel | |
117 as comrades. The fundamental act of friendship among programmers is the | |
118 sharing of programs; marketing arrangements now typically used | |
119 essentially forbid programmers to treat others as friends. The | |
120 purchaser of software must choose between friendship and obeying the | |
121 law. Naturally, many decide that friendship is more important. But | |
122 those who believe in law often do not feel at ease with either choice. | |
123 They become cynical and think that programming is just a way of making | |
124 money. | |
125 | |
126 By working on and using GNU rather than proprietary programs, we can | |
127 be hospitable to everyone and obey the law. In addition, GNU serves as | |
128 an example to inspire and a banner to rally others to join us in | |
129 sharing. This can give us a feeling of harmony which is impossible if | |
130 we use software that is not free. For about half the programmers I | |
131 talk to, this is an important happiness that money cannot replace. | |
132 | |
133 How You Can Contribute | |
134 ====================== | |
135 | |
136 I am asking computer manufacturers for donations of machines and | |
137 money. I'm asking individuals for donations of programs and work. | |
138 | |
139 One consequence you can expect if you donate machines is that GNU | |
140 will run on them at an early date. The machines should be complete, | |
141 ready to use systems, approved for use in a residential area, and not | |
142 in need of sophisticated cooling or power. | |
143 | |
144 I have found very many programmers eager to contribute part-time | |
145 work for GNU. For most projects, such part-time distributed work would | |
146 be very hard to coordinate; the independently-written parts would not | |
147 work together. But for the particular task of replacing Unix, this | |
148 problem is absent. A complete Unix system contains hundreds of utility | |
149 programs, each of which is documented separately. Most interface | |
150 specifications are fixed by Unix compatibility. If each contributor | |
151 can write a compatible replacement for a single Unix utility, and make | |
152 it work properly in place of the original on a Unix system, then these | |
153 utilities will work right when put together. Even allowing for Murphy | |
154 to create a few unexpected problems, assembling these components will | |
155 be a feasible task. (The kernel will require closer communication and | |
156 will be worked on by a small, tight group.) | |
157 | |
158 If I get donations of money, I may be able to hire a few people full | |
159 or part time. The salary won't be high by programmers' standards, but | |
160 I'm looking for people for whom building community spirit is as | |
161 important as making money. I view this as a way of enabling dedicated | |
162 people to devote their full energies to working on GNU by sparing them | |
163 the need to make a living in another way. | |
164 | |
165 Why All Computer Users Will Benefit | |
166 =================================== | |
167 | |
168 Once GNU is written, everyone will be able to obtain good system | |
169 software free, just like air.(2) | |
170 | |
171 This means much more than just saving everyone the price of a Unix | |
172 license. It means that much wasteful duplication of system programming | |
173 effort will be avoided. This effort can go instead into advancing the | |
174 state of the art. | |
175 | |
176 Complete system sources will be available to everyone. As a result, | |
177 a user who needs changes in the system will always be free to make them | |
178 himself, or hire any available programmer or company to make them for | |
179 him. Users will no longer be at the mercy of one programmer or company | |
180 which owns the sources and is in sole position to make changes. | |
181 | |
182 Schools will be able to provide a much more educational environment | |
183 by encouraging all students to study and improve the system code. | |
184 Harvard's computer lab used to have the policy that no program could be | |
185 installed on the system if its sources were not on public display, and | |
186 upheld it by actually refusing to install certain programs. I was very | |
187 much inspired by this. | |
188 | |
189 Finally, the overhead of considering who owns the system software | |
190 and what one is or is not entitled to do with it will be lifted. | |
191 | |
192 Arrangements to make people pay for using a program, including | |
193 licensing of copies, always incur a tremendous cost to society through | |
194 the cumbersome mechanisms necessary to figure out how much (that is, | |
195 which programs) a person must pay for. And only a police state can | |
196 force everyone to obey them. Consider a space station where air must | |
197 be manufactured at great cost: charging each breather per liter of air | |
198 may be fair, but wearing the metered gas mask all day and all night is | |
199 intolerable even if everyone can afford to pay the air bill. And the | |
200 TV cameras everywhere to see if you ever take the mask off are | |
201 outrageous. It's better to support the air plant with a head tax and | |
202 chuck the masks. | |
203 | |
204 Copying all or parts of a program is as natural to a programmer as | |
205 breathing, and as productive. It ought to be as free. | |
206 | |
207 Some Easily Rebutted Objections to GNU's Goals | |
208 ============================================== | |
209 | |
210 "Nobody will use it if it is free, because that means they can't | |
211 rely on any support." | |
212 | |
213 "You have to charge for the program to pay for providing the | |
214 support." | |
215 | |
216 If people would rather pay for GNU plus service than get GNU free | |
217 without service, a company to provide just service to people who have | |
218 obtained GNU free ought to be profitable.(3) | |
219 | |
220 We must distinguish between support in the form of real programming | |
221 work and mere handholding. The former is something one cannot rely on | |
222 from a software vendor. If your problem is not shared by enough | |
223 people, the vendor will tell you to get lost. | |
224 | |
225 If your business needs to be able to rely on support, the only way | |
226 is to have all the necessary sources and tools. Then you can hire any | |
227 available person to fix your problem; you are not at the mercy of any | |
228 individual. With Unix, the price of sources puts this out of | |
229 consideration for most businesses. With GNU this will be easy. It is | |
230 still possible for there to be no available competent person, but this | |
231 problem cannot be blamed on distribution arrangements. GNU does not | |
232 eliminate all the world's problems, only some of them. | |
233 | |
234 Meanwhile, the users who know nothing about computers need | |
235 handholding: doing things for them which they could easily do | |
236 themselves but don't know how. | |
237 | |
238 Such services could be provided by companies that sell just | |
239 hand-holding and repair service. If it is true that users would rather | |
240 spend money and get a product with service, they will also be willing | |
241 to buy the service having got the product free. The service companies | |
242 will compete in quality and price; users will not be tied to any | |
243 particular one. Meanwhile, those of us who don't need the service | |
244 should be able to use the program without paying for the service. | |
245 | |
246 "You cannot reach many people without advertising, and you must | |
247 charge for the program to support that." | |
248 | |
249 "It's no use advertising a program people can get free." | |
250 | |
251 There are various forms of free or very cheap publicity that can be | |
252 used to inform numbers of computer users about something like GNU. But | |
253 it may be true that one can reach more microcomputer users with | |
254 advertising. If this is really so, a business which advertises the | |
255 service of copying and mailing GNU for a fee ought to be successful | |
256 enough to pay for its advertising and more. This way, only the users | |
257 who benefit from the advertising pay for it. | |
258 | |
259 On the other hand, if many people get GNU from their friends, and | |
260 such companies don't succeed, this will show that advertising was not | |
261 really necessary to spread GNU. Why is it that free market advocates | |
262 don't want to let the free market decide this?(4) | |
263 | |
264 "My company needs a proprietary operating system to get a | |
265 competitive edge." | |
266 | |
267 GNU will remove operating system software from the realm of | |
268 competition. You will not be able to get an edge in this area, but | |
269 neither will your competitors be able to get an edge over you. You and | |
270 they will compete in other areas, while benefiting mutually in this | |
271 one. If your business is selling an operating system, you will not | |
272 like GNU, but that's tough on you. If your business is something else, | |
273 GNU can save you from being pushed into the expensive business of | |
274 selling operating systems. | |
275 | |
276 I would like to see GNU development supported by gifts from many | |
277 manufacturers and users, reducing the cost to each.(5) | |
278 | |
279 "Don't programmers deserve a reward for their creativity?" | |
280 | |
281 If anything deserves a reward, it is social contribution. | |
282 Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so far as society | |
283 is free to use the results. If programmers deserve to be rewarded for | |
284 creating innovative programs, by the same token they deserve to be | |
285 punished if they restrict the use of these programs. | |
286 | |
287 "Shouldn't a programmer be able to ask for a reward for his | |
288 creativity?" | |
289 | |
290 There is nothing wrong with wanting pay for work, or seeking to | |
291 maximize one's income, as long as one does not use means that are | |
292 destructive. But the means customary in the field of software today | |
293 are based on destruction. | |
294 | |
295 Extracting money from users of a program by restricting their use of | |
296 it is destructive because the restrictions reduce the amount and the | |
297 ways that the program can be used. This reduces the amount of wealth | |
298 that humanity derives from the program. When there is a deliberate | |
299 choice to restrict, the harmful consequences are deliberate destruction. | |
300 | |
301 The reason a good citizen does not use such destructive means to | |
302 become wealthier is that, if everyone did so, we would all become | |
303 poorer from the mutual destructiveness. This is Kantian ethics; or, | |
304 the Golden Rule. Since I do not like the consequences that result if | |
305 everyone hoards information, I am required to consider it wrong for one | |
306 to do so. Specifically, the desire to be rewarded for one's creativity | |
307 does not justify depriving the world in general of all or part of that | |
308 creativity. | |
309 | |
310 "Won't programmers starve?" | |
311 | |
312 I could answer that nobody is forced to be a programmer. Most of us | |
313 cannot manage to get any money for standing on the street and making | |
314 faces. But we are not, as a result, condemned to spend our lives | |
315 standing on the street making faces, and starving. We do something | |
316 else. | |
317 | |
318 But that is the wrong answer because it accepts the questioner's | |
319 implicit assumption: that without ownership of software, programmers | |
320 cannot possibly be paid a cent. Supposedly it is all or nothing. | |
321 | |
322 The real reason programmers will not starve is that it will still be | |
323 possible for them to get paid for programming; just not paid as much as | |
324 now. | |
325 | |
326 Restricting copying is not the only basis for business in software. | |
327 It is the most common basis because it brings in the most money. If it | |
328 were prohibited, or rejected by the customer, software business would | |
329 move to other bases of organization which are now used less often. | |
330 There are always numerous ways to organize any kind of business. | |
331 | |
332 Probably programming will not be as lucrative on the new basis as it | |
333 is now. But that is not an argument against the change. It is not | |
334 considered an injustice that sales clerks make the salaries that they | |
335 now do. If programmers made the same, that would not be an injustice | |
336 either. (In practice they would still make considerably more than | |
337 that.) | |
338 | |
339 "Don't people have a right to control how their creativity is | |
340 used?" | |
341 | |
342 "Control over the use of one's ideas" really constitutes control over | |
343 other people's lives; and it is usually used to make their lives more | |
344 difficult. | |
345 | |
53691
3ef78eaf5dca
Add footnote about "intellectual property rights".
Richard M. Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
parents:
26119
diff
changeset
|
346 People who have studied the issue of intellectual property rights(6) |
26119 | 347 carefully (such as lawyers) say that there is no intrinsic right to |
348 intellectual property. The kinds of supposed intellectual property | |
349 rights that the government recognizes were created by specific acts of | |
350 legislation for specific purposes. | |
351 | |
352 For example, the patent system was established to encourage | |
353 inventors to disclose the details of their inventions. Its purpose was | |
354 to help society rather than to help inventors. At the time, the life | |
355 span of 17 years for a patent was short compared with the rate of | |
356 advance of the state of the art. Since patents are an issue only among | |
357 manufacturers, for whom the cost and effort of a license agreement are | |
358 small compared with setting up production, the patents often do not do | |
359 much harm. They do not obstruct most individuals who use patented | |
360 products. | |
361 | |
362 The idea of copyright did not exist in ancient times, when authors | |
363 frequently copied other authors at length in works of non-fiction. This | |
364 practice was useful, and is the only way many authors' works have | |
365 survived even in part. The copyright system was created expressly for | |
366 the purpose of encouraging authorship. In the domain for which it was | |
367 invented--books, which could be copied economically only on a printing | |
368 press--it did little harm, and did not obstruct most of the individuals | |
369 who read the books. | |
370 | |
371 All intellectual property rights are just licenses granted by society | |
372 because it was thought, rightly or wrongly, that society as a whole | |
373 would benefit by granting them. But in any particular situation, we | |
374 have to ask: are we really better off granting such license? What kind | |
375 of act are we licensing a person to do? | |
376 | |
377 The case of programs today is very different from that of books a | |
378 hundred years ago. The fact that the easiest way to copy a program is | |
379 from one neighbor to another, the fact that a program has both source | |
380 code and object code which are distinct, and the fact that a program is | |
381 used rather than read and enjoyed, combine to create a situation in | |
382 which a person who enforces a copyright is harming society as a whole | |
383 both materially and spiritually; in which a person should not do so | |
384 regardless of whether the law enables him to. | |
385 | |
386 "Competition makes things get done better." | |
387 | |
388 The paradigm of competition is a race: by rewarding the winner, we | |
389 encourage everyone to run faster. When capitalism really works this | |
390 way, it does a good job; but its defenders are wrong in assuming it | |
391 always works this way. If the runners forget why the reward is offered | |
392 and become intent on winning, no matter how, they may find other | |
393 strategies--such as, attacking other runners. If the runners get into | |
394 a fist fight, they will all finish late. | |
395 | |
396 Proprietary and secret software is the moral equivalent of runners | |
397 in a fist fight. Sad to say, the only referee we've got does not seem | |
398 to object to fights; he just regulates them ("For every ten yards you | |
399 run, you can fire one shot"). He really ought to break them up, and | |
400 penalize runners for even trying to fight. | |
401 | |
402 "Won't everyone stop programming without a monetary incentive?" | |
403 | |
404 Actually, many people will program with absolutely no monetary | |
405 incentive. Programming has an irresistible fascination for some | |
406 people, usually the people who are best at it. There is no shortage of | |
407 professional musicians who keep at it even though they have no hope of | |
408 making a living that way. | |
409 | |
410 But really this question, though commonly asked, is not appropriate | |
411 to the situation. Pay for programmers will not disappear, only become | |
412 less. So the right question is, will anyone program with a reduced | |
413 monetary incentive? My experience shows that they will. | |
414 | |
415 For more than ten years, many of the world's best programmers worked | |
416 at the Artificial Intelligence Lab for far less money than they could | |
417 have had anywhere else. They got many kinds of non-monetary rewards: | |
418 fame and appreciation, for example. And creativity is also fun, a | |
419 reward in itself. | |
420 | |
421 Then most of them left when offered a chance to do the same | |
422 interesting work for a lot of money. | |
423 | |
424 What the facts show is that people will program for reasons other | |
425 than riches; but if given a chance to make a lot of money as well, they | |
426 will come to expect and demand it. Low-paying organizations do poorly | |
427 in competition with high-paying ones, but they do not have to do badly | |
428 if the high-paying ones are banned. | |
429 | |
430 "We need the programmers desperately. If they demand that we stop | |
431 helping our neighbors, we have to obey." | |
432 | |
433 You're never so desperate that you have to obey this sort of demand. | |
434 Remember: millions for defense, but not a cent for tribute! | |
435 | |
436 "Programmers need to make a living somehow." | |
437 | |
438 In the short run, this is true. However, there are plenty of ways | |
439 that programmers could make a living without selling the right to use a | |
440 program. This way is customary now because it brings programmers and | |
441 businessmen the most money, not because it is the only way to make a | |
442 living. It is easy to find other ways if you want to find them. Here | |
443 are a number of examples. | |
444 | |
445 A manufacturer introducing a new computer will pay for the porting of | |
446 operating systems onto the new hardware. | |
447 | |
448 The sale of teaching, hand-holding and maintenance services could | |
449 also employ programmers. | |
450 | |
62340 | 451 People with new ideas could distribute programs as freeware(7), asking |
26119 | 452 for donations from satisfied users, or selling hand-holding services. |
453 I have met people who are already working this way successfully. | |
454 | |
455 Users with related needs can form users' groups, and pay dues. A | |
456 group would contract with programming companies to write programs that | |
457 the group's members would like to use. | |
458 | |
459 All sorts of development can be funded with a Software Tax: | |
460 | |
461 Suppose everyone who buys a computer has to pay x percent of the | |
462 price as a software tax. The government gives this to an agency | |
463 like the NSF to spend on software development. | |
464 | |
465 But if the computer buyer makes a donation to software development | |
466 himself, he can take a credit against the tax. He can donate to | |
467 the project of his own choosing--often, chosen because he hopes to | |
468 use the results when it is done. He can take a credit for any | |
469 amount of donation up to the total tax he had to pay. | |
470 | |
471 The total tax rate could be decided by a vote of the payers of the | |
472 tax, weighted according to the amount they will be taxed on. | |
473 | |
474 The consequences: | |
475 | |
476 * The computer-using community supports software development. | |
477 | |
478 * This community decides what level of support is needed. | |
479 | |
480 * Users who care which projects their share is spent on can | |
481 choose this for themselves. | |
482 | |
483 In the long run, making programs free is a step toward the | |
484 post-scarcity world, where nobody will have to work very hard just to | |
485 make a living. People will be free to devote themselves to activities | |
486 that are fun, such as programming, after spending the necessary ten | |
487 hours a week on required tasks such as legislation, family counseling, | |
488 robot repair and asteroid prospecting. There will be no need to be | |
489 able to make a living from programming. | |
490 | |
491 We have already greatly reduced the amount of work that the whole | |
492 society must do for its actual productivity, but only a little of this | |
493 has translated itself into leisure for workers because much | |
494 nonproductive activity is required to accompany productive activity. | |
495 The main causes of this are bureaucracy and isometric struggles against | |
496 competition. Free software will greatly reduce these drains in the | |
497 area of software production. We must do this, in order for technical | |
498 gains in productivity to translate into less work for us. | |
499 | |
500 ---------- Footnotes ---------- | |
501 | |
502 (1) The wording here was careless. The intention was that nobody | |
503 would have to pay for *permission* to use the GNU system. But the | |
504 words don't make this clear, and people often interpret them as saying | |
505 that copies of GNU should always be distributed at little or no charge. | |
506 That was never the intent; later on, the manifesto mentions the | |
507 possibility of companies providing the service of distribution for a | |
508 profit. Subsequently I have learned to distinguish carefully between | |
509 "free" in the sense of freedom and "free" in the sense of price. Free | |
510 software is software that users have the freedom to distribute and | |
511 change. Some users may obtain copies at no charge, while others pay to | |
512 obtain copies--and if the funds help support improving the software, so | |
513 much the better. The important thing is that everyone who has a copy | |
514 has the freedom to cooperate with others in using it. | |
515 | |
516 (2) This is another place I failed to distinguish carefully between | |
517 the two different meanings of "free". The statement as it stands is | |
518 not false--you can get copies of GNU software at no charge, from your | |
519 friends or over the net. But it does suggest the wrong idea. | |
520 | |
521 (3) Several such companies now exist. | |
522 | |
62360
c38d0cd4d5c8
Correct/improve previous change.
Richard M. Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
parents:
62340
diff
changeset
|
523 (4) The Free Software Foundation raised most of its funds for 10 |
62337 | 524 years from a distribution service, although it is a charity rather |
525 than a company. | |
26119 | 526 |
62337 | 527 (5) A group of computer companies pooled funds around 1991 to |
528 support maintenance of the GNU C Compiler. | |
26119 | 529 |
53691
3ef78eaf5dca
Add footnote about "intellectual property rights".
Richard M. Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
parents:
26119
diff
changeset
|
530 (6) In the 80s I had not yet realized how confusing it was to speak |
3ef78eaf5dca
Add footnote about "intellectual property rights".
Richard M. Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
parents:
26119
diff
changeset
|
531 of "the issue" of "intellectual property". That term is obviously |
3ef78eaf5dca
Add footnote about "intellectual property rights".
Richard M. Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
parents:
26119
diff
changeset
|
532 biased; more subtle is the fact that it lumps together various |
3ef78eaf5dca
Add footnote about "intellectual property rights".
Richard M. Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
parents:
26119
diff
changeset
|
533 disparate laws which raise very different issues. Nowadays I urge |
3ef78eaf5dca
Add footnote about "intellectual property rights".
Richard M. Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
parents:
26119
diff
changeset
|
534 people to reject the term "intellectual property" entirely, lest it |
62337 | 535 lead others to suppose that those laws form one coherent issue. The way to be |
64260 | 536 clear is to discuss patents, copyrights, and trademarks separately. |
62337 | 537 See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.xhtml for more explanation |
538 of how this term spreads confusion and bias. | |
62340 | 539 |
64143 | 540 (7) Subsequently we have learned to distinguish between "free |
541 software" and "freeware". The term "freeware" means software you are | |
542 free to redistribute, but usually you are not free to study and change | |
543 the source code, so most of it is not free software. See | |
544 http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html for more | |
62360
c38d0cd4d5c8
Correct/improve previous change.
Richard M. Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
parents:
62340
diff
changeset
|
545 explanation. |