108637
|
1 NOTES ON COMMITTING TO EMACS'S BAZAAR REPO -*- outline -*-
|
|
2
|
|
3 * Install changes only on one branch, let them get merged elsewhere if needed.
|
|
4 In particular, install bug-fixes only on the release branch (if there
|
|
5 is one) and let them get synced to the trunk; do not install them by
|
|
6 hand on the trunk as well. E.g. if there is an active "emacs-23" branch
|
|
7 and you have a bug-fix appropriate for the next Emacs-23.x release,
|
|
8 install it only on the emacs-23 branch, not on the trunk as well.
|
|
9
|
|
10 Installing things manually into more than one branch makes merges more
|
|
11 difficult.
|
|
12
|
|
13 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-03/msg01124.html
|
|
14
|
|
15 * Backporting a bug-fix from the trunk to a branch (e.g. "emacs-23").
|
|
16 Label the commit as a backport, e.g. by starting the commit message with
|
|
17 "Backport:". This is helpful for the person merging the release branch
|
|
18 to the trunk.
|
|
19
|
|
20 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-05/msg00262.html
|
|
21
|
|
22 * Installing changes from your personal branches.
|
|
23 If your branch has only a single commit, or many different real
|
|
24 commits, it is fine to do a merge. If your branch has only a very
|
|
25 small number of "real" commits, but several "merge from trunks", it is
|
|
26 preferred that you take your branch's diff, apply it to the trunk, and
|
|
27 commit directly, not merge. This keeps the history cleaner.
|
|
28
|
|
29 Or use shelves; or rebase; or do something else. See the thread for
|
|
30 yet another fun excursion into the exciting world of version control.
|
|
31
|
|
32 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-04/msg00086.html
|