annotate admin/notes/cvslogs @ 92060:fd85a7810d53

Revise pdbtrack functionality to incorporate advances in python-mode.el. (I'm doing this python.el checkin with some byte-compiler warnings. These warnings existed before Nick Roberts or I applied any of the pdbtrack changes, and look very clearly like preexisting, incomplete adoption of code from python-mode.el. I'm going to next look at settling those warnings, though I don't have time for a major reconciliation of the two python-mode implementations.) (python-pdbtrack-toggle-stack-tracking): Clarify docstring. (python-pdbtrack-minor-mode-string): A sign indicating that pdb tracking is happening. (python-pdbtrack-stack-entry-regexp): Better recognize stack traces. (python-pdbtrack-input-prompt): Better recognize PDB prompts. (add python-pdbtrack-track-stack-file to comint-output-filter-functions): Tracking is plugged in to all comint buffers once python.el is loaded. (python-pdbtrack-overlay-arrow): Toggle activation of `python-pdbtrack-minor-mode-string' in addition to the overlay arrow. (python-pdbtrack-track-stack-file): Use new `python-pdbtrack-get-source-buffer' for more flexible access to debugging source files. (python-pdbtrack-get-source-buffer): Identify debugging target buffer according to pdb stack trace, optionally using new `python-pdbtrack-grub-for-buffer' if file is not locally available. (python-pdbtrack-grub-for-buffer): Find most recent python-mode named buffer, or having function with indicated name. (python-shell): Remove comint-output-filter-functions hook addition, it's being done elsewhere. Wrap long line.

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-12/msg01208.html

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: Log messages in CVS
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:06:29 +0200

I once posted a summary that I know about; see:

  http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2006-11/msg00229.html
  http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2006-11/msg00234.html
  http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2006-11/msg00312.html

Richard commented here, basically approving my summary:

  http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2006-11/msg00276.html