comparison admin/notes/copyright @ 76222:432ea336d334

*** empty log message ***

76221:3cceb2f916b0

lwlib/
rms (2007/02/17): "lwlib is not assigned to the FSF; we don't consider
it part of Emacs. [...] Therefore non-FSF copyrights are ok in lwlib."

Leave these files under GPLv1 or later.
[Note that lwlib.c and xlwmenu.c were installed in 1994 under GPLv2 or
later, but I reverted them to GPLv1 or later which I think is right
for the original lwlib/.] FIXME was this right?

FSF copyrights should only appear in files which have undergone
non-trivial cumulative changes from the original versions in the Lucid
Widget Library. NB this means that if you make non-trivial changes to
a file with no FSF copyright, you should add one. Also, if changes are

  previous version.
Done: TUTORIAL.eo


lwlib/*
  should it be under GPLv1 or later, or v2 or later?



This file is part of GNU Emacs.

76222:432ea336d334

lwlib/
rms (2007/02/17): "lwlib is not assigned to the FSF; we don't consider
it part of Emacs. [...] Therefore non-FSF copyrights are ok in lwlib."

FSF copyrights should only appear in files which have undergone
non-trivial cumulative changes from the original versions in the Lucid
Widget Library. NB this means that if you make non-trivial changes to
a file with no FSF copyright, you should add one. Also, if changes are

  previous version.
Done: TUTORIAL.eo


lwlib/*
  should it be under GPLv1 or later, or v2 or later, or some mixture?



This file is part of GNU Emacs.