comparison admin/FOR-RELEASE @ 103865:579c78c2c5d8

Clarify previous change.
author Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
date Sat, 11 Jul 2009 19:55:19 +0000
parents 09fe9897acab
children d77061bfad43
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
103864:cc83b339ea18 103865:579c78c2c5d8
17 menu has better line-breaks than the automatic version). It includes 17 menu has better line-breaks than the automatic version). It includes
18 the menu-entry name (if there is one) as well as the node name - using 18 the menu-entry name (if there is one) as well as the node name - using
19 only the latter looks better. Also, it doesn't seem to handle nested 19 only the latter looks better. Also, it doesn't seem to handle nested
20 includes, so will miss edebug.texi etc. 20 includes, so will miss edebug.texi etc.
21 21
22 Check for widow and orphan lines; make sure all the pages really look 22 Check for widow and orphan lines in the printed manual; make sure all
23 ok in the manual as formatted. (AFAIK, there is no way to do this 23 the pages really look ok in the manual as formatted. Orphans/widows
24 except paging through the whole manual.) 24 are cases where the first/last line of a paragraph is on its own at
25 the end/start of a page, or where the last word in a paragraph is on
26 its own at the start of a line. It looks better if you reword/respace
27 things to avoid these. (AFAIK, there is no way to find these except
28 paging through the whole manual.) This should be the very last thing
29 you do, since any change can alter the layout.
25 30
26 ** Regenerate the pdf versions of the reference cards in etc/refcards/. 31 ** Regenerate the pdf versions of the reference cards in etc/refcards/.
27 32
28 ** Ask maintainers of refcard translations to update them. 33 ** Ask maintainers of refcard translations to update them.
29 34