comparison lisp/mail/rmail.el @ 90185:5b029ff3b08d

Revision: [e-mail]--gnu-2005/emacs--unicode--0--patch-55 Merge from emacs--cvs-trunk--0 Patches applied: * emacs--cvs-trunk--0 (patch 320-323) - Update from CVS

90184:9e5e2f01c7ab

     ;; Using mail-strip-quoted-names is undesirable with newer mailers
     ;; since they can handle the names unstripped.
     ;; I don't know whether there are other mailers that still
     ;; need the names to be stripped.
;;;     (mail-strip-quoted-names reply-to)
     reply-to
     subject
     (rmail-make-in-reply-to-field from date message-id)
     (if just-sender
	 nil
       ;; mail-strip-quoted-names is NOT necessary for rmail-dont-reply-to

90185:5b029ff3b08d

     ;; Using mail-strip-quoted-names is undesirable with newer mailers
     ;; since they can handle the names unstripped.
     ;; I don't know whether there are other mailers that still
     ;; need the names to be stripped.
;;;     (mail-strip-quoted-names reply-to)
     ;; Remove unwanted names from reply-to, since Mail-Followup-To
     ;; header causes all the names in it to wind up in reply-to, not
     ;; in cc.  But if what's left is an empty list, use the original.
     (let* ((reply-to-list (rmail-dont-reply-to reply-to)))
       (if (string= reply-to-list "") reply-to reply-to-list))
     subject
     (rmail-make-in-reply-to-field from date message-id)
     (if just-sender
	 nil
       ;; mail-strip-quoted-names is NOT necessary for rmail-dont-reply-to