comparison lisp/progmodes/cc-engine.el @ 90737:95d0cdf160ea

Merge from emacs--devo--0 Patches applied: * emacs--devo--0 (patch 586-614) - Update from CVS - Update from erc--emacs--22 - Merge from gnus--rel--5.10 - Merge from erc--main--0 - Make byte compiler correctly write circular constants * gnus--rel--5.10 (patch 186-196) - Update from CVS - Merge from emacs--devo--0 Revision: [e-mail]/emacs--unicode--0--patch-162

90736:ef1369583937

;;; cc-engine.el --- core syntax guessing engine for CC mode

;; Copyright (C) 1985, 1987, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998,
;;   1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006  Free Software
;;   Foundation, Inc.

;; Authors:    1998- Martin Stjernholm
;;             1992-1999 Barry A. Warsaw
;;             1987 Dave Detlefs and Stewart Clamen
;;             1985 Richard M. Stallman
;; Maintainer: [e-mail]
;; Created:    22-Apr-1997 (split from cc-mode.el)

  ;; Return the position of the first argument declaration if point is
  ;; inside a K&R style argument declaration list, nil otherwise.
  ;; `c-recognize-knr-p' is not checked.  If LIM is non-nil, it's a
  ;; position that bounds the backward search for the argument list.
  ;;
  ;; Note: A declaration level context is assumed; the test can return
  ;; false positives for statements.
  ;;
  ;; This function might do hidden buffer changes.

  (save-excursion
    (save-restriction

      ;; Go back to the closest preceding normal parenthesis sexp.  We
      ;; take that as the argument list in the function header.  Then
      ;; check that it's followed by some symbol before the next ';'
      ;; or '{'.  If it does, it's the header of the K&R argdecl we're
      ;; in.
      (if lim (narrow-to-region lim (c-point 'eol)))
      (let ((outside-macro (not (c-query-macro-start)))
	    paren-end)

	(catch 'done
	  (while (if (and (setq paren-end (c-down-list-backward (point)))
			  (eq (char-after paren-end) ?\)))
		     (progn
		       (goto-char (1+ paren-end))
		       (if outside-macro
			   (c-beginning-of-macro)))
		   (throw 'done nil))))

	(and (progn
	       (c-forward-syntactic-ws)
	       (looking-at "\\w\\|\\s_"))

	     (save-excursion
	       ;; The function header in a K&R declaration should only
	       ;; contain identifiers separated by comma.  It should
	       ;; also contain at least one identifier since there
	       ;; wouldn't be anything to declare in the K&R region
	       ;; otherwise.
	       (when (c-go-up-list-backward paren-end)
		 (forward-char)
		 (catch 'knr-ok
		   (while t
		     (c-forward-syntactic-ws)
		     (if (or (looking-at c-known-type-key)
			     (looking-at c-keywords-regexp))
			 (throw 'knr-ok nil))
		     (c-forward-token-2)
		     (if (eq (char-after) ?,)
			 (forward-char)
		       (throw 'knr-ok (and (eq (char-after) ?\))
					   (= (point) paren-end))))))))

	     (save-excursion
	       ;; If it's a K&R declaration then we're now at the
	       ;; beginning of the function arglist.  Check that there
	       ;; isn't a '=' before it in this statement since that
	       ;; means it some kind of initialization instead.
	       (c-syntactic-skip-backward "^;=}{")
	       (not (eq (char-before) ?=)))

	     (point))))))

(defun c-skip-conditional ()
  ;; skip forward over conditional at point, including any predicate
  ;; statements in parentheses. No error checking is performed.
  ;;

90737:95d0cdf160ea

;;; cc-engine.el --- core syntax guessing engine for CC mode

;; Copyright (C) 1985, 1987, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998,
;;   1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007
;;   Free Software Foundation, Inc.

;; Authors:    2001- Alan Mackenzie
;;             1998- Martin Stjernholm
;;             1992-1999 Barry A. Warsaw
;;             1987 Dave Detlefs and Stewart Clamen
;;             1985 Richard M. Stallman
;; Maintainer: [e-mail]
;; Created:    22-Apr-1997 (split from cc-mode.el)

  ;; Return the position of the first argument declaration if point is
  ;; inside a K&R style argument declaration list, nil otherwise.
  ;; `c-recognize-knr-p' is not checked.  If LIM is non-nil, it's a
  ;; position that bounds the backward search for the argument list.
  ;;
  ;; Point must be within a possible K&R region, e.g. just before a top-level
  ;; "{".  It must be outside of parens and brackets.  The test can return
  ;; false positives otherwise.
  ;;
  ;; This function might do hidden buffer changes.

  (save-excursion
    (save-restriction
      ;; If we're in a macro, our search range is restricted to it.  Narrow to
      ;; the searchable range.
      (let* ((macro-start (c-query-macro-start))
	     (lim (max (or lim (point-min)) (or macro-start (point-min))))
	     before-lparen after-rparen)
	(narrow-to-region lim (c-point 'eol))

	;; Search backwards for the defun's argument list.  We give up if we
	;; encounter a "}" (end of a previous defun) or BOB.
	;;
	;; The criterion for a paren structure being the arg list is:
	;; o - there is non-WS stuff after it but before any "{"; AND
	;; o - the token after it isn't a ";" AND
	;; o - it is preceded by either an identifier (the function name) or
	;;   a macro expansion like "DEFUN (...)"; AND
	;; o - its content is a non-empty comma-separated list of identifiers
	;;   (an empty arg list won't have a knr region).
	;;
	;; The following snippet illustrates these rules:
	;; int foo (bar, baz, yuk)
	;;     int bar [] ;
	;;     int (*baz) (my_type) ;
	;;     int (*) (void) (*yuk) (void) ;
	;; {

	(catch 'knr
	  (while t ; go round one paren/bracket construct each time round.
	    (or (c-syntactic-skip-backward "^)]}")
		(throw 'knr nil))	; no more bpb pairs left.
	    (cond ((eq (char-before) ?\))
		   (setq after-rparen (point)))
		  ((eq (char-before) ?\})
		   (throw 'knr nil))
		  (t (setq after-rparen nil))) ; "]"

	    (if after-rparen
	    ;; We're inside a paren.  Could it be our argument list....?
	      (if
		  (and
		   (progn
		     (goto-char after-rparen)
		     (unless (c-go-list-backward) (throw 'knr nil)) ;
		;; FIXME!!!  What about macros between the parens?  2007/01/20
		     (setq before-lparen (point)))

		   ;; It can't be the arg list if next token is ; or {
		   (progn (goto-char after-rparen)
			  (c-forward-syntactic-ws)
			  (not (memq (char-after) '(?\; ?\{))))

		   ;; Is the thing preceding the list an identifier (the
		   ;; function name), or a macro expansion?
		   (progn
		     (goto-char before-lparen)
		     (eq (c-backward-token-2) 0)
		     (or (c-on-identifier)
			 (and (eq (char-after) ?\))
			      (c-go-up-list-backward)
			      (eq (c-backward-token-2) 0)
			      (c-on-identifier))))

		   ;; Have we got a non-empty list of comma-separated
		   ;; identifiers?
		   (progn
		     (goto-char before-lparen)
		     (c-forward-token-2) ; to first token inside parens
		     (and
		      (c-on-identifier)
		      (c-forward-token-2)
		      (catch 'id-list
			(while (eq (char-after) ?\,)
			  (c-forward-token-2)
			  (unless (c-on-identifier) (throw 'id-list nil))
			  (c-forward-token-2))
			(eq (char-after) ?\))))))

		  ;; ...Yes.  We've identified the function's argument list.
		  (throw 'knr
		       (progn (goto-char after-rparen)
			      (c-forward-syntactic-ws)
			      (point)))

		;; ...No.  The current parens aren't the function's arg list.
		(goto-char before-lparen))

	      (or (c-go-list-backward)	; backwards over [ .... ]
		  (throw 'knr nil)))))))))

(defun c-skip-conditional ()
  ;; skip forward over conditional at point, including any predicate
  ;; statements in parentheses. No error checking is performed.
  ;;