Mercurial > emacs

comparison admin/notes/copyright @ 75653:a19b06431362

Find changesets by keywords (author, files, the commit message), revision number or hash, or revset expression.
*** empty log message ***
author Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
date Sat, 03 Feb 2007 21:55:10 +0000
parents ed3fe3b8b73e
children 53b659cf6a99
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
75652:bd6d4488b990 75653:a19b06431362
176 176
177 177
178 admin/check-doc-strings 178 admin/check-doc-strings
179 Author is Martin Buchholz, but no assignment from him on file, and 179 Author is Martin Buchholz, but no assignment from him on file, and
180 rms has no way to reach him. 180 rms has no way to reach him.
181 admin/make-announcement - no copyright 181 [FIXED admin/make-announcement - no copyright]
182 admin/nt/makedist.bat - no copyright (author andrewi@gnu.org? mail sent) 182 [FIXED admin/nt/makedist.bat - no copyright]
183 etc/ms-kermit - no copyright, but ms-7bkermit has one 183 etc/ms-kermit - no copyright, but ms-7bkermit has one
184 etc/e/eterm-color.ti - no copyright 184 etc/e/eterm-color.ti - no copyright
185 rms: "I think that is not copyrightable under the merger doctrine 185 rms: "I think that is not copyrightable under the merger doctrine
186 because the entries are all forced. At least that is the case in the 186 because the entries are all forced. At least that is the case in the
187 US; I am not sure whether we can rely on that in general." 187 US; I am not sure whether we can rely on that in general."
193 etc/gnus-refcard.tex 193 etc/gnus-refcard.tex
194 I (rgm) think the "Gnus Bugfixing Girls + Boys" copyright should 194 I (rgm) think the "Gnus Bugfixing Girls + Boys" copyright should
195 probably be removed, but it may be ok (waiting for rms) 195 probably be removed, but it may be ok (waiting for rms)
196 196
197 197
198 [etc/orgcard.tex, orgcard.ps] 198 [REMOVED etc/orgcard.tex, orgcard.ps]
199 Re-add these files if an assignment is received from Rooke. 199 Re-add these files if an assignment is received from Rooke.
200 200
201 201
202 etc/sk-refcard.ps, pl-refcard.ps, cs-refcard.ps 202 etc/sk-refcard.ps, pl-refcard.ps, cs-refcard.ps
203 These refcards need to be regenerated (by those with suitable TeX 203 These refcards need to be regenerated (by those with suitable TeX
230 - add standard notices to any decided to be non-trivial. 230 - add standard notices to any decided to be non-trivial.
231 231
232 232
233 msdos/is_exec.c, sigaction.c 233 msdos/is_exec.c, sigaction.c
234 - do we need to add COPYING.LIB (because COPYING.DJ refers to it)? 234 - do we need to add COPYING.LIB (because COPYING.DJ refers to it)?
235 relicense under the GPL? 235 can we relicense under the GPL? Do these contradict?
236 236
237 237
238 oldXMenu/ 238 oldXMenu/
239 - should there be any FSF copyrights at all in here? Some were added 239 - should there be any FSF copyrights at all in here? Some were added
240 in 2005, without licence notices. Was this right? 240 in 2005, without licence notices. Was this right?