Mercurial > emacs

comparison admin/FOR-RELEASE @ 94293:ca9efc5939fc

Find changesets by keywords (author, files, the commit message), revision number or hash, or revset expression.
Merge from emacs--rel--22 Revision: emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-1121
author Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
date Wed, 23 Apr 2008 05:55:42 +0000
parents ad7043127f4d 00c883800b9c
children 00021417bce1
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
94292:f07af351ed0b 94293:ca9efc5939fc
50 ** undefined reference getopt_long 50 ** undefined reference getopt_long
51 Report by Daniel C. Bastos <dbast0s@yahoo.com.br> on bug-gnu-emacs 51 Report by Daniel C. Bastos <dbast0s@yahoo.com.br> on bug-gnu-emacs
52 from 2007-08-27. Impossible to procede without more input from OP (as 52 from 2007-08-27. Impossible to procede without more input from OP (as
53 of 20070912, emails are bouncing) or someone else who can reproduce this. 53 of 20070912, emails are bouncing) or someone else who can reproduce this.
54 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-08/msg01497.html 54 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-08/msg01497.html
55
56 ** emacs-22.1 with GTK problems (with patches)
57 Only outstanding issue seems to be whether Solaris 2.6 GTK can be
58 supported in the absence of recursive mutexes, via a change to
59 alloc.c, or whether configure should abort.
60 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2007-09/msg00055.html
61 55
62 * BUGS 56 * BUGS
63 57
64 ** Does deleting frames run Lisp code? If so, can we get rid of that? 58 ** Does deleting frames run Lisp code? If so, can we get rid of that?
65 It is a dangerous design. 59 It is a dangerous design.