comparison lisp/mail/undigest.el @ 78558:ce34261da54f

(rmail-digest-parse-rfc1153sloppy): Be even sloppier, for the sake of GNU Mailman. (rmail-digest-rfc1153): Initialize `result' correctly.

78557:7f509b9f0ead

  "Parse using the method defined in RFC 1153, allowing for some sloppiness.
See rmail-digest-methods."
 (rmail-digest-rfc1153
  "^-\\{55,\\}\n\n"
  "^\n-\\{27,\\}\n\n"
  "^\n-\\{27,\\}\n\nEnd of"))

(defun rmail-digest-rfc1153 (prolog-sep message-sep trailer-sep)
  (goto-char (point-min))
  (when (re-search-forward prolog-sep nil t)
    ;; Ok, prolog separator found
    (let ((start (make-marker))
	  (end (make-marker))
	  separator result)
      (move-marker start (match-beginning 0))
      (move-marker end (match-end 0))
      (setq result (cons (copy-marker start) (copy-marker end t)))
      (when (re-search-forward message-sep nil t)
	;; Ok, at least one message separator found
	(setq separator (match-string 0))
	(when (re-search-forward trailer-sep nil t)
	  ;; Wonderful, we found a trailer, too.  Now, go on splitting

78558:ce34261da54f

  "Parse using the method defined in RFC 1153, allowing for some sloppiness.
See rmail-digest-methods."
 (rmail-digest-rfc1153
  "^-\\{55,\\}\n\n"
  "^\n-\\{27,\\}\n\n"
  ;; GNU Mailman knowingly (see comment at line 353 of ToDigest.py in
  ;; Mailman source) produces non-conformant rfc 1153 digests, in that
  ;; the trailer contains a "digest footer" like this:
  ;; _______________________________________________
  ;; <one or more lines of list blurb>
  ;;
  ;; End of Foo Digest...
  ;; **************************************
  "^\nEnd of"))

(defun rmail-digest-rfc1153 (prolog-sep message-sep trailer-sep)
  (goto-char (point-min))
  (when (re-search-forward prolog-sep nil t)
    ;; Ok, prolog separator found
    (let ((start (make-marker))
	  (end (make-marker))
	  separator result)
      (move-marker start (match-beginning 0))
      (move-marker end (match-end 0))
      (setq result (list (cons (copy-marker start) (copy-marker end t))))
      (when (re-search-forward message-sep nil t)
	;; Ok, at least one message separator found
	(setq separator (match-string 0))
	(when (re-search-forward trailer-sep nil t)
	  ;; Wonderful, we found a trailer, too.  Now, go on splitting