comparison lisp/gud.el @ 8322:faedd07b38ed

(dbx): Use system-configuration, not system-type.
author Richard M. Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
date Sun, 24 Jul 1994 20:01:13 +0000
parents 1eb5638ab4b5
children 8217ec286828
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
8321:ee7b758d2efa 8322:faedd07b38ed
633 "\C-b" "Set breakpoint at current line.") 633 "\C-b" "Set breakpoint at current line.")
634 (gud-def gud-finish "return" "\C-f" "Finish executing current function.") 634 (gud-def gud-finish "return" "\C-f" "Finish executing current function.")
635 ;; Make dbx give out the source location info that we need. 635 ;; Make dbx give out the source location info that we need.
636 (process-send-string (get-buffer-process gud-comint-buffer) 636 (process-send-string (get-buffer-process gud-comint-buffer)
637 "printf \"\032\032%1d:\",$curline;file\n")) 637 "printf \"\032\032%1d:\",$curline;file\n"))
638 ((or (string-match "-sunos" (symbol-name system-type)) 638 ((or (string-match "-sunos" system-configuration)
639 (string-match "-solaris" (symbol-name system-type))) 639 (string-match "-solaris" system-configuration))
640 ;; The following works for both the UCB and SunPro 2.0.1 versions 640 ;; The following works for both the UCB and SunPro 2.0.1 versions
641 ;; of dbx. The `stop' is lost using the `\n' separator as in the 641 ;; of dbx. The `stop' is lost using the `\n' separator as in the
642 ;; default case. Is there a dbx where the newline is actually 642 ;; default case. Is there a dbx where the newline is actually
643 ;; necessary? (d.love@dl.ac.uk) 643 ;; necessary? (d.love@dl.ac.uk)
644 (gud-def gud-break "file \"%d%f\";stop at %l" 644 (gud-def gud-break "file \"%d%f\";stop at %l"