diff man/basic.texi @ 90100:72cf6261961e

Revision: [e-mail]--gnu-2005/emacs--unicode--0--patch-11 Merge from emacs--cvs-trunk--0 Patches applied: * [e-mail]--gnu-2005/emacs--cvs-trunk--0--patch-69 - [e-mail]--gnu-2005/emacs--cvs-trunk--0--patch-71 Update from CVS * [e-mail]--gnu-2005/emacs--cvs-trunk--0--patch-72 src/dispextern.h (xassert): Enable unconditionally. * [e-mail]--gnu-2005/emacs--cvs-trunk--0--patch-73 - [e-mail]--gnu-2005/emacs--cvs-trunk--0--patch-81 Update from CVS * [e-mail]--gnu-2005/emacs--cvs-trunk--0--patch-82 Merge from gnus--rel--5.10 * [e-mail]--gnu-2005/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-12 Merge from emacs--cvs-trunk--0 * [e-mail]--gnu-2005/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-13 Update from CVS

--- a/man/basic.texi	Wed Feb 02 01:54:00 2005 +0000
+++ b/man/basic.texi	Sun Feb 06 12:06:02 2005 +0000
@@ -400,7 +400,7 @@
   Regardless of the values of those variables, the most recent change
 is never discarded unless it gets bigger than @code{undo-outer-limit}
 (normally 3,000,000).  At that point, Emacs discards the undo data and
-warns you about it.  This is the only situation in which you can not
+warns you about it.  This is the only situation in which you cannot
 undo the last command.  If this happens, you can increase the value of
 @code{undo-outer-limit} to make it even less likely to happen in the
 future.  But if you didn't expect the command to create such large