Mercurial > emacs
diff lisp/reposition.el @ 14169:83f275dcd93a
Update FSF's address.
| author | Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no> |
|---|---|
| date | Sun, 14 Jan 1996 07:34:30 +0000 |
| parents | cc7cd83ccf3f |
| children | 11218164bc54 |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/lisp/reposition.el Sat Jan 13 00:38:41 1996 +0000 +++ b/lisp/reposition.el Sun Jan 14 07:34:30 1996 +0000 @@ -19,22 +19,23 @@ ;; GNU General Public License for more details. ;; You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License -;; along with GNU Emacs; see the file COPYING. If not, write to -;; the Free Software Foundation, 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. +;; along with GNU Emacs; see the file COPYING. If not, write to the +;; Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, +;; Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. ;;; Commentary: -;;; Reposition-window makes an entire function definition or comment visible, -;;; or, if it is already visible, places it at the top of the window; -;;; additional invocations toggle the visibility of comments preceding the -;;; code. For the gory details, see the documentation for reposition-window; -;;; rather than reading that, you may just want to play with it. +;; Reposition-window makes an entire function definition or comment visible, +;; or, if it is already visible, places it at the top of the window; +;; additional invocations toggle the visibility of comments preceding the +;; code. For the gory details, see the documentation for reposition-window; +;; rather than reading that, you may just want to play with it. -;;; This tries pretty hard to do the recentering correctly; the precise -;;; action depends on what the buffer looks like. If you find a situation -;;; where it doesn't behave well, let me know. This function is modeled -;;; after one of the same name in ZMACS, but the code is all-new and the -;;; behavior in some situations differs. +;; This tries pretty hard to do the recentering correctly; the precise +;; action depends on what the buffer looks like. If you find a situation +;; where it doesn't behave well, let me know. This function is modeled +;; after one of the same name in ZMACS, but the code is all-new and the +;; behavior in some situations differs. ;;; Code: