Mercurial > emacs
view etc/CENSORSHIP @ 83542:2d56e13fd23d
Merged from emacs@sv.gnu.org
Patches applied:
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-413
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-414
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-415
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-416
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-417
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-418
Merge from gnus--rel--5.10
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-419
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-420
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-421
Merge from gnus--rel--5.10
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-422
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-423
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-424
Merge from gnus--rel--5.10
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-425
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-426
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-427
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-428
Merge from gnus--rel--5.10
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-429
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-430
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-431
Merge from gnus--rel--5.10
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-432
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-433
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-434
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-435
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-436
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-437
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-438
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-439
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-440
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-441
lisp/url/url-methods.el: Fix format error when http_proxy is empty string
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-442
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-443
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-444
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-445
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-446
Merge from gnus--rel--5.10
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-447
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-448
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-449
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-450
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-451
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-452
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-453
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-454
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-455
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-456
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-457
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-458
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-459
Merge from gnus--rel--5.10
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-460
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-461
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-462
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-463
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-464
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-465
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-466
Merge from gnus--rel--5.10
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-467
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-468
Merge from gnus--rel--5.10
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-469
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-470
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-471
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-472
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/emacs--devo--0--patch-473
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-128
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-129
Merge from emacs--devo--0
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-130
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-131
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-132
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-133
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-134
Merge from emacs--devo--0
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-135
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-136
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-137
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-138
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-139
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-140
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-141
Merge from emacs--devo--0
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-142
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-143
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-144
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-145
Merge from emacs--devo--0
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-146
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-147
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-148
Update from CVS
* emacs@sv.gnu.org/gnus--rel--5.10--patch-149
Update from CVS
git-archimport-id: lorentey@elte.hu--2004/emacs--multi-tty--0--patch-582
author | Karoly Lorentey <lorentey@elte.hu> |
---|---|
date | Sat, 14 Oct 2006 17:36:28 +0000 |
parents | 632018b817e3 |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
Censoring my Software Richard Stallman [From Datamation, 1 March 1996] Last summer, a few clever legislators proposed a bill to "prohibit pornography" on the Internet. Last fall, right-wing Christians made this cause their own. Last week, President Clinton signed the bill, and we lost the freedom of the press for the public library of the future. This week, I'm censoring GNU Emacs. No, GNU Emacs does not contain pornography. It is a software package, an award-winning extensible and programmable text editor. But the law that was passed applies to far more than pornography. It prohibits "indecent" speech, which can include anything from famous poems, to masterpieces hanging in the Louvre, to advice about safe sex...to software. Naturally, there was a lot of opposition to this bill. Not only from people who use the Internet, and people who appreciate erotica, but from everyone who cares about freedom of the press. But every time we tried to tell the public what was at stake, the forces of censorship responded with a lie: they told the public that the issue was simply pornography. By embedding this lie as a presupposition in their statements about the issue, they succeeded in misinforming the public. So here I am, censoring my software. You see, Emacs contains a version of the famous "doctor program", a.k.a. Eliza, originally developed by Professor Weizenbaum at MIT. This is the program that imitates a Rogerian psychotherapist. The user talks to the program, and the program responds--by playing back the user's own statements, and by recognizing a long list of particular words. The Emacs doctor program was set up to recognize many common curse words, and respond with an appropriately cute message such as, "Would you please watch your tongue?" or "Let's not be vulgar." In order to do this, it had to have a list of curse words. That means the source code for the program was indecent. Because of the censorship law, I had to remove this feature. (I replaced it with a message announcing that the program has been censored for your protection.) The new version of the doctor doesn't recognize the indecent words. If you curse at it, it curses right back to you--for lack of knowing better. Now that people are facing the threat of two years in prison for indecent network postings, it would be helpful if they could access precise rules via the Internet for how to avoid imprisonment. However, this is impossible. The rules would have to mention the forbidden words, so posting them on the Internet would be against the rules. Of course, I'm making an assumption about just what "indecent" means. I have to do this, because nobody knows for sure. The most obvious possible meaning is the meaning it has for television, so I'm using that as a tentative assumption. However, there is a good chance that our courts will reject that interpretation of the law as unconstitutional. We can hope that the courts will recognize the Internet as a medium of publication like books and magazines. If they do, they will entirely reject any law prohibiting "indecent" publications on the Internet. What really worries me is that the courts might take a muddled in-between escape route--by choosing another interpretation of "indecent", one that permits the doctor program or a statement of the decency rules, but prohibits some of the books that children can browse through in the public library and the bookstore. Over the years, as the Internet replaces the public library and the bookstore, some of our freedom of the press will be lost. Just a few weeks ago, another country imposed censorship on the Internet. That was China. We don't think well of China in this country--its government doesn't respect basic freedoms. But how well does our government respect them? And do you care enough to preserve them here? If you care, stay in touch with the Voters Telecommunications Watch. Look in their Web site http://www.vtw.org/ for background information and political action recommendations. Censorship won in February, but we can beat it in November. Copyright 1996 Richard Stallman Verbatim copying and distribution is permitted in any medium provided this notice is preserved.