view etc/future-bug @ 55421:5be9c6254f06

2004-05-07 Kai Grossjohann <kai@emptydomain.de> Version 2.0.40 of Tramp released. 2004-04-25 Michael Albinus <Michael.Albinus@alcatel.de> Complete rework, based on review by Karl Berry <karl@gnu.org>. * tramp.texi (Auto-save and Backup): Explain exploitation of new variables `tramp-backup-directory-alist' and `tramp-bkup-backup-directory-info'. (Overview, Connection types) (External transfer methods, Default Method) (Windows setup hints): Remove restriction of password entering with external methods. (Auto-save and Backup): Make file name example (X)Emacs neutral. In case of XEmacs, `bkup-backup-directory-info' and `auto-save-directory' must be used. (Frequently Asked Questions): Use "MS Windows NT/2000/XP" (not only "NT"). Remove doubled entry "What kinds of systems does @tramp{} work on". (tramp): Macro removed. (Obtaining Tramp): Flag removed from title. (all): "tramp-" and "-" removed from flag names. Flags `tramp' and `trampver' used properly. Flag `tramp-inst' replaced by `installchapter'. Installation related text adapted.
author Kai Großjohann <kgrossjo@eu.uu.net>
date Fri, 07 May 2004 21:21:04 +0000
parents 23a1cea22d13
children 02e2382f5e8a
line wrap: on
line source

Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2199 21:03:50 -0600
From: Karl Fogel <kfogel@floss.cyclic.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs@prep.ai.mit.edu
Subject: M-x search-backward-in-time broken...
X-Windows: you'll envy the dead.

In GNU Emacs 51.70.4 (i9986-unknown-linux-gnu, X toolkit) of Sat Feb  20 2199 on floss
configured using `configure  --with-x-toolkit=yes'

        The `search-backward-in-time' function appears to be broken in
Emacs 51.70.

        Unfortunately, I can never seem to start the debugger early
enough to catch the error as it happens.  However I have traced the
problem through source by eye, and it looks like `time-forward' can't
handle negative arguments anymore.  This is consistent with other
symptoms: for example, `undo' (which since 51.25 has worked by passing
a negative arg to `time-forward') is also broken.  However, `do' still
works -- it seems that `time-forward' continues to handle positive
arguments just fine.

        No one here-and-now can figure out how to fix the problem,
because the code for `time-forward' is so hairy.  We're using M-x
report-future-emacs-bug to request that you folks include more
comments when you write it (sometime in 2198 as I recall).

        Thanks!

-Karl Fogel   <kfogel@red-bean.com>


P.S. You'll be pleased to know that since (time-forward N) still works
     for N >= 0, we've used it to pre-emptively update configure.in.
     Emacs now configures and builds on every platform that will ever
     be made.  It wasn't easy, but at least that's one problem out of
     the way for good.  If you'd like the patch, just ask.