Mercurial > emacs
view admin/notes/commits @ 107828:6d3accd249f7
Use XFT in Lucid dialogs if available.
* xmenu.c (apply_systemfont_to_dialog): New.
(create_and_show_dialog): Call apply_systemfont_to_dialog if HAVE_XFT.
* lwlib-Xaw.c (widget_xft_data): New for Xft data.
(fill_xft_data, openFont, get_text_width_and_height)
(draw_text, set_text, find_xft_data, command_press)
(command_reset): New functions.
(xaw_update_one_widget): Call set_text for dialog and buttons
if HAVE_XFT. Also set internalHeight for buttons.
(xaw_destroy_instance): Free all Xft related data.
(button_actions, buttonTrans): New structures.
(make_dialog): Call XtAppAddActions for button_actions.
Find xft font to use and call fill_xft_data for widgets.
(xaw_create_dialog): Pass instance parameter to make_dialog.
* lwlib-int.h (_widget_instance): Add Xft data if HAVE_XFT.
Override translations for buttons. If depth is 16 or more, tell
Xaw3d to not be nice to colormap.
Remove separator widget, use XtNhorizDistance on first right button
instead.
* xresources.texi (Lucid Resources): Mention faceName for dialogs.
author | Jan D. <jan.h.d@swipnet.se> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:26:13 +0200 |
parents | 36d0fedf13ca |
children | 4e1df9366cdd a5eeeb631d8a |
line wrap: on
line source
HOW TO COMMIT CHANGES TO EMACS Most of these points are from: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2009-03/msg00555.html From: Miles Bader Subject: commit style redux Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:21:20 +0900 (0) Each commit should correspond to a single change (whether spread over multiple files or not). Do not mix different changes in the same commit (eg adding a feature in one file, fixing a bug in another should be two commits, not one). (1) Commit all changed files at once with a single log message (which in CVS will result in an identical log message for all committed files), not one-by-one. This is pretty easy using vc-dir now. (2) Make the log message describe the entire changeset, perhaps including relevant changelog entiries (I often don't bother with the latter if it's a trivial sort of change). Many modern source-control systems vaguely distinguish the first line of the log message to use as a short summary for abbreviated history listing (in arch this was explicitly called the summary, but many other systems have a similar concept). So it's nice if you can format the log entry like: SHORTISH ONE-LINE SUMMARY MULTIPLE-LINE DETAILED DESCRIPTION POSSIBLY INCLUDING (OR CONSISTING OF) CHANGELOG ENTRIES [Even with CVS this style is useful, because web CVS browsing interfaces often include the first N words of the log message of the most recent commit as a short "most recent change" description.] (3) Don't phrase log messages assuming the filename is known, because in non-file-oriented systems (everything modern other than CVS), the log listing tends to be treated as global information, and the connection with specific files is less explicit. For instance, currently I often see log messages like "Regenerate"; for modern source-control systems with a global log, it's better to have something like "Regenerate configure". Followup discussion: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-01/msg00897.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-02/msg00401.html PREVIOUS GUIDELINES FOR CVS For historical interest only, here is the old-style advice for CVS logs: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-12/msg01208.html From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: Log messages in CVS Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:06:29 +0200