Mercurial > emacs
view admin/notes/commits @ 107733:84b961690802
Remove support for DJGPP v1.x (bug#5813).
src/:
w16select.c (__dpmi_int): Remove DJGPP v1.x compatibility.
s/msdos.h:
unexec.c (make_hdr, copy_text_and_data):
sysdep.c (wait_for_termination, sys_subshell):
msdos.c (dos_set_window_size, msdos_set_cursor_shape)
(IT_set_terminal_modes):
(__write, _rename, gethostname, gettimeofday, alarm, fork, kill)
(dos_ttraw, dos_ttcooked, run_msdos_command, abort): Remove DJGPP
v1.x code and tests of the value of __DJGPP__.
(nice, pause, sigsetmask, sigblock): Remove DJGPP v1.x
compatibility code.
lread.c:
gmalloc.c (memalign):
fileio.c (Fcopy_file, check_executable, Ffile_modes):
emacs.c (main):
dosfns.c (init_dosfns):
dired.c (file_name_completion_stat): Remove tests of __DJGPP__.
msdos/:
sed3.inp:
sed2.inp:
sed1.inp:
mainmake: Files removed.
author | Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:59:46 +0300 |
parents | 36d0fedf13ca |
children | 4e1df9366cdd a5eeeb631d8a |
line wrap: on
line source
HOW TO COMMIT CHANGES TO EMACS Most of these points are from: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2009-03/msg00555.html From: Miles Bader Subject: commit style redux Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:21:20 +0900 (0) Each commit should correspond to a single change (whether spread over multiple files or not). Do not mix different changes in the same commit (eg adding a feature in one file, fixing a bug in another should be two commits, not one). (1) Commit all changed files at once with a single log message (which in CVS will result in an identical log message for all committed files), not one-by-one. This is pretty easy using vc-dir now. (2) Make the log message describe the entire changeset, perhaps including relevant changelog entiries (I often don't bother with the latter if it's a trivial sort of change). Many modern source-control systems vaguely distinguish the first line of the log message to use as a short summary for abbreviated history listing (in arch this was explicitly called the summary, but many other systems have a similar concept). So it's nice if you can format the log entry like: SHORTISH ONE-LINE SUMMARY MULTIPLE-LINE DETAILED DESCRIPTION POSSIBLY INCLUDING (OR CONSISTING OF) CHANGELOG ENTRIES [Even with CVS this style is useful, because web CVS browsing interfaces often include the first N words of the log message of the most recent commit as a short "most recent change" description.] (3) Don't phrase log messages assuming the filename is known, because in non-file-oriented systems (everything modern other than CVS), the log listing tends to be treated as global information, and the connection with specific files is less explicit. For instance, currently I often see log messages like "Regenerate"; for modern source-control systems with a global log, it's better to have something like "Regenerate configure". Followup discussion: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-01/msg00897.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-02/msg00401.html PREVIOUS GUIDELINES FOR CVS For historical interest only, here is the old-style advice for CVS logs: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-12/msg01208.html From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: Log messages in CVS Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:06:29 +0200