view etc/future-bug @ 39150:a56fcade3c7e

(Help, mainline code): Add new option -L FILE. (Copyright): Update year. (LANG, LANGUAGE, LC_ALL, LC_COLLATE, LC_CTYPE, LC_MESSAGES, LC_NUMERIC, LC_TIME): New shell vars, to make sure we live in the C locale. (mainline code): Handle nonstandard -u option differently, by transforming it to standard form. Check for "Working file: ", not "Working file:". Allow file names with spaces. (SOH, rlogfile): New shell vars. (rlogout): Remove. Its old functionality is mostly migrated to rlogfile. Append ';;' to the last arm of every case statement, for portability to ancient broken BSD shells. (logins): Fix bug; was not being computed at all, lowering performance. (pository): New var. This fixes some bugs where repositories are remote, or have trailing slashes. (authors): $llogout is never an empty shell var, so don't worry about that possibility. (printlogline, mainline code): Fix bug with SOH's being put into the output.
author Paul Eggert <eggert@twinsun.com>
date Wed, 05 Sep 2001 23:07:46 +0000
parents 03ddf0b96330
children 23a1cea22d13
line wrap: on
line source

Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2199 21:03:50 -0600
From: Karl Fogel <kfogel@floss.cyclic.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs@prep.ai.mit.edu
Subject: M-x search-backward-in-time broken...
X-Windows: you'll envy the dead.

In GNU Emacs 51.70.4 (i9986-unknown-linux-gnu, X toolkit) of Sat Feb  20 2199 on floss
configured using `configure  --with-x-toolkit=yes'

        The `search-backward-in-time' function appears to be broken in
Emacs 51.70.  

        Unfortunately, I can never seem to start the debugger early
enough to catch the error as it happens.  However I have traced the
problem through source by eye, and it looks like `time-forward' can't
handle negative arguments anymore.  This is consistent with other
symptoms: for example, `undo' (which since 51.25 has worked by passing
a negative arg to `time-forward') is also broken.  However, `do' still
works -- it seems that `time-forward' continues to handle positive
arguments just fine.

        No one here-and-now can figure out how to fix the problem,
because the code for `time-forward' is so hairy.  We're using M-x
report-future-emacs-bug to request that you folks include more
comments when you write it (sometime in 2198 as I recall).

        Thanks!

-Karl Fogel   <kfogel@red-bean.com>


P.S. You'll be pleased to know that since (time-forward N) still works
     for N >= 0, we've used it to pre-emptively update configure.in.
     Emacs now configures and builds on every platform that will ever
     be made.  It wasn't easy, but at least that's one problem out of
     the way for good.  If you'd like the patch, just ask.