# HG changeset patch # User Juri Linkov # Date 1121149118 0 # Node ID 118ee9a8f53ac1138f13a306bbf88e0cdd669081 # Parent f334c0e6d54e4bcade48dcd0d430b7b200990384 Fix typos. diff -r f334c0e6d54e -r 118ee9a8f53a man/gnu.texi --- a/man/gnu.texi Tue Jul 12 06:16:38 2005 +0000 +++ b/man/gnu.texi Tue Jul 12 06:18:38 2005 +0000 @@ -382,13 +382,13 @@ difficult. People who have studied the issue of intellectual property -rights@footnote{n the 80s I had not yet realized how confusing it was +rights@footnote{In the 80s I had not yet realized how confusing it was to speak of ``the issue'' of ``intellectual property.'' That term is obviously biased; more subtle is the fact that it lumps together various disparate laws which raise very different issues. Nowadays I urge people to reject the term ``intellectual property'' entirely, lest it lead others to suppose that those laws form one coherent -issue. The way to be clear is to to discuss patents, copyrights, and +issue. The way to be clear is to discuss patents, copyrights, and trademarks separately. See @uref{http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.xhtml} for more explanation of how this term spreads confusion and bias.} carefully