# HG changeset patch # User Glenn Morris # Date 1170299057 0 # Node ID 68a42f7eeb1f78f9ca3f88c1923645bf5f82958e # Parent c2f2782910c3237681a934fa9c3ce55535e550cf *** empty log message *** diff -r c2f2782910c3 -r 68a42f7eeb1f admin/notes/copyright --- a/admin/notes/copyright Thu Feb 01 01:46:58 2007 +0000 +++ b/admin/notes/copyright Thu Feb 01 03:04:17 2007 +0000 @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ src/gmalloc.c - contains numerous copyrights from the GNU C library. Leave them alone. -[src/unexhp9k800.c - removed 2007/1/27 +[src/unexhp9k800.c - removed 2007/1/27] [src/m/sr2k.h - removed 2007/1/27] - First file removed due to legal uncertainties; second file removed due to dependency on first. Note that src/m/hp800.h is still needed on @@ -135,11 +135,15 @@ Is it OK to just `cvs remove' a file for legal reasons, or is something more drastic needed? A removed file is still available from CVS, if suitable options are applied. + rms: will ask lawyer All README (and other such files) that are non-trivial and were added by Emacs developers need copyright statements and copying permissions to be added. + lisp/term/README (author)? + etc/BABYL? + borderline "trivial" cases...? All images files that allow for comments should have copyright and @@ -158,7 +162,7 @@ Author is Martin Buchholz, but no assignment from him on file, and rms has no way to reach him. admin/make-announcement - no copyright -admin/nt/makedist.bat - no copyright +admin/nt/makedist.bat - no copyright (author andrewi@gnu.org? mail sent) etc/ms-kermit - no copyright, but ms-7bkermit has one etc/e/eterm-color.ti - no copyright rms: "I think that is not copyrightable under the merger doctrine @@ -188,6 +192,9 @@ Arnold as the starting point. However, it may be that we need to get and insert whatever his license was for his code." + - 1984 version of ctags, with no copyright, posted to net.sources: + http://groups.google.com/group/net.sources/msg/a21b6c21be12a98d + lispref/back.texi, elisp-covers.texi, lay-flat.texi, two-volume-cross-refs.txt, two.el