changeset 61596:164ca32df6ab

(Indirect Buffers): Clarify.
author Richard M. Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
date Sun, 17 Apr 2005 15:50:48 +0000
parents 60e0429c79b1
children bebf790f4c99
files lispref/buffers.texi
diffstat 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) [+]
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/lispref/buffers.texi	Sun Apr 17 15:49:52 2005 +0000
+++ b/lispref/buffers.texi	Sun Apr 17 15:50:48 2005 +0000
@@ -1067,11 +1067,11 @@
 themselves.
 
   In all other respects, the indirect buffer and its base buffer are
-completely separate.  They have different names, different values of
-point, different narrowing, different markers and overlays (though
+completely separate.  They have different names, independent values of
+point, independent narrowing, independent markers and overlays (though
 inserting or deleting text in either buffer relocates the markers and
-overlays for both), different major modes, and different buffer-local
-variables.
+overlays for both), independent major modes, and independent
+buffer-local variable bindings.
 
   An indirect buffer cannot visit a file, but its base buffer can.  If
 you try to save the indirect buffer, that actually saves the base