Mercurial > emacs
changeset 45512:17fef404cef1
(c-add-stmt-syntax): Fixed some cases of wrong anchoring, e.g. for
else-if compounds.
author | Martin Stjernholm <mast@lysator.liu.se> |
---|---|
date | Sat, 25 May 2002 16:17:27 +0000 |
parents | e27a1854f55c |
children | 878a4fae5e98 |
files | lisp/progmodes/cc-engine.el |
diffstat | 1 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/lisp/progmodes/cc-engine.el Sat May 25 11:26:14 2002 +0000 +++ b/lisp/progmodes/cc-engine.el Sat May 25 16:17:27 2002 +0000 @@ -2333,24 +2333,14 @@ (setq savepos (point) step-type step-tmp)) - ;; Skip over any comments that stands between the statement and - ;; boi. If stop-at-boi-only is nil and we're not at boi after - ;; this, then we're done. - (while (and (/= (setq savepos (point)) boi) - (c-forward-comment -1)) - (setq at-comment t - boi (c-point 'boi))) - (goto-char savepos) - - (when (or stop-at-boi-only - (= (point) boi)) - (catch 'done + (catch 'done ;; Loop if we have to back out of the containing block. (while (progn ;; Loop if we have to back up another statement. (while (progn + ;; Always start by skipping over any comments that ;; stands between the statement and boi. (while (and (/= (setq savepos (point)) boi) @@ -2358,26 +2348,47 @@ (setq at-comment t boi (c-point 'boi))) (goto-char savepos) - (and (or at-comment - (eq step-type 'label) - (/= savepos boi)) - (progn - ;; Current position not good enough; skip - ;; backward another statement. - (setq stop-at-boi-only t - step-type (c-beginning-of-statement-1 - containing-sexp)) - ;; Record this a substatement if we skipped - ;; up one level, but not if we're still on - ;; the same line. This so e.g. a sequence - ;; of "else if" clauses won't indent deeper - ;; and deeper. - (when (and (eq step-type 'up) - (< (point) boi)) - (setcdr syms-tail (list 'substatement)) - (setq syms-tail (cdr syms-tail))) - (setq boi (c-point 'boi)) - (/= (point) savepos)))) + + (and + (or at-comment + (eq step-type 'label) + (/= savepos boi)) + + (progn + ;; Current position might not be good enough; + ;; skip backward another statement. + (setq step-type (c-beginning-of-statement-1 + containing-sexp)) + + (if (and (not stop-at-boi-only) + (/= savepos boi) + (memq step-type '(up previous))) + ;; If stop-at-boi-only is nil, we shouldn't + ;; back up over previous or containing + ;; statements to try to reach boi, so go + ;; back to the last position and exit. + (progn + (goto-char savepos) + nil) + (if (and (not stop-at-boi-only) + (memq step-type '(up previous beginning))) + ;; If we've moved into another statement + ;; then we should no longer try to stop + ;; after boi. + (setq stop-at-boi-only t)) + + ;; Record this a substatement if we skipped up + ;; one level, but not if we're still on the + ;; same line. This so e.g. a sequence of "else + ;; if" clauses won't indent deeper and deeper. + (when (and (eq step-type 'up) + (< (point) boi)) + (setcdr syms-tail (list 'substatement)) + (setq syms-tail (cdr syms-tail))) + + (setq boi (c-point 'boi)) + (/= (point) savepos))))) + (setq savepos (point) at-comment nil)) (setq at-comment nil) @@ -2389,10 +2400,8 @@ paren-state) containing-sexp (c-most-enclosing-brace paren-state)) - (when (and (prog1 - (eq prev-paren ?{) - (setq prev-paren (char-after))) - (eq prev-paren ?\()) + + (when (eq (setq prev-paren (char-after)) ?\() (c-backward-syntactic-ws containing-sexp) (when (c-on-identifier) ;; Arrived at a function arglist start. Exit with @@ -2433,9 +2442,11 @@ ;; we're at now is found to be good enough in ;; the loop above. (setq step-type nil)) - (setq stop-at-boi-only t - boi (c-point 'boi))))) - )))) + (if (and (not stop-at-boi-only) + (memq step-type '(up previous beginning))) + (setq stop-at-boi-only t)) + (setq boi (c-point 'boi))))) + ))) (while syms (c-add-syntax (car syms) (point))