Mercurial > emacs
changeset 36388:5835d43dcf93
(Bug Criteria): Reword a sentence.
author | Gerd Moellmann <gerd@gnu.org> |
---|---|
date | Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:12:28 +0000 |
parents | 1a1c42cf437f |
children | 6dadbe31111f |
files | man/trouble.texi |
diffstat | 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/man/trouble.texi Mon Feb 26 00:21:47 2001 +0000 +++ b/man/trouble.texi Mon Feb 26 10:12:28 2001 +0000 @@ -388,15 +388,16 @@ then it might actually be working right. Rather than jumping to conclusions, show the problem to someone who knows for certain. - Finally, a command's intended definition may not be best for editing -with. This is a very important sort of problem, but it is also a matter of -judgment. Also, it is easy to come to such a conclusion out of ignorance -of some of the existing features. It is probably best not to complain -about such a problem until you have checked the documentation in the usual -ways, feel confident that you understand it, and know for certain that what -you want is not available. If you are not sure what the command is -supposed to do after a careful reading of the manual, check the index and -glossary for any terms that may be unclear. + Finally, a command's intended definition may not be the best +possible definition for editing with. This is a very important sort +of problem, but it is also a matter of judgment. Also, it is easy to +come to such a conclusion out of ignorance of some of the existing +features. It is probably best not to complain about such a problem +until you have checked the documentation in the usual ways, feel +confident that you understand it, and know for certain that what you +want is not available. If you are not sure what the command is +supposed to do after a careful reading of the manual, check the index +and glossary for any terms that may be unclear. If after careful rereading of the manual you still do not understand what the command should do, that indicates a bug in the manual, which