Mercurial > emacs
changeset 75956:6ef0c279b18c
Comment changes and clarifications.
author | Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:12:59 +0000 |
parents | afdba90b563a |
children | 3afb5c2e237e |
files | lib-src/emacsclient.c |
diffstat | 1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/lib-src/emacsclient.c Fri Feb 16 16:35:39 2007 +0000 +++ b/lib-src/emacsclient.c Fri Feb 16 17:12:59 2007 +0000 @@ -484,13 +484,45 @@ if (filename[0] == '\0') return FALSE; #ifdef WINDOWSNT - /* X:\xxx is always absolute; X:xxx is an error and will fail. */ + /* X:\xxx is always absolute. */ if (isalpha (filename[0]) && filename[1] == ':' && (filename[2] == '\\' || filename[2] == '/')) return TRUE; /* Both \xxx and \\xxx\yyy are absolute. */ if (filename[0] == '\\') return TRUE; + + /* + FIXME: There's a corner case not dealt with, "x:y", where: + + 1) x is a valid drive designation (usually a letter in the A-Z range) + and y is a path, relative to the current directory on drive x. This + is absolute, *after* fixing the y part to include the current + directory in x. + + 2) x is a relative file name, and y is an NTFS stream name. This is a + correct relative path, but it is very unusual. + + The trouble is that first case items are also valid examples of the + second case, i.e., "c:test" can be understood as drive:path or as + file:stream. + + The "right" fix would involve checking whether + - the current drive/partition is NTFS, + - x is a valid (and accesible) drive designator, + - x:y already exists as a file:stream in the current directory, + - y already exists on the current directory of drive x, + - the auspices are favorable, + and then taking an "informed decision" based on the above. + + Whatever the result, Emacs currently does a very bad job of dealing + with NTFS file:streams: it cannot visit them, and the only way to + create one is by setting `buffer-file-name' to point to it (either + manually or with emacsclient). So perhaps resorting to 1) and ignoring + 2) for now is the right thing to do. + + Anyway, something to decide After the Release. + */ #endif return FALSE; @@ -884,7 +916,7 @@ { HMODULE hUser32; - /* It should'nt happen when dealing with TCP sockets. */ + /* It shouldn't happen when dealing with TCP sockets. */ if (!emacs_pid) return; if (!(hUser32 = LoadLibrary ("user32.dll"))) return;