Mercurial > emacs
changeset 105396:7f82f9367cd1
(rmail-generate-viewer-buffer): Be more careful about reusing existing
buffers, in case we happen to visit two files with the same basename.
(Bug#4593)
author | Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> |
---|---|
date | Sat, 03 Oct 2009 02:07:28 +0000 |
parents | 175a7f7ac069 |
children | 31fd98c59048 |
files | lisp/ChangeLog lisp/mail/rmail.el |
diffstat | 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/lisp/ChangeLog Fri Oct 02 19:53:53 2009 +0000 +++ b/lisp/ChangeLog Sat Oct 03 02:07:28 2009 +0000 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +2009-10-03 Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> + + * mail/rmail.el (rmail-generate-viewer-buffer): Be more careful about + reusing existing buffers, in case we happen to visit two files with the + same basename. (Bug#4593) + 2009-10-02 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> * makefile.w32-in (update-subdirs-CMD): Add cedet to
--- a/lisp/mail/rmail.el Fri Oct 02 19:53:53 2009 +0000 +++ b/lisp/mail/rmail.el Sat Oct 03 02:07:28 2009 +0000 @@ -1294,11 +1294,15 @@ (defun rmail-generate-viewer-buffer () "Return a reusable buffer suitable for viewing messages. Create the buffer if necessary." - (let* ((suffix (file-name-nondirectory (or buffer-file-name (buffer-name)))) - (name (format " *message-viewer %s*" suffix)) - (buf (get-buffer name))) - (or buf - (generate-new-buffer name)))) + ;; We want to reuse any existing view buffer, so as not to create an + ;; endless number of them. But we must avoid clashes if we visit + ;; two different rmail files with the same basename (Bug#4593). + (if (and (local-variable-p 'rmail-view-buffer) + (buffer-live-p rmail-view-buffer)) + rmail-view-buffer + (generate-new-buffer + (format " *message-viewer %s*" + (file-name-nondirectory (or buffer-file-name (buffer-name))))))) (defun rmail-swap-buffers () "Swap text between current buffer and `rmail-view-buffer'. @@ -1367,6 +1371,9 @@ (set-buffer-multibyte nil) (with-current-buffer (setq rmail-view-buffer (rmail-generate-viewer-buffer)) (setq buffer-undo-list t) + ;; Note that this does not erase the buffer. Should it? + ;; It depends on how this is called. If somehow called with the + ;; rmail buffers swapped, it would erase the message collection. (set (make-local-variable 'rmail-overlay-list) nil) (set-buffer-multibyte t) ;; Force C-x C-s write Unix EOLs.