Mercurial > emacs
changeset 3681:94593e8e6593
Initial revision
| author | Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| date | Sat, 12 Jun 1993 15:37:36 +0000 |
| parents | 6c88b630141b |
| children | 2a4e19efe862 |
| files | src/s/usg5-4-2.h |
| diffstat | 1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/src/s/usg5-4-2.h Sat Jun 12 15:37:36 1993 +0000 @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +/* s/ file for System V release 4.2. */ + +#include "usg5-4.h" + +/* pcg@aber.ac.uk says this is useless since fork does copy-on-write + #define HAVE_VFORK */ +/* fnf@cygnus.com says these exist. */ +#define HAVE_TCATTR +#define HAVE_GETHOSTNAME +#if 0 /* autoconf should take care of this. */ +#define HAVE_RANDOM +#endif +/* #define HAVE_GETWD (appears to be buggy on SVR4.2) */ + +/* Info from fnf@cygnus.com suggests this is appropriate. */ +#define POSIX_SIGNALS + +/* We don't need the definition from usg5-3.h with POSIX_SIGNALS. */ +#undef sigsetmask +#undef HAVE_SYSV_SIGPAUSE + +/* This is the same definition as in usg5-4.h, but with sigblock/sigunblock + rather than sighold/sigrelse, which appear to be BSD4.1 specific and won't + work if POSIX_SIGNALS is defined. It may also be appropriate for SVR4.x + (x<2) but I'm not sure. fnf@cygnus.com */ +/* This sets the name of the slave side of the PTY. On SysVr4, + grantpt(3) forks a subprocess, so keep sigchld_handler() from + intercepting that death. If any child but grantpt's should die + within, it should be caught after sigrelse(2). */ + +#undef PTY_TTY_NAME_SPRINTF +#define PTY_TTY_NAME_SPRINTF \ + { \ + char *ptsname(), *ptyname; \ + \ + sigblock(sigmask(SIGCLD)); \ + if (grantpt(fd) == -1) \ + fatal("could not grant slave pty"); \ + sigunblock(sigmask(SIGCLD)); \ + if (unlockpt(fd) == -1) \ + fatal("could not unlock slave pty"); \ + if (!(ptyname = ptsname(fd))) \ + fatal ("could not enable slave pty"); \ + strncpy(pty_name, ptyname, sizeof(pty_name)); \ + pty_name[sizeof(pty_name) - 1] = 0; \ + }