Mercurial > emacs
changeset 70576:97c00016e50b
(Writing Emacs Primitives): Clarify GCPRO rules.
author | Richard M. Stallman <rms@gnu.org> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 11 May 2006 00:59:35 +0000 |
parents | aaf48e9df47b |
children | bee281cd9295 |
files | lispref/internals.texi |
diffstat | 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/lispref/internals.texi Wed May 10 21:31:09 2006 +0000 +++ b/lispref/internals.texi Thu May 11 00:59:35 2006 +0000 @@ -615,32 +615,37 @@ values. They have types @code{int} and @w{@code{Lisp_Object *}}. Within the function @code{For} itself, note the use of the macros -@code{GCPRO1} and @code{UNGCPRO}. @code{GCPRO1} is used to ``protect'' -a variable from garbage collection---to inform the garbage collector that -it must look in that variable and regard its contents as an accessible -object. This is necessary whenever you call @code{Feval} or anything -that can directly or indirectly call @code{Feval}. At such a time, any -Lisp object that you intend to refer to again must be protected somehow. -@code{UNGCPRO} cancels the protection of the variables that are -protected in the current function. It is necessary to do this explicitly. +@code{GCPRO1} and @code{UNGCPRO}. @code{GCPRO1} is used to +``protect'' a variable from garbage collection---to inform the garbage +collector that it must look in that variable and regard its contents +as an accessible object. GC protection is necessary whenever you call +@code{Feval} or anything that can directly or indirectly call +@code{Feval}. At such a time, any Lisp object that this function may +refer to again must be protected somehow. It suffices to ensure that at least one pointer to each object is -GC-protected; as long as the object is not recycled, all pointers to -it remain valid. So if you are sure that a local variable points to -an object that will be preserved by some other pointer, that local -variable does not need a @code{GCPRO}. (Formerly, strings were an -exception to this rule; in older Emacs versions, every pointer to a -string needed to be marked by GC.) +GC-protected; that way, the object cannot be recycled, so all pointers +to it remain valid. Thus, a particular local variable can do without +protection if it is certain that the object it points to will be +preserved by some other pointer (such as another local variable which +has a @code{GCPRO})@footnote{Formerly, strings were a special +exception; in older Emacs versions, every local variable that might +point to a string needed a @code{GCPRO}.}. Otherwise, the local +variable needs a @code{GCPRO}. The macro @code{GCPRO1} protects just one local variable. If you -want to protect two, use @code{GCPRO2} instead; repeating -@code{GCPRO1} will not work. Macros, @code{GCPRO3}, @code{GCPRO4}, -@code{GCPRO5}, and @code{GCPRO6} also exist. These macros implicitly -use local variables such as @code{gcpro1}; you must declare these -explicitly, with type @code{struct gcpro}. Thus, if you use +want to protect two variables, use @code{GCPRO2} instead; repeating +@code{GCPRO1} will not work. Macros @code{GCPRO3}, @code{GCPRO4}, +@code{GCPRO5}, and @code{GCPRO6} also exist. All these macros +implicitly use local variables such as @code{gcpro1}; you must declare +these explicitly, with type @code{struct gcpro}. Thus, if you use @code{GCPRO2}, you must declare @code{gcpro1} and @code{gcpro2}. Alas, we can't explain all the tricky details here. + @code{UNGCPRO} cancels the protection of the variables that are +protected in the current function. It is necessary to do this +explicitly. + Built-in functions that take a variable number of arguments actually accept two arguments at the C level: the number of Lisp arguments, and a @code{Lisp_Object *} pointer to a C vector containing those Lisp