Mercurial > emacs
changeset 44873:a3601f81ab2a
New file with information for Emacs pretesters.
author | Pavel Janík <Pavel@Janik.cz> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 26 Apr 2002 06:22:40 +0000 |
parents | 9247dfe141e4 |
children | 88f95f59bbe4 |
files | admin/emacs-pretesters |
diffstat | 1 files changed, 440 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/admin/emacs-pretesters Fri Apr 26 06:22:40 2002 +0000 @@ -0,0 +1,440 @@ +Here are the guidelines for being an Emacs pretester. +If you would like to do this, say so, and I'll add you to +the pretest list. + + + Information for Emacs Pretesters + +The purpose of Emacs pretesting is to verify that the new Emacs +distribution, about to be released, works properly on your system *with +no change whatever*, when installed following the precise +recommendations that come with the Emacs distribution. + +Here are some guidelines on how to do pretesting so as to make it +helpful. All of them follow from common sense together with the +nature of the purpose and the situation. + +Please save this file, and reread it when a new series of pretests +starts. + +* Get the pretest from gnu/emacs/emacs-MM.NN.tar.gz and +gnu/emacs/leim-MM.NN.tar.gz on alpha.gnu.org. + +* After a few days of testing, if there are no problems, please report +that Emacs works for you and what configuration you are testing it on. + +* If you want to communicate with other pretesters, send mail to +emacs-pretesters@gnu.org. I don't use that mailing list when I send +to you because I've found that mailing lists tend to amplify random +noise into long discussions or even arguments, and that can waste a +lot of time. But when you have a reason to ask other pretesters for +help, you can do it that way. + +* It is absolutely vital that you tell me about even the smallest +change or departure from the standard sources and procedure. + +Otherwise, you are not testing the same program that I asked you to +test. Testing a different program is usually of no use whatever. It +can even cause trouble if you fail to tell me that you tested some +other program instead of what I am about to release. I might think +that Emacs works, when in fact it has not even been tried, and might +have a glaring fault. + +* Don't use a site-load.el file or a site-init.el file when you pretest. +Using either of those files means you are not testing Emacs as a typical +site would use it. + +Actually, it does no harm to test Emacs with such customizations *as +well as* testing it "out of the box". Anything you do that could find +a bug is useful, as long as you make sure I know exactly what you did. +The important point is that testing with local changes is no +substitute for testing Emacs exactly as it is distributed. + +* Even changing the compilation options counts as a change in the +program. The Emacs sources specify which compilation options to use. +Some of them are specified in makefiles, and some in machine-specific +configuration files. They also give you ways to override this--but if +you do, then you are not testing what ordinary users will do. +Therefore, when pretesting, it is vital to test with the default +compilation options. + +(Testing with a different set of options can be useful *in addition*, +but not *instead of* the default options.) + +* The machine and system configuration files of Emacs are parts of +Emacs. So when you test Emacs, you need to do it with the +configuration files that come with Emacs. + +If Emacs does not come with configuration files for a certain machine, +and you test it with configuration files that don't come with Emacs, +this is effectively changing Emacs. Because the crucial fact about +the planned release is that, without changes, it doesn't work on that +machine. + +To make Emacs work on that machine, I would need to install new +configuration files. That is not out of the question, since it is +safe--it certainly won't break any other machines that already work. +But you will have to rush me the legal papers to give the FSF +permission to use such a large piece of text. + +* Look in the etc/MACHINES file. + +The etc/MACHINES file says which configuration files to use for your +machine, so use the ones that are recommended. If you guess, you might +guess wrong and encounter spurious difficulties. What's more, if you +don't follow etc/MACHINES then you aren't helping to test that its +recommendations are valid. + +The etc/MACHINES file may describe other things that you need to do +to make Emacs work on your machine. If so, you should follow these +recommendations also, for the same reason. + +* Send your problem reports to emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, not +bug-gnu-emacs. + +Sometimes I won't know what to do about a system-dependent issue, and +I may need people to tell me what happens if you try a certain thing +on a certain system. When this happens, I'll send out a query. + +* Don't delay sending information. + +When you test on a system and encounter no problems, please tell me +about it right away. That way, I will know that someone has tested +Emacs on that kind of system. + +Please don't wait for several days "to see if it really works before +you say anything." Tell me right away that Emacs seems basically to +work; then, if you notice a problem a few days later, tell me +immediately about that when you see it. + +It is okay if you double check things before reporting a problem, such +as to see if you can easily fix it. But don't wait very long. A good +rule to use in pretesting is always to tell me about every problem on +the same day you encounter it, even if that means you can't find a +solution before you report the problem. + +I'd much rather hear about a problem today and a solution tomorrow +than get both of them tomorrow at the same time. + +* Make each bug report self-contained. + +If you refer back to another message, whether from you or from someone +else, then it will be necessary for anyone who wants to investigate +the bug to find the other message. This may be difficult, it is +probably time-consuming. + +To help me save time, simply copy the relevant parts of any previous +messages into your own bug report. + +In particular, if I ask you for more information because a bug report +was incomplete, it is best to send me the *entire* collection of +relevant information, all together. If you send just the additional +information, that makes me do extra work. There is even a risk that +I won't remember what question you are sending me the answer to. + +* When you encounter a bug that manifests itself as a Lisp error, +try setting debug-on-error to t and making the bug happen again. +Then you will get a Lisp backtrace. Including that in your bug report +is very useful. + +* Debugging optimized code is possible, if you compile with GCC, but +in some cases the optimized code can be confusing. If you are not +accustomed to that, recompile Emacs without -O. One way to do this is + + make clean + make CFLAGS=-g + +* If you use X windows, it is a good idea to run Emacs under GDB (or +some other suitable debugger) *all the time*, at least while +pretesting. + +Then, when Emacs crashes, you will be able to debug the live process, +not just a core dump. The `pr' command defined in src/.gdbinit is very +useful in this case for examining Lisp_Object values as they would +appear in Lisp. + +If you can't use `pr' because Emacs has got a fault already, or +because you have only a core dump, you can use `xtype' to look at the +type of a value, and then choose one of the other commands `xsymbol', +`xstring', `xcons', `xvector' and so on to examine the contents. + +I myself *always* run Emacs under GDB so that I can debug conveniently +if the occasion arises. + +* To get Lisp-level backtrace information within GDB, +look for stack frames that call Ffuncall. Select them one by one in GDB +and type this: + + p *args + pr + +This will print the name of the Lisp function called by that level +of function calling. + +By printing the remaining elements of args, you can see the argument +values. Here's how to print the first argument: + + p args[1] + pr + +If you do not have a live process, you can use xtype and the other +x... commands such as xsymbol to get such information, albeit less +conveniently. + +* Even with a live process, these x... commands are useful for +examining the fields in a buffer, window, process, frame or marker. +Here's an example using concepts explained in the node "Value History" +of the GDB manual to print the variable frame from this line in +xmenu.c: + + buf.frame_or_window = Fcons (frame, prefix); + +First, use these commands: + + cd src + gdb emacs + b xmenu.c:1209 + r -q + +Then type C-x 5 2 to create a new frame, and it hits the breakpoint: + + (gdb) p frame + $1 = 1077872640 + (gdb) xtype + Lisp_Vectorlike + PVEC_FRAME + (gdb) xframe + $2 = (struct frame *) 0x3f0800 + (gdb) p *$ + $3 = { + size = 536871989, + next = 0x366240, + name = 809661752, + [...] + } + (gdb) p $3->name + $4 = 809661752 + +Now we can use `pr' to print the name of the frame: + + (gdb) pr + "emacs@steenrod.math.nwu.edu" + +* The Emacs C code heavily uses macros defined in lisp.h. So suppose +we want the address of the l-value expression near the bottom of +`kbd_buffer_store_event' from keyboard.c: + + XVECTOR (kbd_buffer_frame_or_window)->contents[kbd_store_ptr + - kbd_buffer] + = event->frame_or_window); + +XVECTOR is a macro, and therefore GDB does not know about it. +GDB cannot evaluate p XVECTOR (kbd_buffer_frame_or_window). + +However, you can use the xvector command in GDB to get the same +result. Here is how: + + (gdb) p kbd_buffer_frame_or_window + $1 = 1078005760 + (gdb) xvector + $2 = (struct Lisp_Vector *) 0x411000 + 0 + (gdb) p $->contents[kbd_store_ptr - kbd_buffer] + $3 = 1077872640 + (gdb) p &$ + $4 = (int *) 0x411008 + +* Here's a related example of macros and the GDB `define' command. +There are many Lisp vectors such as `recent_keys', which contains the +last 100 keystrokes. We can print this Lisp vector + +p recent_keys +pr + +But this may be inconvenient, since `recent_keys' is much more verbose +than `C-h l'. We might want to print only the last 10 elements of +this vector. `recent_keys' is updated in keyboard.c by the command + + XVECTOR (recent_keys)->contents[recent_keys_index] = c; + +So we define a GDB command `xvector-elts', so the last 10 keystrokes +are printed by + + xvector-elts recent_keys recent_keys_index 10 + +where you can define xvector-elts as follows: + + define xvector-elts + set $i = 0 + p $arg0 + xvector + set $foo = $ + while $i < $arg2 + p $foo->contents[$arg1-($i++)] + pr + end + document xvector-elts + Prints a range of elements of a Lisp vector. + xvector-elts v n i + prints `i' elements of the vector `v' ending at the index `n'. + end + +* To debug what happens while preloading and dumping Emacs, +do `gdb temacs' and start it with `r -batch -l loadup dump'. + +If temacs actually succeeds when running under GDB in this way, do not +try to run the dumped Emacs, because it was dumped with the GDB +breakpoints in it. + +* If you encounter X protocol errors, try evaluating (x-synchronize t). +That puts Emacs into synchronous mode, where each Xlib call checks for +errors before it returns. This mode is much slower, but when you get +an error, you will see exactly which call really caused the error. + +* If the symptom of the bug is that Emacs fails to respond, don't +assume Emacs is `hung'--it may instead be in an infinite loop. To +find out which, make the problem happen under GDB and stop Emacs once +it is not responding. (If Emacs is using X Windows directly, you can +stop Emacs by typing C-z at the GDB job.) Then try stepping with +`step'. If Emacs is hung, the `step' command won't return. If it is +looping, `step' will return. + +If this shows Emacs is hung in a system call, stop it again and +examine the arguments of the call. In your bug report, state exactly +where in the source the system call is, and what the arguments are. + +If Emacs is in an infinite loop, please determine where the loop +starts and ends. The easiest way to do this is to use the GDB command +`finish'. Each time you use it, Emacs resumes execution until it +exits one stack frame. Keep typing `finish' until it doesn't +return--that means the infinite loop is in the stack frame which you +just tried to finish. + +Stop Emacs again, and use `finish' repeatedly again until you get back +to that frame. Then use `next' to step through that frame. By +stepping, you will see where the loop starts and ends. Also please +examine the data being used in the loop and try to determine why the +loop does not exit when it should. Include all of this information in +your bug report. + +* If certain operations in Emacs are slower than they used to be, here +is some advice for how to find out why. + +Stop Emacs repeatedly during the slow operation, and make a backtrace +each time. Compare the backtraces looking for a pattern--a specific +function that shows up more often than you'd expect. + +If you don't see a pattern in the C backtraces, get some Lisp +backtrace information by looking at Ffuncall frames (see above), and +again look for a pattern. + +When using X, you can stop Emacs at any time by typing C-z at GDB. +When not using X, you can do this with C-g. + +* Configure tries to figure out what kind of system you have by +compiling and linking programs which calls various functions and looks +at whether that succeeds. The file config.log contains any messages +produced by compilers while running configure, to aid debugging if +configure makes a mistake. But note that config.cache reads: + +# Giving --cache-file=/dev/null disables caching, for debugging configure. + +or more simply, + +rm config.cache +./configure + +* Always be precise when talking about changes you have made. Show +things rather than describing them. Use exact filenames (relative to +the main directory of the distribution), not partial ones. For +example, say "I changed Makefile" rather than "I changed the +makefile". Instead of saying "I defined the MUMBLE macro", send a +diff. + +* Always use `diff -c' to make diffs. If you don't include context, it +may be hard for me to figure out where you propose to make the +changes. So I might have to ignore your patch. + +* When you write a fix, keep in mind that I can't install a change +that *might* break other systems without the risk that it will fail to +work and therefore require an additional cycle of pretesting. + +People often suggest fixing a problem by changing config.h or +src/ymakefile or even src/Makefile to do something special that a +particular system needs. Sometimes it is totally obvious that such +changes would break Emacs for almost all users. I can't possibly make +a change like that. All I can do is send it back to you and ask you +to find a fix that is safe to install. + +Sometimes people send fixes that *might* be an improvement in +general--but it is hard to be sure of this. I can install such +changes some of the time, but not during pretest, when I am trying to +get a new version to work reliably as quickly as possible. + +The safest changes for me to install are changes to the s- and m- +files. At least I know those can't affect most systems. + +Another safe kind of change is one that uses a conditional to make +sure it will apply only to a particular kind of system. Ordinarily, +that is a bad way to solve a problem, and I would want to find a +cleaner alternative. But the virtue of safety can make it superior at +pretest time. + +* Don't try changing Emacs *in any way* unless it fails to work unchanged. + +* Don't even suggest changes to add features or make something +cleaner. Every change I install could introduce a bug, so I won't +install a change during pretest unless I see it is *necessary*. + +* If you would like to suggest changes for purposes other than fixing +user-visible bugs, don't wait till pretest time. Instead, send them +after I have made a release that proves to be stable. Then I can give +your suggestions proper consideration. If you send them at pretest +time, I will have to defer them till later, and that might mean I +forget all about them. + +* In some cases, if you don't follow these guidelines, your +information might still be useful, but I might have to do more work to +make use of it. Unfortunately, I am so far behind in my work that I +just can't keep up unless you help me to do it efficiently. + +Some suggestions for debugging on MS Windows: + + Marc Fleischeuers, Geoff Voelker and Andrew Innes + +To debug emacs with Microsoft Visual C++, you either start emacs from +the debugger or attach the debugger to a running emacs process. To +start emacs from the debugger, you can use the file bin/debug.bat. The +Microsoft Developer studio will start and under Project, Settings, +Debug, General you can set the command-line arguments and emacs' +startup directory. Set breakpoints (Edit, Breakpoints) at Fsignal and +other functions that you want to examine. Run the program (Build, +Start debug). Emacs will start and the debugger will take control as +soon as a breakpoint is hit. + +You can also attach the debugger to an already running emacs process. +To do this, start up the Microsoft Developer studio and select Build, +Start debug, Attach to process. Choose the emacs process from the +list. Send a break to the running process (Debug, Break) and you will +find that execution is halted somewhere in user32.dll. Open the stack +trace window and go up the stack to w32_msg_pump. Now you can set +breakpoints in emacs (Edit, Breakpoints). Continue the running emacs +process (Debug, Step out) and control will return to emacs, until a +breakpoint is hit. + +To examine the contents of a lisp variable, you can use the function +'debug_print'. Right-click on a variable, select QuickWatch, and +place 'debug_print(' and ')' around the expression. Press +'Recalculate' and the output is sent to the 'Debug' pane in the Output +window. If emacs was started from the debugger, a console window was +opened at emacs' startup; this console window also shows the output of +'debug_print'. It is also possible to keep appropriately masked and +typecast lisp symbols in the Watch window, this is more convenient +when steeping though the code. For instance, on entering +apply_lambda, you can watch (struct Lisp_Symbol *) (0xfffffff & +args[0]). + + +Local Variables: +mode: text +End: