Mercurial > emacs
changeset 110074:ad9b8f76c61d
message.texi: Fix some syntax errors in the last check-in; by Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>.
| author | Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org> |
|---|---|
| date | Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:30:11 +0000 |
| parents | 38805092633e |
| children | 9ef61fac0063 |
| files | doc/misc/message.texi |
| diffstat | 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/doc/misc/message.texi Tue Aug 31 23:26:23 2010 +0000 +++ b/doc/misc/message.texi Tue Aug 31 23:30:11 2010 +0000 @@ -192,26 +192,26 @@ It's complicated to explain, but it's easy to use. -For instance, if you get an email from @samp{foo@example.org}, but -@samp{foo@zot.example.org} is also in the @code{Cc} list, then your +For instance, if you get an email from @samp{foo@@example.org}, but +@samp{foo@@zot.example.org} is also in the @code{Cc} list, then your wide reply will go out to both these addresses, since they are unique. To avoid this, do something like the following: -@code +@lisp (setq message-prune-recipient-rules '(("^\\([^@]+\\)@\\(.*\\)" "\\1@.*[.]\\2"))) -@end code +@end lisp If, for instance, you want all wide replies that involve messages from -@samp{cvs@example.org} to go to that address, and nowhere else (i.e., -remove all other recipients if @samp{cvs@example.org} is in the +@samp{cvs@@example.org} to go to that address, and nowhere else (i.e., +remove all other recipients if @samp{cvs@@example.org} is in the recipient list: -@code +@lisp (setq message-prune-recipient-rules '(("cvs@example.org" "."))) -@end code +@end lisp @vindex message-wide-reply-confirm-recipients If @code{message-wide-reply-confirm-recipients} is non-@code{nil} you