changeset 58281:b6f9481dcccd

(Coding Conventions): Separate defvar and require methods to avoid warnings. Use require only when there are many functions and variables from that package.
author Richard M. Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
date Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:30:48 +0000
parents 08330213d737
children 7c3f5740a5cc
files lispref/tips.texi
diffstat 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) [+]
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/lispref/tips.texi	Tue Nov 16 17:27:48 2004 +0000
+++ b/lispref/tips.texi	Tue Nov 16 17:30:48 2004 +0000
@@ -370,25 +370,34 @@
 
 @item
 Try to avoid compiler warnings about undefined free variables, by adding
-@code{defvar} definitions for these variables.
+dummy @code{defvar} definitions for these variables, like this:
+
+@example
+(defvar foo)
+@end example
 
-Sometimes adding a @code{require} for another package is useful to avoid
-compilation warnings for variables and functions defined in that
-package.  If you do this, often it is better if the @code{require} acts
-only at compile time.  Here's how to do that:
+Such a definition has no effect except to tell the compiler
+not to warn about uses of the variable @code{foo} in this file.
+
+@item
+If you use many functions and variables from a certain file, you can
+add a @code{require} for that package to avoid compilation warnings
+for them.  It is better if the @code{require} acts only at compile
+time.  Here's how to do this:
 
 @example
 (eval-when-compile
-  (require 'foo)
-  (defvar bar-baz))
+  (require 'foo))
 @end example
 
-If you bind a variable in one function, and use it or set it in another
-function, the compiler warns about the latter function unless the
-variable has a definition.  But often these variables have short names,
-and it is not clean for Lisp packages to define such variable names.
-Therefore, you should rename the variable to start with the name prefix
-used for the other functions and variables in your package.
+@item
+If you bind a variable in one function, and use it or set it in
+another function, the compiler warns about the latter function unless
+the variable has a definition.  But adding a definition would be
+unclean if the variable has a short names, since Lisp packages should
+not define short variable names.  The right thing to do is to rename
+this variable to start with the name prefix used for the other
+functions and variables in your package.
 
 @item
 Indent each function with @kbd{C-M-q} (@code{indent-sexp}) using the