Mercurial > emacs
changeset 83984:e79e60978f9c
Move to ../doc/lispref
author | Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 06 Sep 2007 04:10:13 +0000 |
parents | dc29367c4597 |
children | 3899964ab551 |
files | lispref/control.texi |
diffstat | 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1291 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/lispref/control.texi Thu Sep 06 04:10:07 2007 +0000 +++ /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 @@ -1,1291 +0,0 @@ -@c -*-texinfo-*- -@c This is part of the GNU Emacs Lisp Reference Manual. -@c Copyright (C) 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1998, 1999, 2001, 2002, -@c 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. -@c See the file elisp.texi for copying conditions. -@setfilename ../info/control -@node Control Structures, Variables, Evaluation, Top -@chapter Control Structures -@cindex special forms for control structures -@cindex control structures - - A Lisp program consists of expressions or @dfn{forms} (@pxref{Forms}). -We control the order of execution of these forms by enclosing them in -@dfn{control structures}. Control structures are special forms which -control when, whether, or how many times to execute the forms they -contain. - - The simplest order of execution is sequential execution: first form -@var{a}, then form @var{b}, and so on. This is what happens when you -write several forms in succession in the body of a function, or at top -level in a file of Lisp code---the forms are executed in the order -written. We call this @dfn{textual order}. For example, if a function -body consists of two forms @var{a} and @var{b}, evaluation of the -function evaluates first @var{a} and then @var{b}. The result of -evaluating @var{b} becomes the value of the function. - - Explicit control structures make possible an order of execution other -than sequential. - - Emacs Lisp provides several kinds of control structure, including -other varieties of sequencing, conditionals, iteration, and (controlled) -jumps---all discussed below. The built-in control structures are -special forms since their subforms are not necessarily evaluated or not -evaluated sequentially. You can use macros to define your own control -structure constructs (@pxref{Macros}). - -@menu -* Sequencing:: Evaluation in textual order. -* Conditionals:: @code{if}, @code{cond}, @code{when}, @code{unless}. -* Combining Conditions:: @code{and}, @code{or}, @code{not}. -* Iteration:: @code{while} loops. -* Nonlocal Exits:: Jumping out of a sequence. -@end menu - -@node Sequencing -@section Sequencing - - Evaluating forms in the order they appear is the most common way -control passes from one form to another. In some contexts, such as in a -function body, this happens automatically. Elsewhere you must use a -control structure construct to do this: @code{progn}, the simplest -control construct of Lisp. - - A @code{progn} special form looks like this: - -@example -@group -(progn @var{a} @var{b} @var{c} @dots{}) -@end group -@end example - -@noindent -and it says to execute the forms @var{a}, @var{b}, @var{c}, and so on, in -that order. These forms are called the @dfn{body} of the @code{progn} form. -The value of the last form in the body becomes the value of the entire -@code{progn}. @code{(progn)} returns @code{nil}. - -@cindex implicit @code{progn} - In the early days of Lisp, @code{progn} was the only way to execute -two or more forms in succession and use the value of the last of them. -But programmers found they often needed to use a @code{progn} in the -body of a function, where (at that time) only one form was allowed. So -the body of a function was made into an ``implicit @code{progn}'': -several forms are allowed just as in the body of an actual @code{progn}. -Many other control structures likewise contain an implicit @code{progn}. -As a result, @code{progn} is not used as much as it was many years ago. -It is needed now most often inside an @code{unwind-protect}, @code{and}, -@code{or}, or in the @var{then}-part of an @code{if}. - -@defspec progn forms@dots{} -This special form evaluates all of the @var{forms}, in textual -order, returning the result of the final form. - -@example -@group -(progn (print "The first form") - (print "The second form") - (print "The third form")) - @print{} "The first form" - @print{} "The second form" - @print{} "The third form" -@result{} "The third form" -@end group -@end example -@end defspec - - Two other control constructs likewise evaluate a series of forms but return -a different value: - -@defspec prog1 form1 forms@dots{} -This special form evaluates @var{form1} and all of the @var{forms}, in -textual order, returning the result of @var{form1}. - -@example -@group -(prog1 (print "The first form") - (print "The second form") - (print "The third form")) - @print{} "The first form" - @print{} "The second form" - @print{} "The third form" -@result{} "The first form" -@end group -@end example - -Here is a way to remove the first element from a list in the variable -@code{x}, then return the value of that former element: - -@example -(prog1 (car x) (setq x (cdr x))) -@end example -@end defspec - -@defspec prog2 form1 form2 forms@dots{} -This special form evaluates @var{form1}, @var{form2}, and all of the -following @var{forms}, in textual order, returning the result of -@var{form2}. - -@example -@group -(prog2 (print "The first form") - (print "The second form") - (print "The third form")) - @print{} "The first form" - @print{} "The second form" - @print{} "The third form" -@result{} "The second form" -@end group -@end example -@end defspec - -@node Conditionals -@section Conditionals -@cindex conditional evaluation - - Conditional control structures choose among alternatives. Emacs Lisp -has four conditional forms: @code{if}, which is much the same as in -other languages; @code{when} and @code{unless}, which are variants of -@code{if}; and @code{cond}, which is a generalized case statement. - -@defspec if condition then-form else-forms@dots{} -@code{if} chooses between the @var{then-form} and the @var{else-forms} -based on the value of @var{condition}. If the evaluated @var{condition} is -non-@code{nil}, @var{then-form} is evaluated and the result returned. -Otherwise, the @var{else-forms} are evaluated in textual order, and the -value of the last one is returned. (The @var{else} part of @code{if} is -an example of an implicit @code{progn}. @xref{Sequencing}.) - -If @var{condition} has the value @code{nil}, and no @var{else-forms} are -given, @code{if} returns @code{nil}. - -@code{if} is a special form because the branch that is not selected is -never evaluated---it is ignored. Thus, in the example below, -@code{true} is not printed because @code{print} is never called. - -@example -@group -(if nil - (print 'true) - 'very-false) -@result{} very-false -@end group -@end example -@end defspec - -@defmac when condition then-forms@dots{} -This is a variant of @code{if} where there are no @var{else-forms}, -and possibly several @var{then-forms}. In particular, - -@example -(when @var{condition} @var{a} @var{b} @var{c}) -@end example - -@noindent -is entirely equivalent to - -@example -(if @var{condition} (progn @var{a} @var{b} @var{c}) nil) -@end example -@end defmac - -@defmac unless condition forms@dots{} -This is a variant of @code{if} where there is no @var{then-form}: - -@example -(unless @var{condition} @var{a} @var{b} @var{c}) -@end example - -@noindent -is entirely equivalent to - -@example -(if @var{condition} nil - @var{a} @var{b} @var{c}) -@end example -@end defmac - -@defspec cond clause@dots{} -@code{cond} chooses among an arbitrary number of alternatives. Each -@var{clause} in the @code{cond} must be a list. The @sc{car} of this -list is the @var{condition}; the remaining elements, if any, the -@var{body-forms}. Thus, a clause looks like this: - -@example -(@var{condition} @var{body-forms}@dots{}) -@end example - -@code{cond} tries the clauses in textual order, by evaluating the -@var{condition} of each clause. If the value of @var{condition} is -non-@code{nil}, the clause ``succeeds''; then @code{cond} evaluates its -@var{body-forms}, and the value of the last of @var{body-forms} becomes -the value of the @code{cond}. The remaining clauses are ignored. - -If the value of @var{condition} is @code{nil}, the clause ``fails,'' so -the @code{cond} moves on to the following clause, trying its -@var{condition}. - -If every @var{condition} evaluates to @code{nil}, so that every clause -fails, @code{cond} returns @code{nil}. - -A clause may also look like this: - -@example -(@var{condition}) -@end example - -@noindent -Then, if @var{condition} is non-@code{nil} when tested, the value of -@var{condition} becomes the value of the @code{cond} form. - -The following example has four clauses, which test for the cases where -the value of @code{x} is a number, string, buffer and symbol, -respectively: - -@example -@group -(cond ((numberp x) x) - ((stringp x) x) - ((bufferp x) - (setq temporary-hack x) ; @r{multiple body-forms} - (buffer-name x)) ; @r{in one clause} - ((symbolp x) (symbol-value x))) -@end group -@end example - -Often we want to execute the last clause whenever none of the previous -clauses was successful. To do this, we use @code{t} as the -@var{condition} of the last clause, like this: @code{(t -@var{body-forms})}. The form @code{t} evaluates to @code{t}, which is -never @code{nil}, so this clause never fails, provided the @code{cond} -gets to it at all. - -For example, - -@example -@group -(setq a 5) -(cond ((eq a 'hack) 'foo) - (t "default")) -@result{} "default" -@end group -@end example - -@noindent -This @code{cond} expression returns @code{foo} if the value of @code{a} -is @code{hack}, and returns the string @code{"default"} otherwise. -@end defspec - -Any conditional construct can be expressed with @code{cond} or with -@code{if}. Therefore, the choice between them is a matter of style. -For example: - -@example -@group -(if @var{a} @var{b} @var{c}) -@equiv{} -(cond (@var{a} @var{b}) (t @var{c})) -@end group -@end example - -@node Combining Conditions -@section Constructs for Combining Conditions - - This section describes three constructs that are often used together -with @code{if} and @code{cond} to express complicated conditions. The -constructs @code{and} and @code{or} can also be used individually as -kinds of multiple conditional constructs. - -@defun not condition -This function tests for the falsehood of @var{condition}. It returns -@code{t} if @var{condition} is @code{nil}, and @code{nil} otherwise. -The function @code{not} is identical to @code{null}, and we recommend -using the name @code{null} if you are testing for an empty list. -@end defun - -@defspec and conditions@dots{} -The @code{and} special form tests whether all the @var{conditions} are -true. It works by evaluating the @var{conditions} one by one in the -order written. - -If any of the @var{conditions} evaluates to @code{nil}, then the result -of the @code{and} must be @code{nil} regardless of the remaining -@var{conditions}; so @code{and} returns @code{nil} right away, ignoring -the remaining @var{conditions}. - -If all the @var{conditions} turn out non-@code{nil}, then the value of -the last of them becomes the value of the @code{and} form. Just -@code{(and)}, with no @var{conditions}, returns @code{t}, appropriate -because all the @var{conditions} turned out non-@code{nil}. (Think -about it; which one did not?) - -Here is an example. The first condition returns the integer 1, which is -not @code{nil}. Similarly, the second condition returns the integer 2, -which is not @code{nil}. The third condition is @code{nil}, so the -remaining condition is never evaluated. - -@example -@group -(and (print 1) (print 2) nil (print 3)) - @print{} 1 - @print{} 2 -@result{} nil -@end group -@end example - -Here is a more realistic example of using @code{and}: - -@example -@group -(if (and (consp foo) (eq (car foo) 'x)) - (message "foo is a list starting with x")) -@end group -@end example - -@noindent -Note that @code{(car foo)} is not executed if @code{(consp foo)} returns -@code{nil}, thus avoiding an error. - -@code{and} expressions can also be written using either @code{if} or -@code{cond}. Here's how: - -@example -@group -(and @var{arg1} @var{arg2} @var{arg3}) -@equiv{} -(if @var{arg1} (if @var{arg2} @var{arg3})) -@equiv{} -(cond (@var{arg1} (cond (@var{arg2} @var{arg3})))) -@end group -@end example -@end defspec - -@defspec or conditions@dots{} -The @code{or} special form tests whether at least one of the -@var{conditions} is true. It works by evaluating all the -@var{conditions} one by one in the order written. - -If any of the @var{conditions} evaluates to a non-@code{nil} value, then -the result of the @code{or} must be non-@code{nil}; so @code{or} returns -right away, ignoring the remaining @var{conditions}. The value it -returns is the non-@code{nil} value of the condition just evaluated. - -If all the @var{conditions} turn out @code{nil}, then the @code{or} -expression returns @code{nil}. Just @code{(or)}, with no -@var{conditions}, returns @code{nil}, appropriate because all the -@var{conditions} turned out @code{nil}. (Think about it; which one -did not?) - -For example, this expression tests whether @code{x} is either -@code{nil} or the integer zero: - -@example -(or (eq x nil) (eq x 0)) -@end example - -Like the @code{and} construct, @code{or} can be written in terms of -@code{cond}. For example: - -@example -@group -(or @var{arg1} @var{arg2} @var{arg3}) -@equiv{} -(cond (@var{arg1}) - (@var{arg2}) - (@var{arg3})) -@end group -@end example - -You could almost write @code{or} in terms of @code{if}, but not quite: - -@example -@group -(if @var{arg1} @var{arg1} - (if @var{arg2} @var{arg2} - @var{arg3})) -@end group -@end example - -@noindent -This is not completely equivalent because it can evaluate @var{arg1} or -@var{arg2} twice. By contrast, @code{(or @var{arg1} @var{arg2} -@var{arg3})} never evaluates any argument more than once. -@end defspec - -@node Iteration -@section Iteration -@cindex iteration -@cindex recursion - - Iteration means executing part of a program repetitively. For -example, you might want to repeat some computation once for each element -of a list, or once for each integer from 0 to @var{n}. You can do this -in Emacs Lisp with the special form @code{while}: - -@defspec while condition forms@dots{} -@code{while} first evaluates @var{condition}. If the result is -non-@code{nil}, it evaluates @var{forms} in textual order. Then it -reevaluates @var{condition}, and if the result is non-@code{nil}, it -evaluates @var{forms} again. This process repeats until @var{condition} -evaluates to @code{nil}. - -There is no limit on the number of iterations that may occur. The loop -will continue until either @var{condition} evaluates to @code{nil} or -until an error or @code{throw} jumps out of it (@pxref{Nonlocal Exits}). - -The value of a @code{while} form is always @code{nil}. - -@example -@group -(setq num 0) - @result{} 0 -@end group -@group -(while (< num 4) - (princ (format "Iteration %d." num)) - (setq num (1+ num))) - @print{} Iteration 0. - @print{} Iteration 1. - @print{} Iteration 2. - @print{} Iteration 3. - @result{} nil -@end group -@end example - -To write a ``repeat...until'' loop, which will execute something on each -iteration and then do the end-test, put the body followed by the -end-test in a @code{progn} as the first argument of @code{while}, as -shown here: - -@example -@group -(while (progn - (forward-line 1) - (not (looking-at "^$")))) -@end group -@end example - -@noindent -This moves forward one line and continues moving by lines until it -reaches an empty line. It is peculiar in that the @code{while} has no -body, just the end test (which also does the real work of moving point). -@end defspec - - The @code{dolist} and @code{dotimes} macros provide convenient ways to -write two common kinds of loops. - -@defmac dolist (var list [result]) body@dots{} -This construct executes @var{body} once for each element of -@var{list}, binding the variable @var{var} locally to hold the current -element. Then it returns the value of evaluating @var{result}, or -@code{nil} if @var{result} is omitted. For example, here is how you -could use @code{dolist} to define the @code{reverse} function: - -@example -(defun reverse (list) - (let (value) - (dolist (elt list value) - (setq value (cons elt value))))) -@end example -@end defmac - -@defmac dotimes (var count [result]) body@dots{} -This construct executes @var{body} once for each integer from 0 -(inclusive) to @var{count} (exclusive), binding the variable @var{var} -to the integer for the current iteration. Then it returns the value -of evaluating @var{result}, or @code{nil} if @var{result} is omitted. -Here is an example of using @code{dotimes} to do something 100 times: - -@example -(dotimes (i 100) - (insert "I will not obey absurd orders\n")) -@end example -@end defmac - -@node Nonlocal Exits -@section Nonlocal Exits -@cindex nonlocal exits - - A @dfn{nonlocal exit} is a transfer of control from one point in a -program to another remote point. Nonlocal exits can occur in Emacs Lisp -as a result of errors; you can also use them under explicit control. -Nonlocal exits unbind all variable bindings made by the constructs being -exited. - -@menu -* Catch and Throw:: Nonlocal exits for the program's own purposes. -* Examples of Catch:: Showing how such nonlocal exits can be written. -* Errors:: How errors are signaled and handled. -* Cleanups:: Arranging to run a cleanup form if an error happens. -@end menu - -@node Catch and Throw -@subsection Explicit Nonlocal Exits: @code{catch} and @code{throw} - - Most control constructs affect only the flow of control within the -construct itself. The function @code{throw} is the exception to this -rule of normal program execution: it performs a nonlocal exit on -request. (There are other exceptions, but they are for error handling -only.) @code{throw} is used inside a @code{catch}, and jumps back to -that @code{catch}. For example: - -@example -@group -(defun foo-outer () - (catch 'foo - (foo-inner))) - -(defun foo-inner () - @dots{} - (if x - (throw 'foo t)) - @dots{}) -@end group -@end example - -@noindent -The @code{throw} form, if executed, transfers control straight back to -the corresponding @code{catch}, which returns immediately. The code -following the @code{throw} is not executed. The second argument of -@code{throw} is used as the return value of the @code{catch}. - - The function @code{throw} finds the matching @code{catch} based on the -first argument: it searches for a @code{catch} whose first argument is -@code{eq} to the one specified in the @code{throw}. If there is more -than one applicable @code{catch}, the innermost one takes precedence. -Thus, in the above example, the @code{throw} specifies @code{foo}, and -the @code{catch} in @code{foo-outer} specifies the same symbol, so that -@code{catch} is the applicable one (assuming there is no other matching -@code{catch} in between). - - Executing @code{throw} exits all Lisp constructs up to the matching -@code{catch}, including function calls. When binding constructs such as -@code{let} or function calls are exited in this way, the bindings are -unbound, just as they are when these constructs exit normally -(@pxref{Local Variables}). Likewise, @code{throw} restores the buffer -and position saved by @code{save-excursion} (@pxref{Excursions}), and -the narrowing status saved by @code{save-restriction} and the window -selection saved by @code{save-window-excursion} (@pxref{Window -Configurations}). It also runs any cleanups established with the -@code{unwind-protect} special form when it exits that form -(@pxref{Cleanups}). - - The @code{throw} need not appear lexically within the @code{catch} -that it jumps to. It can equally well be called from another function -called within the @code{catch}. As long as the @code{throw} takes place -chronologically after entry to the @code{catch}, and chronologically -before exit from it, it has access to that @code{catch}. This is why -@code{throw} can be used in commands such as @code{exit-recursive-edit} -that throw back to the editor command loop (@pxref{Recursive Editing}). - -@cindex CL note---only @code{throw} in Emacs -@quotation -@b{Common Lisp note:} Most other versions of Lisp, including Common Lisp, -have several ways of transferring control nonsequentially: @code{return}, -@code{return-from}, and @code{go}, for example. Emacs Lisp has only -@code{throw}. -@end quotation - -@defspec catch tag body@dots{} -@cindex tag on run time stack -@code{catch} establishes a return point for the @code{throw} function. -The return point is distinguished from other such return points by -@var{tag}, which may be any Lisp object except @code{nil}. The argument -@var{tag} is evaluated normally before the return point is established. - -With the return point in effect, @code{catch} evaluates the forms of the -@var{body} in textual order. If the forms execute normally (without -error or nonlocal exit) the value of the last body form is returned from -the @code{catch}. - -If a @code{throw} is executed during the execution of @var{body}, -specifying the same value @var{tag}, the @code{catch} form exits -immediately; the value it returns is whatever was specified as the -second argument of @code{throw}. -@end defspec - -@defun throw tag value -The purpose of @code{throw} is to return from a return point previously -established with @code{catch}. The argument @var{tag} is used to choose -among the various existing return points; it must be @code{eq} to the value -specified in the @code{catch}. If multiple return points match @var{tag}, -the innermost one is used. - -The argument @var{value} is used as the value to return from that -@code{catch}. - -@kindex no-catch -If no return point is in effect with tag @var{tag}, then a @code{no-catch} -error is signaled with data @code{(@var{tag} @var{value})}. -@end defun - -@node Examples of Catch -@subsection Examples of @code{catch} and @code{throw} - - One way to use @code{catch} and @code{throw} is to exit from a doubly -nested loop. (In most languages, this would be done with a ``go to.'') -Here we compute @code{(foo @var{i} @var{j})} for @var{i} and @var{j} -varying from 0 to 9: - -@example -@group -(defun search-foo () - (catch 'loop - (let ((i 0)) - (while (< i 10) - (let ((j 0)) - (while (< j 10) - (if (foo i j) - (throw 'loop (list i j))) - (setq j (1+ j)))) - (setq i (1+ i)))))) -@end group -@end example - -@noindent -If @code{foo} ever returns non-@code{nil}, we stop immediately and return a -list of @var{i} and @var{j}. If @code{foo} always returns @code{nil}, the -@code{catch} returns normally, and the value is @code{nil}, since that -is the result of the @code{while}. - - Here are two tricky examples, slightly different, showing two -return points at once. First, two return points with the same tag, -@code{hack}: - -@example -@group -(defun catch2 (tag) - (catch tag - (throw 'hack 'yes))) -@result{} catch2 -@end group - -@group -(catch 'hack - (print (catch2 'hack)) - 'no) -@print{} yes -@result{} no -@end group -@end example - -@noindent -Since both return points have tags that match the @code{throw}, it goes to -the inner one, the one established in @code{catch2}. Therefore, -@code{catch2} returns normally with value @code{yes}, and this value is -printed. Finally the second body form in the outer @code{catch}, which is -@code{'no}, is evaluated and returned from the outer @code{catch}. - - Now let's change the argument given to @code{catch2}: - -@example -@group -(catch 'hack - (print (catch2 'quux)) - 'no) -@result{} yes -@end group -@end example - -@noindent -We still have two return points, but this time only the outer one has -the tag @code{hack}; the inner one has the tag @code{quux} instead. -Therefore, @code{throw} makes the outer @code{catch} return the value -@code{yes}. The function @code{print} is never called, and the -body-form @code{'no} is never evaluated. - -@node Errors -@subsection Errors -@cindex errors - - When Emacs Lisp attempts to evaluate a form that, for some reason, -cannot be evaluated, it @dfn{signals} an @dfn{error}. - - When an error is signaled, Emacs's default reaction is to print an -error message and terminate execution of the current command. This is -the right thing to do in most cases, such as if you type @kbd{C-f} at -the end of the buffer. - - In complicated programs, simple termination may not be what you want. -For example, the program may have made temporary changes in data -structures, or created temporary buffers that should be deleted before -the program is finished. In such cases, you would use -@code{unwind-protect} to establish @dfn{cleanup expressions} to be -evaluated in case of error. (@xref{Cleanups}.) Occasionally, you may -wish the program to continue execution despite an error in a subroutine. -In these cases, you would use @code{condition-case} to establish -@dfn{error handlers} to recover control in case of error. - - Resist the temptation to use error handling to transfer control from -one part of the program to another; use @code{catch} and @code{throw} -instead. @xref{Catch and Throw}. - -@menu -* Signaling Errors:: How to report an error. -* Processing of Errors:: What Emacs does when you report an error. -* Handling Errors:: How you can trap errors and continue execution. -* Error Symbols:: How errors are classified for trapping them. -@end menu - -@node Signaling Errors -@subsubsection How to Signal an Error -@cindex signaling errors - - @dfn{Signaling} an error means beginning error processing. Error -processing normally aborts all or part of the running program and -returns to a point that is set up to handle the error -(@pxref{Processing of Errors}). Here we describe how to signal an -error. - - Most errors are signaled ``automatically'' within Lisp primitives -which you call for other purposes, such as if you try to take the -@sc{car} of an integer or move forward a character at the end of the -buffer. You can also signal errors explicitly with the functions -@code{error} and @code{signal}. - - Quitting, which happens when the user types @kbd{C-g}, is not -considered an error, but it is handled almost like an error. -@xref{Quitting}. - - Every error specifies an error message, one way or another. The -message should state what is wrong (``File does not exist''), not how -things ought to be (``File must exist''). The convention in Emacs -Lisp is that error messages should start with a capital letter, but -should not end with any sort of punctuation. - -@defun error format-string &rest args -This function signals an error with an error message constructed by -applying @code{format} (@pxref{Formatting Strings}) to -@var{format-string} and @var{args}. - -These examples show typical uses of @code{error}: - -@example -@group -(error "That is an error -- try something else") - @error{} That is an error -- try something else -@end group - -@group -(error "You have committed %d errors" 10) - @error{} You have committed 10 errors -@end group -@end example - -@code{error} works by calling @code{signal} with two arguments: the -error symbol @code{error}, and a list containing the string returned by -@code{format}. - -@strong{Warning:} If you want to use your own string as an error message -verbatim, don't just write @code{(error @var{string})}. If @var{string} -contains @samp{%}, it will be interpreted as a format specifier, with -undesirable results. Instead, use @code{(error "%s" @var{string})}. -@end defun - -@defun signal error-symbol data -@anchor{Definition of signal} -This function signals an error named by @var{error-symbol}. The -argument @var{data} is a list of additional Lisp objects relevant to -the circumstances of the error. - -The argument @var{error-symbol} must be an @dfn{error symbol}---a symbol -bearing a property @code{error-conditions} whose value is a list of -condition names. This is how Emacs Lisp classifies different sorts of -errors. @xref{Error Symbols}, for a description of error symbols, -error conditions and condition names. - -If the error is not handled, the two arguments are used in printing -the error message. Normally, this error message is provided by the -@code{error-message} property of @var{error-symbol}. If @var{data} is -non-@code{nil}, this is followed by a colon and a comma separated list -of the unevaluated elements of @var{data}. For @code{error}, the -error message is the @sc{car} of @var{data} (that must be a string). -Subcategories of @code{file-error} are handled specially. - -The number and significance of the objects in @var{data} depends on -@var{error-symbol}. For example, with a @code{wrong-type-arg} error, -there should be two objects in the list: a predicate that describes the type -that was expected, and the object that failed to fit that type. - -Both @var{error-symbol} and @var{data} are available to any error -handlers that handle the error: @code{condition-case} binds a local -variable to a list of the form @code{(@var{error-symbol} .@: -@var{data})} (@pxref{Handling Errors}). - -The function @code{signal} never returns (though in older Emacs versions -it could sometimes return). - -@smallexample -@group -(signal 'wrong-number-of-arguments '(x y)) - @error{} Wrong number of arguments: x, y -@end group - -@group -(signal 'no-such-error '("My unknown error condition")) - @error{} peculiar error: "My unknown error condition" -@end group -@end smallexample -@end defun - -@cindex CL note---no continuable errors -@quotation -@b{Common Lisp note:} Emacs Lisp has nothing like the Common Lisp -concept of continuable errors. -@end quotation - -@node Processing of Errors -@subsubsection How Emacs Processes Errors - -When an error is signaled, @code{signal} searches for an active -@dfn{handler} for the error. A handler is a sequence of Lisp -expressions designated to be executed if an error happens in part of the -Lisp program. If the error has an applicable handler, the handler is -executed, and control resumes following the handler. The handler -executes in the environment of the @code{condition-case} that -established it; all functions called within that @code{condition-case} -have already been exited, and the handler cannot return to them. - -If there is no applicable handler for the error, it terminates the -current command and returns control to the editor command loop. (The -command loop has an implicit handler for all kinds of errors.) The -command loop's handler uses the error symbol and associated data to -print an error message. You can use the variable -@code{command-error-function} to control how this is done: - -@defvar command-error-function -This variable, if non-@code{nil}, specifies a function to use to -handle errors that return control to the Emacs command loop. The -function should take three arguments: @var{data}, a list of the same -form that @code{condition-case} would bind to its variable; -@var{context}, a string describing the situation in which the error -occurred, or (more often) @code{nil}; and @var{caller}, the Lisp -function which called the primitive that signaled the error. -@end defvar - -@cindex @code{debug-on-error} use -An error that has no explicit handler may call the Lisp debugger. The -debugger is enabled if the variable @code{debug-on-error} (@pxref{Error -Debugging}) is non-@code{nil}. Unlike error handlers, the debugger runs -in the environment of the error, so that you can examine values of -variables precisely as they were at the time of the error. - -@node Handling Errors -@subsubsection Writing Code to Handle Errors -@cindex error handler -@cindex handling errors - - The usual effect of signaling an error is to terminate the command -that is running and return immediately to the Emacs editor command loop. -You can arrange to trap errors occurring in a part of your program by -establishing an error handler, with the special form -@code{condition-case}. A simple example looks like this: - -@example -@group -(condition-case nil - (delete-file filename) - (error nil)) -@end group -@end example - -@noindent -This deletes the file named @var{filename}, catching any error and -returning @code{nil} if an error occurs. - - The @code{condition-case} construct is often used to trap errors that -are predictable, such as failure to open a file in a call to -@code{insert-file-contents}. It is also used to trap errors that are -totally unpredictable, such as when the program evaluates an expression -read from the user. - - The second argument of @code{condition-case} is called the -@dfn{protected form}. (In the example above, the protected form is a -call to @code{delete-file}.) The error handlers go into effect when -this form begins execution and are deactivated when this form returns. -They remain in effect for all the intervening time. In particular, they -are in effect during the execution of functions called by this form, in -their subroutines, and so on. This is a good thing, since, strictly -speaking, errors can be signaled only by Lisp primitives (including -@code{signal} and @code{error}) called by the protected form, not by the -protected form itself. - - The arguments after the protected form are handlers. Each handler -lists one or more @dfn{condition names} (which are symbols) to specify -which errors it will handle. The error symbol specified when an error -is signaled also defines a list of condition names. A handler applies -to an error if they have any condition names in common. In the example -above, there is one handler, and it specifies one condition name, -@code{error}, which covers all errors. - - The search for an applicable handler checks all the established handlers -starting with the most recently established one. Thus, if two nested -@code{condition-case} forms offer to handle the same error, the inner of -the two gets to handle it. - - If an error is handled by some @code{condition-case} form, this -ordinarily prevents the debugger from being run, even if -@code{debug-on-error} says this error should invoke the debugger. - - If you want to be able to debug errors that are caught by a -@code{condition-case}, set the variable @code{debug-on-signal} to a -non-@code{nil} value. You can also specify that a particular handler -should let the debugger run first, by writing @code{debug} among the -conditions, like this: - -@example -@group -(condition-case nil - (delete-file filename) - ((debug error) nil)) -@end group -@end example - -@noindent -The effect of @code{debug} here is only to prevent -@code{condition-case} from suppressing the call to the debugger. Any -given error will invoke the debugger only if @code{debug-on-error} and -the other usual filtering mechanisms say it should. @xref{Error Debugging}. - - Once Emacs decides that a certain handler handles the error, it -returns control to that handler. To do so, Emacs unbinds all variable -bindings made by binding constructs that are being exited, and -executes the cleanups of all @code{unwind-protect} forms that are -being exited. Once control arrives at the handler, the body of the -handler executes normally. - - After execution of the handler body, execution returns from the -@code{condition-case} form. Because the protected form is exited -completely before execution of the handler, the handler cannot resume -execution at the point of the error, nor can it examine variable -bindings that were made within the protected form. All it can do is -clean up and proceed. - - Error signaling and handling have some resemblance to @code{throw} and -@code{catch} (@pxref{Catch and Throw}), but they are entirely separate -facilities. An error cannot be caught by a @code{catch}, and a -@code{throw} cannot be handled by an error handler (though using -@code{throw} when there is no suitable @code{catch} signals an error -that can be handled). - -@defspec condition-case var protected-form handlers@dots{} -This special form establishes the error handlers @var{handlers} around -the execution of @var{protected-form}. If @var{protected-form} executes -without error, the value it returns becomes the value of the -@code{condition-case} form; in this case, the @code{condition-case} has -no effect. The @code{condition-case} form makes a difference when an -error occurs during @var{protected-form}. - -Each of the @var{handlers} is a list of the form @code{(@var{conditions} -@var{body}@dots{})}. Here @var{conditions} is an error condition name -to be handled, or a list of condition names (which can include @code{debug} -to allow the debugger to run before the handler); @var{body} is one or more -Lisp expressions to be executed when this handler handles an error. -Here are examples of handlers: - -@smallexample -@group -(error nil) - -(arith-error (message "Division by zero")) - -((arith-error file-error) - (message - "Either division by zero or failure to open a file")) -@end group -@end smallexample - -Each error that occurs has an @dfn{error symbol} that describes what -kind of error it is. The @code{error-conditions} property of this -symbol is a list of condition names (@pxref{Error Symbols}). Emacs -searches all the active @code{condition-case} forms for a handler that -specifies one or more of these condition names; the innermost matching -@code{condition-case} handles the error. Within this -@code{condition-case}, the first applicable handler handles the error. - -After executing the body of the handler, the @code{condition-case} -returns normally, using the value of the last form in the handler body -as the overall value. - -@cindex error description -The argument @var{var} is a variable. @code{condition-case} does not -bind this variable when executing the @var{protected-form}, only when it -handles an error. At that time, it binds @var{var} locally to an -@dfn{error description}, which is a list giving the particulars of the -error. The error description has the form @code{(@var{error-symbol} -. @var{data})}. The handler can refer to this list to decide what to -do. For example, if the error is for failure opening a file, the file -name is the second element of @var{data}---the third element of the -error description. - -If @var{var} is @code{nil}, that means no variable is bound. Then the -error symbol and associated data are not available to the handler. -@end defspec - -@defun error-message-string error-description -This function returns the error message string for a given error -descriptor. It is useful if you want to handle an error by printing the -usual error message for that error. @xref{Definition of signal}. -@end defun - -@cindex @code{arith-error} example -Here is an example of using @code{condition-case} to handle the error -that results from dividing by zero. The handler displays the error -message (but without a beep), then returns a very large number. - -@smallexample -@group -(defun safe-divide (dividend divisor) - (condition-case err - ;; @r{Protected form.} - (/ dividend divisor) -@end group -@group - ;; @r{The handler.} - (arith-error ; @r{Condition.} - ;; @r{Display the usual message for this error.} - (message "%s" (error-message-string err)) - 1000000))) -@result{} safe-divide -@end group - -@group -(safe-divide 5 0) - @print{} Arithmetic error: (arith-error) -@result{} 1000000 -@end group -@end smallexample - -@noindent -The handler specifies condition name @code{arith-error} so that it will handle only division-by-zero errors. Other kinds of errors will not be handled, at least not by this @code{condition-case}. Thus, - -@smallexample -@group -(safe-divide nil 3) - @error{} Wrong type argument: number-or-marker-p, nil -@end group -@end smallexample - - Here is a @code{condition-case} that catches all kinds of errors, -including those signaled with @code{error}: - -@smallexample -@group -(setq baz 34) - @result{} 34 -@end group - -@group -(condition-case err - (if (eq baz 35) - t - ;; @r{This is a call to the function @code{error}.} - (error "Rats! The variable %s was %s, not 35" 'baz baz)) - ;; @r{This is the handler; it is not a form.} - (error (princ (format "The error was: %s" err)) - 2)) -@print{} The error was: (error "Rats! The variable baz was 34, not 35") -@result{} 2 -@end group -@end smallexample - -@node Error Symbols -@subsubsection Error Symbols and Condition Names -@cindex error symbol -@cindex error name -@cindex condition name -@cindex user-defined error -@kindex error-conditions - - When you signal an error, you specify an @dfn{error symbol} to specify -the kind of error you have in mind. Each error has one and only one -error symbol to categorize it. This is the finest classification of -errors defined by the Emacs Lisp language. - - These narrow classifications are grouped into a hierarchy of wider -classes called @dfn{error conditions}, identified by @dfn{condition -names}. The narrowest such classes belong to the error symbols -themselves: each error symbol is also a condition name. There are also -condition names for more extensive classes, up to the condition name -@code{error} which takes in all kinds of errors (but not @code{quit}). -Thus, each error has one or more condition names: @code{error}, the -error symbol if that is distinct from @code{error}, and perhaps some -intermediate classifications. - - In order for a symbol to be an error symbol, it must have an -@code{error-conditions} property which gives a list of condition names. -This list defines the conditions that this kind of error belongs to. -(The error symbol itself, and the symbol @code{error}, should always be -members of this list.) Thus, the hierarchy of condition names is -defined by the @code{error-conditions} properties of the error symbols. -Because quitting is not considered an error, the value of the -@code{error-conditions} property of @code{quit} is just @code{(quit)}. - -@cindex peculiar error - In addition to the @code{error-conditions} list, the error symbol -should have an @code{error-message} property whose value is a string to -be printed when that error is signaled but not handled. If the -error symbol has no @code{error-message} property or if the -@code{error-message} property exists, but is not a string, the error -message @samp{peculiar error} is used. @xref{Definition of signal}. - - Here is how we define a new error symbol, @code{new-error}: - -@example -@group -(put 'new-error - 'error-conditions - '(error my-own-errors new-error)) -@result{} (error my-own-errors new-error) -@end group -@group -(put 'new-error 'error-message "A new error") -@result{} "A new error" -@end group -@end example - -@noindent -This error has three condition names: @code{new-error}, the narrowest -classification; @code{my-own-errors}, which we imagine is a wider -classification; and @code{error}, which is the widest of all. - - The error string should start with a capital letter but it should -not end with a period. This is for consistency with the rest of Emacs. - - Naturally, Emacs will never signal @code{new-error} on its own; only -an explicit call to @code{signal} (@pxref{Definition of signal}) in -your code can do this: - -@example -@group -(signal 'new-error '(x y)) - @error{} A new error: x, y -@end group -@end example - - This error can be handled through any of the three condition names. -This example handles @code{new-error} and any other errors in the class -@code{my-own-errors}: - -@example -@group -(condition-case foo - (bar nil t) - (my-own-errors nil)) -@end group -@end example - - The significant way that errors are classified is by their condition -names---the names used to match errors with handlers. An error symbol -serves only as a convenient way to specify the intended error message -and list of condition names. It would be cumbersome to give -@code{signal} a list of condition names rather than one error symbol. - - By contrast, using only error symbols without condition names would -seriously decrease the power of @code{condition-case}. Condition names -make it possible to categorize errors at various levels of generality -when you write an error handler. Using error symbols alone would -eliminate all but the narrowest level of classification. - - @xref{Standard Errors}, for a list of all the standard error symbols -and their conditions. - -@node Cleanups -@subsection Cleaning Up from Nonlocal Exits - - The @code{unwind-protect} construct is essential whenever you -temporarily put a data structure in an inconsistent state; it permits -you to make the data consistent again in the event of an error or -throw. (Another more specific cleanup construct that is used only for -changes in buffer contents is the atomic change group; @ref{Atomic -Changes}.) - -@defspec unwind-protect body-form cleanup-forms@dots{} -@cindex cleanup forms -@cindex protected forms -@cindex error cleanup -@cindex unwinding -@code{unwind-protect} executes @var{body-form} with a guarantee that -the @var{cleanup-forms} will be evaluated if control leaves -@var{body-form}, no matter how that happens. @var{body-form} may -complete normally, or execute a @code{throw} out of the -@code{unwind-protect}, or cause an error; in all cases, the -@var{cleanup-forms} will be evaluated. - -If @var{body-form} finishes normally, @code{unwind-protect} returns the -value of @var{body-form}, after it evaluates the @var{cleanup-forms}. -If @var{body-form} does not finish, @code{unwind-protect} does not -return any value in the normal sense. - -Only @var{body-form} is protected by the @code{unwind-protect}. If any -of the @var{cleanup-forms} themselves exits nonlocally (via a -@code{throw} or an error), @code{unwind-protect} is @emph{not} -guaranteed to evaluate the rest of them. If the failure of one of the -@var{cleanup-forms} has the potential to cause trouble, then protect -it with another @code{unwind-protect} around that form. - -The number of currently active @code{unwind-protect} forms counts, -together with the number of local variable bindings, against the limit -@code{max-specpdl-size} (@pxref{Definition of max-specpdl-size,, Local -Variables}). -@end defspec - - For example, here we make an invisible buffer for temporary use, and -make sure to kill it before finishing: - -@smallexample -@group -(save-excursion - (let ((buffer (get-buffer-create " *temp*"))) - (set-buffer buffer) - (unwind-protect - @var{body-form} - (kill-buffer buffer)))) -@end group -@end smallexample - -@noindent -You might think that we could just as well write @code{(kill-buffer -(current-buffer))} and dispense with the variable @code{buffer}. -However, the way shown above is safer, if @var{body-form} happens to -get an error after switching to a different buffer! (Alternatively, -you could write another @code{save-excursion} around @var{body-form}, -to ensure that the temporary buffer becomes current again in time to -kill it.) - - Emacs includes a standard macro called @code{with-temp-buffer} which -expands into more or less the code shown above (@pxref{Definition of -with-temp-buffer,, Current Buffer}). Several of the macros defined in -this manual use @code{unwind-protect} in this way. - -@findex ftp-login - Here is an actual example derived from an FTP package. It creates a -process (@pxref{Processes}) to try to establish a connection to a remote -machine. As the function @code{ftp-login} is highly susceptible to -numerous problems that the writer of the function cannot anticipate, it -is protected with a form that guarantees deletion of the process in the -event of failure. Otherwise, Emacs might fill up with useless -subprocesses. - -@smallexample -@group -(let ((win nil)) - (unwind-protect - (progn - (setq process (ftp-setup-buffer host file)) - (if (setq win (ftp-login process host user password)) - (message "Logged in") - (error "Ftp login failed"))) - (or win (and process (delete-process process))))) -@end group -@end smallexample - - This example has a small bug: if the user types @kbd{C-g} to -quit, and the quit happens immediately after the function -@code{ftp-setup-buffer} returns but before the variable @code{process} is -set, the process will not be killed. There is no easy way to fix this bug, -but at least it is very unlikely. - -@ignore - arch-tag: 8abc30d4-4d3a-47f9-b908-e9e971c18c6d -@end ignore