Mercurial > emacs
changeset 63542:e8205c5fb59b
(Byte Packing): New node.
(Processes): Add it to menu.
author | Richard M. Stallman <rms@gnu.org> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 17 Jun 2005 13:51:19 +0000 |
parents | ddec16fed4a2 |
children | 7bc82f443768 |
files | lispref/processes.texi |
diffstat | 1 files changed, 402 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/lispref/processes.texi Fri Jun 17 13:47:44 2005 +0000 +++ b/lispref/processes.texi Fri Jun 17 13:51:19 2005 +0000 @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ * Datagrams:: UDP network connections. * Low-Level Network:: Lower-level but more general function to create connections and servers. +* Byte Packing:: Using bindat to pack and unpack binary data. @end menu @node Subprocess Creation @@ -2015,6 +2016,407 @@ @code{make-network-process} and @code{set-network-process-option}. @end table +@node Byte Packing +@section Packing and Unpacking Byte Arrays + + This section describes how to pack and unpack arrays of bytes, +usually for binary network protocols. These functoins byte arrays to +alists, and vice versa. The byte array can be represented as a +unibyte string or as a vector of integers, while the alist associates +symbols either with fixed-size objects or with recursive sub-alists. + +@cindex serializing +@cindex deserializing +@cindex packing +@cindex unpacking + Conversion from byte arrays to nested alists is also known as +@dfn{deserializing} or @dfn{unpacking}, while going in the opposite +direction is also known as @dfn{serializing} or @dfn{packing}. + +@menu +* Bindat Spec:: Describing data layout. +* Bindat Functions:: Doing the unpacking and packing. +* Bindat Examples:: Samples of what bindat.el can do for you! +@end menu + +@node Bindat Spec +@subsection Describing Data Layout + + To control unpacking and packing, you write a @dfn{data layout +specification}, a special nested list describing named and typed +@dfn{fields}. This specification conrtols length of each field to be +processed, and how to pack or unpack it. + +@cindex endianness +@cindex big endian +@cindex little endian +@cindex network byte ordering + A field's @dfn{type} describes the size (in bytes) of the object +that the field represents and, in the case of multibyte fields, how +the bytes are ordered within the firld. The two possible orderings +are ``big endian'' (also known as ``network byte ordering'') and +``little endian''. For instance, the number @code{#x23cd} (decimal +9165) in big endian would be the two bytes @code{#x23} @code{#xcd}; +and in little endian, @code{#xcd} @code{#x23}. Here are the possible +type values: + +@table @code +@item u8 +@itemx byte +Unsigned byte, with length 1. + +@item u16 +@itemx word +@itemx short +Unsigned integer in network byte order, with length 2. + +@item u24 +Unsigned integer in network byte order, with length 3. + +@item u32 +@itemx dword +@itemx long +Unsigned integer in network byte order, with length 4. +Note: These values may be limited by Emacs' integer implementation limits. + +@item u16r +@itemx u24r +@itemx u32r +Unsigned integer in little endian order, with length 2, 3 and 4, respectively. + +@item str @var{len} +String of length @var{len}. + +@item strz @var{len} +Zero-terminated string of length @var{len}. + +@item vec @var{len} +Vector of @var{len} bytes. + +@item ip +Four-byte vector representing an Internet address. For example: +@code{[127 0 0 1]} for localhost. + +@item bits @var{len} +List of set bits in @var{len} bytes. The bytes are taken in big +endian order and the bits are numbered starting with @code{8 * +@var{len} @minus{} 1}} and ending with zero. For example: @code{bits +2} unpacks @code{#x28} @code{#x1c} to @code{(2 3 4 11 13)} and +@code{#x1c} @code{#x28} to @code{(3 5 10 11 12)}. + +@item (eval @var{form}) +@var{form} is a Lisp expression evaluated at the moment the field is +unpacked or packed. The result of the evaluation should be one of the +above-listed type specifications. +@end table + +A field specification generally has the form @code{([@var{name}] +@var{handler})}. The square braces indicate that @var{name} is +optional. (Don't use names that are symbols meaningful as type +specifications (above) or handler specifications (below), since that +would be ambiguous.) @var{name} can be a symbol or the expression +@code{(eval @var{form})}, in which case @var{form} should evaluate to +a symbol. + +@var{handler} describes how to unpack or pack the field and can be one +of the following: + +@table @code +@item @var{type} +Unpack/pack this field according to the type specification @var{type}. + +@item eval @var{form} +Evaluate @var{form}, a Lisp expression, for side-effect only. If the +field name is specified, the value is bound to that field name. +@var{form} can access and update these dynamically bound variables: + +@table @code +@item raw-data +The data as a byte array. + +@item pos +Current position of the unpacking or packing operation. + +@item struct +Alist. + +@item last +Value of the last field processed. +@end table + +@item fill @var{len} +Skip @var{len} bytes. In packing, this leaves them unchanged, +which normally means they remain zero. In unpacking, this means +they are ignored. + +@item align @var{len} +Skip to the next multiple of @var{len} bytes. + +@item struct @var{spec-name} +Process @var{spec-name} as a sub-specification. This descrobes a +structure nested within another structure. + +@item union @var{form} (@var{tag} @var{spec})@dots{} +@c ??? I don't see how one would actually use this. +@c ??? what kind of expression would be useful for @var{form}? +Evaluate @var{form}, a Lisp expression, find the first @var{tag} +that matches it, and process its associated data layout specification +@var{spec}. Matching can occur in one of three ways: + +@itemize +@item +If a @var{tag} has the form @code{(eval @var{expr})}, evaluate +@var{expr} with the variable @code{tag} dynamically bound to the value +of @var{form}. A non-@code{nil} result indicates a match. + +@item +@var{tag} matches if it is @code{equal} to the value of @var{form}. + +@item +@var{tag} matches unconditionally if it is @code{t}. +@end itemize + +@item repeat @var{count} @var{field-spec}@dots{} +@var{count} may be an integer, or a list of one element naming a +previous field. For correct operation, each @var{field-spec} must +include a name. +@c ??? What does it MEAN? +@end table + +@node Bindat Functions +@subsection Functions to Unpack and Pack Bytes + + In the following documentation, @var{spec} refers to a data layout +specification, @code{raw-data} to a byte array, and @var{struct} to an +alist representing unpacked field data. + +@defun bindat-unpack spec raw-data &optional pos +This function unpacks data from the byte array @code{raw-data} +according to @var{spec}. Normally this starts unpacking at the +beginning of the byte array, but if @var{pos} is non-@code{nil}, it +specifies a zero-based starting position to use instead. + +The value is an alist or nested alist in which each element describes +one unpacked field. +@end defun + +@defun bindat-get-field struct &rest name +This function selects a field's data from the nested alist +@var{struct}. Usually @var{struct} was returned by +@code{bindat-unpack}. If @var{name} corresponds to just one argument, +that means to extract a top-level field value. Multiple @var{name} +arguments specify repeated lookup of sub-structures. An integer name +acts as an array index. + +For example, if @var{name} is @code{(a b 2 c)}, that means to find +field @code{c} in the second element of subfield @code{b} of field +@code{a}. (This corresponds to @code{struct.a.b[2].c} in C.) +@end defun + +@defun bindat-length spec struct +@c ??? I don't understand this at all -- rms +This function returns the length in bytes of @var{struct}, according +to @var{spec}. +@end defun + +@defun bindat-pack spec struct &optional raw-data pos +This function returns a byte array packed according to @var{spec} from +the data in the alist @var{struct}. Normally it creates and fills a +new byte array starting at the beginning. However, if @var{raw-data} +is non-@code{nil}, it speciries a pre-allocated string or vector to +pack into. If @var{pos} is non-@code{nil}, it specifies the starting +offset for packing into @code{raw-data}. + +@c ??? Isn't this a bug? Shoudn't it always be unibyte? +Note: The result is a multibyte string; use @code{string-make-unibyte} +on it to make it unibyte if necessary. +@end defun + +@defun bindat-ip-to-string ip +Convert the Internet address vector @var{ip} to a string in the usual +dotted notation. + +@example +(bindat-ip-to-string [127 0 0 1]) + @result{} "127.0.0.1" +@end example +@end defun + +@node Bindat Examples +@subsection Examples of Byte Unpacking and Packing + + Here is a complete example of byte unpacking and packing: + + @lisp +(defvar fcookie-index-spec + '((:version u32) + (:count u32) + (:longest u32) + (:shortest u32) + (:flags u32) + (:delim u8) + (:ignored fill 3) + (:offset repeat (:count) + (:foo u32))) + "Description of a fortune cookie index file's contents.") + +(defun fcookie (cookies &optional index) + "Display a random fortune cookie from file COOKIES. +Optional second arg INDEX specifies the associated index +filename, which is by default constructed by appending +\".dat\" to COOKIES. Display cookie text in possibly +new buffer \"*Fortune Cookie: BASENAME*\" where BASENAME +is COOKIES without the directory part." + (interactive "fCookies file: ") + (let* ((info (with-temp-buffer + (insert-file-contents-literally + (or index (concat cookies ".dat"))) + (bindat-unpack fcookie-index-spec + (buffer-string)))) + (sel (random (bindat-get-field info :count))) + (beg (cdar (bindat-get-field info :offset sel))) + (end (or (cdar (bindat-get-field info :offset (1+ sel))) + (nth 7 (file-attributes cookies))))) + (switch-to-buffer (get-buffer-create + (format "*Fortune Cookie: %s*" + (file-name-nondirectory cookies)))) + (erase-buffer) + (insert-file-contents-literally cookies nil beg (- end 3)))) + +(defun fcookie-create-index (cookies &optional index delim) + "Scan file COOKIES, and write out its index file. +Optional second arg INDEX specifies the index filename, +which is by default constructed by appending \".dat\" to +COOKIES. Optional third arg DELIM specifies the unibyte +character which, when found on a line of its own in +COOKIES, indicates the border between entries." + (interactive "fCookies file: ") + (setq delim (or delim ?%)) + (let ((delim-line (format "\n%c\n" delim)) + (count 0) + (max 0) + min p q len offsets) + (unless (= 3 (string-bytes delim-line)) + (error "Delimiter cannot be represented in one byte")) + (with-temp-buffer + (insert-file-contents-literally cookies) + (while (and (setq p (point)) + (search-forward delim-line (point-max) t) + (setq len (- (point) 3 p))) + (setq count (1+ count) + max (max max len) + min (min (or min max) len) + offsets (cons (1- p) offsets)))) + (with-temp-buffer + (set-buffer-multibyte nil) + (insert (string-make-unibyte + (bindat-pack + fcookie-index-spec + `((:version . 2) + (:count . ,count) + (:longest . ,max) + (:shortest . ,min) + (:flags . 0) + (:delim . ,delim) + (:offset . ,(mapcar (lambda (o) + (list (cons :foo o))) + (nreverse offsets))))))) + (let ((coding-system-for-write 'raw-text-unix)) + (write-file (or index (concat cookies ".dat"))))))) +@end lisp + +Following is an example of defining and unpacking a complex structure. +Consider the following C structures: + +@example +struct header @{ + unsigned long dest_ip; + unsigned long src_ip; + unsigned short dest_port; + unsigned short src_port; +@}; + +struct data @{ + unsigned char type; + unsigned char opcode; + unsigned long length; /* In little endian order */ + unsigned char id[8]; /* nul-terminated string */ + unsigned char data[/* (length + 3) & ~3 */]; +@}; + +struct packet @{ + struct header header; + unsigned char items; + unsigned char filler[3]; + struct data item[/* items */]; + +@}; +@end example + +The corresponding data layout specification: + +@lisp +(setq header-spec + '((dest-ip ip) + (src-ip ip) + (dest-port u16) + (src-port u16))) + +(setq data-spec + '((type u8) + (opcode u8) + (length u16r) ;; little endian order + (id strz 8) + (data vec (length)) + (align 4))) + +(setq packet-spec + '((header struct header-spec) + (items u8) + (fill 3) + (item repeat (items) + (struct data-spec)))) +@end lisp + +A binary data representation: + +@lisp +(setq binary-data + [ 192 168 1 100 192 168 1 101 01 28 21 32 2 0 0 0 + 2 3 5 0 ?A ?B ?C ?D ?E ?F 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 0 0 + 1 4 7 0 ?B ?C ?D ?E ?F ?G 0 0 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 0 ]) +@end lisp + +The corresponding decoded structure: + +@lisp +(setq decoded-structure (bindat-unpack packet-spec binary-data)) + @result{} +((header + (dest-ip . [192 168 1 100]) + (src-ip . [192 168 1 101]) + (dest-port . 284) + (src-port . 5408)) + (items . 2) + (item ((data . [1 2 3 4 5]) + (id . "ABCDEF") + (length . 5) + (opcode . 3) + (type . 2)) + ((data . [6 7 8 9 10 11 12]) + (id . "BCDEFG") + (length . 7) + (opcode . 4) + (type . 1)))) +@end lisp + +Fetching data from this structure: + +@lisp +(bindat-get-field decoded-structure 'item 1 'id) + @result{} "BCDEFG" +@end lisp + @ignore arch-tag: ba9da253-e65f-4e7f-b727-08fba0a1df7a @end ignore