diff ja/mq.tex @ 324:7dc8a24c70f4

more mq.tex
author Yoshiki Yazawa <yaz@cc.rim.or.jp>
date Fri, 28 Mar 2008 01:13:26 +0900
parents 2d1054e1de5b
children a8269a1b9164
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/ja/mq.tex	Thu Mar 27 22:11:00 2008 +0900
+++ b/ja/mq.tex	Fri Mar 28 01:13:26 2008 +0900
@@ -146,54 +146,96 @@
 \subsection{patchwork quilt$B$+$i(BMercurial Queues$B$X(B}
 \label{sec:mq:quilt-mq}
 
-In mid-2005, Chris Mason took the features of quilt and wrote an
-extension that he called Mercurial Queues, which added quilt-like
-behaviour to Mercurial.
+%In mid-2005, Chris Mason took the features of quilt and wrote an
+%extension that he called Mercurial Queues, which added quilt-like
+%behaviour to Mercurial.
+
+2005$BG/$NCf:"(BChris Mason$B$O!$(Bquilt$B$N5!G=$r<h$jF~$l$F!$(BMercurial$B$K(Bquilt$B$N$h(B
+$B$&$JF0:n$rDI2C$9$k(BMercurial Queues$B$H$$$&%(%/%9%F%s%7%g%s$r=q$$$?!%(B
+
+%The key difference between quilt and MQ is that quilt knows nothing
+%about revision control systems, while MQ is \emph{integrated} into
+%Mercurial.  Each patch that you push is represented as a Mercurial
+%changeset.  Pop a patch, and the changeset goes away.
 
-The key difference between quilt and MQ is that quilt knows nothing
-about revision control systems, while MQ is \emph{integrated} into
-Mercurial.  Each patch that you push is represented as a Mercurial
-changeset.  Pop a patch, and the changeset goes away.
+quilt$B$H(BMQ$B$N0c$$$O!$(Bquilt$B$O%j%S%8%g%s4IM}%7%9%F%`$K$D$$$F2?$b4XCN$7$J$$$N(B
+$B$KBP$7$F!$(BMQ$B$O(BMercurial$B$KE}9g$5$l$F$$$k$3$H$G$"$k!%%W%C%7%e$7$?8D!9$N%Q%C(B
+$B%A$O(BMercurial$B$N%A%'%s%8%;%C%H$H$7$FI=8=$5$l$k!%%Q%C%A$r%]%C%W$9$k$H!$%A%'(B
+$B%s%8%;%C%H$O>C$($F$J$/$J$k!%(B
 
-Because quilt does not care about revision control tools, it is still
-a tremendously useful piece of software to know about for situations
-where you cannot use Mercurial and MQ.
+%Because quilt does not care about revision control tools, it is still
+%a tremendously useful piece of software to know about for situations
+%where you cannot use Mercurial and MQ.
+
+quilt$B$O%j%S%8%g%s4IM}%D!<%k$HL54X78$KMxMQ2DG=$J$?$a!$(BMercurial$B$H(BMQ$B$,;H$((B
+$B$J$$>u67$G$O0MA3$H$7$FHs>o$KM-1W$J%D!<%k$G$"$k$3$H$O5-21$KN1$a$F$*$/$Y$-(B
+$B$G$"$k!%(B
 
 %\section{The huge advantage of MQ}
 \section{MQ$B$NBg$-$JMxE@(B}
 
-I cannot overstate the value that MQ offers through the unification of
-patches and revision control.
+%I cannot overstate the value that MQ offers through the unification of
+%patches and revision control.
+
+MQ$B$,%Q%C%A$H%j%S%8%g%s%3%s%H%m!<%k$NE}9g$K$h$C$F$b$?$i$92ACM$r8XD%$9$k$o(B
+$B$1$K$O$$$+$J$$!%(B
+
+%A major reason that patches have persisted in the free software and
+%open source world---in spite of the availability of increasingly
+%capable revision control tools over the years---is the \emph{agility}
+%they offer.  
 
-A major reason that patches have persisted in the free software and
-open source world---in spite of the availability of increasingly
-capable revision control tools over the years---is the \emph{agility}
-they offer.  
+$B;~$rDI$&Kh$K%j%S%8%g%s%3%s%H%m!<%k%D!<%k$NMxMQ$,9-$,$C$F$$$k$K$b$+$+$o$i(B
+$B$:!$%U%j!<%=%U%H$H%*!<%W%s%=!<%9$N@$3&$K%Q%C%A$,B8:_$9$kBg$-$JM}M3$O$=$N(B
+\emph{$B5!IR$5(B}$B$K$"$k!%(B
 
-Traditional revision control tools make a permanent, irreversible
-record of everything that you do.  While this has great value, it's
-also somewhat stifling.  If you want to perform a wild-eyed
-experiment, you have to be careful in how you go about it, or you risk
-leaving unneeded---or worse, misleading or destabilising---traces of
-your missteps and errors in the permanent revision record.
+%Traditional revision control tools make a permanent, irreversible
+%record of everything that you do.  While this has great value, it's
+%also somewhat stifling.  If you want to perform a wild-eyed
+%experiment, you have to be careful in how you go about it, or you risk
+%leaving unneeded---or worse, misleading or destabilising---traces of
+%your missteps and errors in the permanent revision record.
+
+$BEAE}E*$J%j%S%8%g%s%3%s%H%m!<%k%D!<%k$O!$9T$J$C$?A`:n$N1J5WE*$GIT2D5UE*$J(B
+$B5-O?$r;D$9!%$3$l$K$OBg$-$J2ACM$,$"$k0lJ}$G!$5g6~$K46$8$k$3$H$b$"$k!%$b$7(B
+$B2a7c$J<B83$r$9$k$N$G$"$l$P!$$I$N$h$&$K?J$a$k$+?5=E$K$9$kI,MW$,$"$k!%$5$b(B
+$B$J$1$l$P!$ITMW$J!$$"$k$$$O8m2r$r>7$$$?$j!$0BDj@-$rB;$J$&%H%l!<%9$H%(%i!<(B
+$B$r1J5WE*$J%j%S%8%g%sMzNr$K;D$9$3$H$K$J$k!%(B
 
-By contrast, MQ's marriage of distributed revision control with
-patches makes it much easier to isolate your work.  Your patches live
-on top of normal revision history, and you can make them disappear or
-reappear at will.  If you don't like a patch, you can drop it.  If a
-patch isn't quite as you want it to be, simply fix it---as many times
-as you need to, until you have refined it into the form you desire.
+%By contrast, MQ's marriage of distributed revision control with
+%patches makes it much easier to isolate your work.  Your patches live
+%on top of normal revision history, and you can make them disappear or
+%reappear at will.  If you don't like a patch, you can drop it.  If a
+%patch isn't quite as you want it to be, simply fix it---as many times
+%as you need to, until you have refined it into the form you desire.
+
+$BBP>NE*$K!$(BMQ$B$K$h$kJ,;6%j%S%8%g%s%3%s%H%m!<%k$H%Q%C%A$N7k9g$O!$:n6H$r3VN%(B
+$B$9$k$3$H$rMZ$+$KMF0W$K$9$k!%%Q%C%A$ODL>o$N%j%S%8%g%sMzNr$N>e$K>h$C$F$*$j!$(B
+$BK>$`$h$&$K>CLG$5$;$?$j:F8=$5$;$k$3$H$,$G$-$k!%%Q%C%A$r5$$KF~$i$J$1$l$P!$(B
+$B$3$l$r4~5Q$9$k$3$H$b$G$-$k!%%Q%C%A$,$"$J$?$NK>$`$h$&$J$b$N$G$J$1$l$P!$4u(B
+$BK>DL$j$K$J$k$^$G2?EY$G$b4JC1$K=$@5$9$k$3$H$,$G$-$k!%(B
 
-As an example, the integration of patches with revision control makes
-understanding patches and debugging their effects---and their
-interplay with the code they're based on---\emph{enormously} easier.
-Since every applied patch has an associated changeset, you can use
-\hgcmdargs{log}{\emph{filename}} to see which changesets and patches
-affected a file.  You can use the \hgext{bisect} command to
-binary-search through all changesets and applied patches to see where
-a bug got introduced or fixed.  You can use the \hgcmd{annotate}
-command to see which changeset or patch modified a particular line of
-a source file.  And so on.
+%As an example, the integration of patches with revision control makes
+%understanding patches and debugging their effects---and their
+%interplay with the code they're based on---\emph{enormously} easier.
+%Since every applied patch has an associated changeset, you can use
+%\hgcmdargs{log}{\emph{filename}} to see which changesets and patches
+%affected a file.  You can use the \hgext{bisect} command to
+%binary-search through all changesets and applied patches to see where
+%a bug got introduced or fixed.  You can use the \hgcmd{annotate}
+%command to see which changeset or patch modified a particular line of
+%a source file.  And so on.
+
+$BNc$($P!$%j%S%8%g%s%3%s%H%m!<%k$X$N%Q%C%A$NE}9g$O!$%Q%C%A$rM}2r$7!$$=$N1F(B
+$B6A!$0M$C$FN)$D%Y!<%9%3!<%I$H$NAj8_:nMQ$r%G%P%C%0$9$k$3$H$r2DG=$K$9$k!%E,(B
+$BMQ$5$l$?%Q%C%A$O!$4XO"$E$1$i$l$?%A%'%s%8%;%C%H$r;}$D$?$a!$(B
+\hgcmdargs{log}{\emph{filename}}$B$K$h$C$F$I$N%A%'%s%8%;%C%H$H%Q%C%A$,%U%!(B
+$B%$%k$K1F6A$rM?$($F$$$k$+D4$Y$k$3$H$,$G$-$k!%(B\hgext{bisect}$B%3%^%s%I$GA4$F(B
+$B$N%A%'%s%8%;%C%H$HE,MQ$5$l$?%Q%C%A$KBP$7$F%P%$%J%j%5!<%A$r9T$J$$!$$I$3$G(B
+$B%P%0$,:.F~$7$?$+!$$"$k$$$O=$@5$5$l$?$+$rD4$Y$k$3$H$,$G$-$k!%(B
+\hgcmd{annotate}$B%3%^%s%I$G$I$N%A%'%s%8%;%C%H$+%Q%C%A$,%=!<%9%U%!%$%k$NFC(B
+$BDj$N9T$rJQ99$7$?$+8+$k$3$H$,$G$-$k!%(B
+
 
 %\section{Understanding patches}
 \section{$B%Q%C%A$H$O2?$+(B}