Mercurial > hgbook
diff en/appA-svn.xml @ 814:e9154b3daa94
Repurpose appendix A.
author | Bryan O'Sullivan <bos@serpentine.com> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 26 Apr 2009 23:16:56 -0700 |
parents | en/appA-cmdref.xml@b338f5490029 |
children | 0ffae4ee4c47 |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/en/appA-svn.xml Sun Apr 26 23:16:56 2009 -0700 @@ -0,0 +1,441 @@ +<!-- vim: set filetype=docbkxml shiftwidth=2 autoindent expandtab tw=77 : --> + +<appendix id="svn"> + <?dbhtml filename="mercurial-for-subversion-users.html"?> +<title>Migrating to Mercurial</title> + + <para>A common way to test the waters with a new revision control + tool is to experiment with switching an existing project, rather + than starting a new project from scratch.</para> + + <para>In this appendix, we discuss how to import a project's history + into Mercurial, and what to look out for if you are used to a + different revision control system.</para> + + <sect1> + <title>Importing history from another system</title> + + <para>Mercurial ships with an extension named + <literal>convert</literal>, which can import project history + from most popular revision control systems. At the time this + book was written, it could import history from the following + systems:</para> + <itemizedlist> + <listitem> + <para>Subversion</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>CVS</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>git</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Darcs</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Bazaar</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Monotone</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>GNU Arch</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Mercurial</para> + </listitem> + </itemizedlist> + + <para>(To see why Mercurial itself is supported as a source, see + <xref linkend="svn.filemap"/>.)</para> + + <para>You can enable the extension in the usual way, by editing + your <filename>~/.hgrc</filename> file.</para> + + <programlisting>[extensions] +convert =</programlisting> + + <para>This will make a <command>hg convert</command> command + available. The command is easy to use. For instance, this + command will import the Subversion history for the Nose unit + testing framework into Mercurial.</para> + + <screen><prompt>$</prompt> <userinput>hg convert http://python-nose.googlecode.com/svn/trunk</userinput></screen> + + <para>The <literal>convert</literal> extension operates + incrementally. In other words, after you have run <command>hg + convert</command> once, running it again will import any new + revisions committed after the first run began. Incremental + conversion will only work if you run <command>hg + convert</command> in the same Mercurial repository that you + originally used, because the <literal>convert</literal> + extension saves some private metadata in a + non-revision-controlled file named + <filename>.hg/shamap</filename> inside the target + repository.</para> + + <sect2> + <title>Mapping user names</title> + + <para>Some revision control tools save only short usernames with + commits, and these can be difficult to interpret. The norm + with Mercurial is to save a committer's name and email + address, which is much more useful for talking to them after + the fact.</para> + + <para>If you are converting a tree from a revision control + system that uses short names, you can map those names to + longer equivalents by passing a <option>--authors</option> + option to <command>hg convert</command>. This option accepts + a file name that should contain entries of the following + form.</para> + + <programlisting>arist = Aristotle <aristotle@phil.example.gr> +soc = Socrates <socrates@phil.example.gr></programlisting> + + <para>Whenever <literal>convert</literal> encounters a commit + with the username <literal>arist</literal> in the source + repository, it will use the name <literal>Aristotle + <aristotle@phil.example.gr></literal> in the converted + Mercurial revision. If no match is found for a name, it is + used verbatim.</para> + </sect2> + + <sect2 id="svn.filemap"> + <title>Tidying up the tree</title> + + <para>Not all projects have pristine history. There may be a + directory that should never have been checked in, a file that + is too big, or a whole hierarchy that needs to be + refactored.</para> + + <para>The <literal>convert</literal> extension supports the idea + of a <quote>file map</quote> that can reorganize the files and + directories in a project as it imports the project's history. + This is useful not only when importing history from other + revision control systems, but also to prune or refactor a + Mercurial tree.</para> + + <para>To specify a file map, use the <option>--filemap</option> + option and supply a file name. A file map contains lines of the + following forms.</para> + + <programlisting># This is a comment. +# Empty lines are ignored. + +include path/to/file + +exclude path/to/file + +rename from/some/path to/some/other/place +</programlisting> + + <para>The <literal>include</literal> directive causes a file, or + all files under a directory, to be included in the destination + repository. This also excludes all other files and dirs not + explicitely included. The <literal>exclude</literal> + directive causes files or directories to be omitted, and + others not explicitly mentioned to be included.</para> + + <para>To move a file or directory from one location to another, + use the <literal>rename</literal> directive. If you need to + move a file or directory from a subdirectory into the root of + the repository, use <literal>.</literal> as the second + argument to the <literal>rename</literal> directive.</para> + </sect2> + </sect1> + + <sect1> + <title>Migrating from Subversion</title> + + <para>Subversion is currently the most popular open source + revision control system. Although there are many differences + between Mercurial and Subversion, making the transition from + Subversion to Mercurial is not particularly difficult. The two + have similar command sets and generally uniform + interfaces.</para> + + <sect2> + <title>Philosophical differences</title> + + <para>The fundamental difference between Subversion and + Mercurial is of course that Subversion is centralized, while + Mercurial is distributed. Since Mercurial stores all of a + project's history on your local drive, it only needs to + perform a network access when you want to explicitly + communicate with another repository. In contrast, Subversion + stores very little information locally, and the client must + thus contact its server for many common operations.</para> + + <para>Subversion more or less gets away without a well-defined + notion of a branch: which portion of a server's namespace + qualifies as a branch is a matter of convention, with the + software providing no enforcement. Mercurial treats a + repository as the unit of branch management.</para> + + <sect3> + <title>Scope of commands</title> + + <para>Since Subversion doesn't know what parts of its + namespace are really branches, it treats most commands as + requests to operate at and below whatever directory you are + currently visiting. For instance, if you run <command>svn + log</command>, you'll get the history of whatever part of + the tree you're looking at, not the tree as a whole.</para> + + <para>Mercurial's commands behave differently, by defaulting + to operating over an entire repository. Run <command>hg + log</command> and it will tell you the history of the + entire tree, no matter what part of the working directory + you're visiting at the time. If you want the history of + just a particular file or directory, simply supply it by + name, e.g. <command>hg log src</command>.</para> + + <para>From my own experience, this difference in default + behaviors is probably the most likely to trip you up if you + have to switch back and forth frequently between the two + tools.</para> + </sect3> + + <sect3> + <title>Multi-user operation and safety</title> + + <para>With Subversion, it is normal (though slightly frowned + upon) for multiple people to collaborate in a single branch. + If Alice and Bob are working together, and Alice commits + some changes to their shared branch, Bob must update his + client's view of the branch before he can commit. Since at + this time he has no permanent record of the changes he has + made, he can corrupt or lose his modifications during and + after his update.</para> + + <para>Mercurial encourages a commit-then-merge model instead. + Bob commits his changes locally before pulling changes from, + or pushing them to, the server that he shares with Alice. + If Alice pushed her changes before Bob tries to push his, he + will not be able to push his changes until he pulls hers, + merges with them, and commits the result of the merge. If + he makes a mistake during the merge, he still has the option + of reverting to the commit that recorded his changes.</para> + + <para>It is worth emphasizing that these are the common ways + of working with these tools. Subversion supports a safer + work-in-your-own-branch model, but it is cumbersome enough + in practice to not be widely used. Mercurial can support + the less safe mode of allowing changes to be pulled in and + merged on top of uncommitted edits, but this is considered + highly unusual.</para> + </sect3> + + <sect3> + <title>Published vs local changes</title> + + <para>A Subversion <command>svn commit</command> command + immediately publishes changes to a server, where they can be + seen by everyone who has read access.</para> + + <para>With Mercurial, commits are always local, and must be + published via a <command>hg push</command> command + afterwards.</para> + + <para>Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages. The + Subversion model means that changes are published, and hence + reviewable and usable, immediately. On the other hand, this + means that a user must have commit access to a repository in + order to use the software in a normal way, and commit access + is not lightly given out by most open source + projects.</para> + + <para>The Mercurial approach allows anyone who can clone a + repository to commit changes without the need for someone + else's permission, and they can then publish their changes + and continue to participate however they see fit. The + distinction between committing and pushing does open up the + possibility of someone committing changes to their laptop + and walking away for a few days having forgotten to push + them, which in rare cases might leave collaborators + temporarily stuck.</para> + </sect3> + </sect2> + + <sect2> + <title>Quick reference</title> + + <table> + <title>Subversion commands and Mercurial equivalents</title> + <tgroup cols="3"> + <thead> + <row> + <entry>Subversion</entry> + <entry>Mercurial</entry> + <entry>Notes</entry> + </row> + </thead> + <tbody> + <row> + <entry><command>svn add</command></entry> + <entry><command>hg add</command></entry> + <entry></entry> + </row> + <row> + <entry><command>svn blame</command></entry> + <entry><command>hg annotate</command></entry> + <entry></entry> + </row> + <row> + <entry><command>svn cat</command></entry> + <entry><command>hg cat</command></entry> + <entry></entry> + </row> + <row> + <entry><command>svn checkout</command></entry> + <entry><command>hg clone</command></entry> + <entry></entry> + </row> + <row> + <entry><command>svn cleanup</command></entry> + <entry>n/a</entry> + <entry>No cleanup needed</entry> + </row> + <row> + <entry><command>svn commit</command></entry> + <entry><command>hg commit</command>; <command>hg + push</command></entry> + <entry><command>hg push</command> publishes after + commit</entry> + </row> + <row> + <entry><command>svn copy</command></entry> + <entry><command>hg clone</command></entry> + <entry>To create a new branch</entry> + </row> + <row> + <entry><command>svn copy</command></entry> + <entry><command>hg copy</command></entry> + <entry>To copy files or directories</entry> + </row> + <row> + <entry><command>svn delete</command> (<command>svn + remove</command>)</entry> + <entry><command>hg remove</command></entry> + <entry></entry> + </row> + <row> + <entry><command>svn diff</command></entry> + <entry><command>hg diff</command></entry> + <entry></entry> + </row> + <row> + <entry><command>svn export</command></entry> + <entry><command>hg archive</command></entry> + <entry></entry> + </row> + <row> + <entry><command>svn help</command></entry> + <entry><command>hg help</command></entry> + <entry></entry> + </row> + <row> + <entry><command>svn import</command></entry> + <entry><command>hg addremove</command>; <command>hg + commit</command></entry> + <entry></entry> + </row> + <row> + <entry><command>svn info</command></entry> + <entry><command>hg parents</command></entry> + <entry>Shows what revision is checked out</entry> + </row> + <row> + <entry><command>svn info</command></entry> + <entry><command>hg showconfig + paths.parent</command></entry> + <entry>Shows what URL is checked out</entry> + </row> + <row> + <entry><command>svn list</command></entry> + <entry><command>hg manifest</command></entry> + <entry></entry> + </row> + <row> + <entry><command>svn log</command></entry> + <entry><command>hg log</command></entry> + <entry></entry> + </row> + <row> + <entry><command>svn merge</command></entry> + <entry><command>hg merge</command></entry> + <entry></entry> + </row> + <row> + <entry><command>svn mkdir</command></entry> + <entry>n/a</entry> + <entry>Mercurial does not track directories</entry> + </row> + <row> + <entry><command>svn move</command> (<command>svn + rename</command>)</entry> + <entry><command>hg rename</command></entry> + <entry></entry> + </row> + <row> + <entry><command>svn resolved</command></entry> + <entry><command>hg resolve -m</command></entry> + <entry></entry> + </row> + <row> + <entry><command>svn revert</command></entry> + <entry><command>hg revert</command></entry> + <entry></entry> + </row> + <row> + <entry><command>svn status</command></entry> + <entry><command>hg status</command></entry> + <entry></entry> + </row> + <row> + <entry><command>svn update</command></entry> + <entry><command>hg pull -u</command></entry> + <entry></entry> + </row> + </tbody> + </tgroup> + </table> + </sect2> + </sect1> + + <sect1> + <title>Useful tips for newcomers</title> + + <para>Under some revision control systems, printing a diff for a + single committed revision can be painful. For instance, with + Subversion, to see what changed in revision 104654, you must + type <command>svn diff -r104653:104654</command>. Mercurial + eliminates the need to type the revision ID twice in this common + case. For a plain diff, <command>hg export 104654</command>. For + a log message followed by a diff, <command>hg log -r104654 + -p</command>.</para> + + <para>When you run <command>hg status</command> without any + arguments, it prints the status of the entire tree, with paths + relative to the root of the repository. This makes it tricky to + copy a file name from the output of <command>hg status</command> + into the command line. If you supply a file or directory name + to <command>hg status</command>, it will print paths relative to + your current location instead. So to get tree-wide status from + <command>hg status</command>, with paths that are relative to + your current directory and not the root of the repository, feed + the output of <command>hg root</command> into <command>hg + status</command>. You can easily do this as follows on a + Unix-like system:</para> + + <screen><prompt>$</prompt> <userinput>hg status `hg root`</userinput></screen> + </sect1> +</appendix> + +<!-- +local variables: +sgml-parent-document: ("00book.xml" "book" "appendix") +end: +-->