# HG changeset patch # User Yoshiki Yazawa # Date 1245309838 -32400 # Node ID 40229e419ca6f153ea0d2f5ad7bed45ff97a0d3f # Parent ac38c95a2ace690156c58ee5b6afc3ecae610c6b Propagate 22ecadf9f413 Another obsolete SVN merge comment fixed diff -r ac38c95a2ace -r 40229e419ca6 ja/intro.tex --- a/ja/intro.tex Thu Jun 18 16:23:58 2009 +0900 +++ b/ja/intro.tex Thu Jun 18 16:23:58 2009 +0900 @@ -942,15 +942,12 @@ %As an example, Subversion is a good choice for working with frequently %edited binary files, due to its centralised nature and support for %file locking. If you're averse to the command line, it currently has -%better GUI support than other free revision control tools. However, -%its poor merging is a substantial liability for busy projects with -%overlapping development. +%better GUI support than other free revision control tools. 例えば,頻繁に変更されるバイナリファイルを扱う場合はSubverrsionを選ぶのが 良い.Subversionの集中型の性質とファイルロックのサポートはバイナリファイ ルの取り扱いに適している.コマンドラインが嫌いならば,他のフリーリビジョ -ン管理ツールよりも優れたGUIサポートがある.しかしマージ機構の弱さは同時に -並行した開発では少なからぬ問題となりうる. +ン管理ツールよりも優れたGUIサポートがある. %I personally find Mercurial's properties of simplicity, performance, %and good merge support to be a compelling combination that has served