changeset 380:38f034c1da53

finished daily.tex
author Yoshiki Yazawa <yaz@honeyplanet.jp>
date Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:37:50 +0900
parents beab196f78da
children 991befd0025c
files ja/daily.tex ja/todo.txt
diffstat 2 files changed, 306 insertions(+), 140 deletions(-) [+]
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/ja/daily.tex	Thu Jan 15 16:34:43 2009 +0900
+++ b/ja/daily.tex	Thu Feb 19 14:37:50 2009 +0900
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
 $BDL$7$F$$$k!%(B
 
 %\subsection{Aside: Mercurial tracks files, not directories}
-\subsection{$BM>CL(B: Mercurial$B$O%G%#%l%/%H%j$G$O$J$/%U%!%$%k$rDI@W$9$k(B}
+\subsection{$B$3$\$lOC(B: Mercurial$B$O%G%#%l%/%H%j$G$O$J$/%U%!%$%k$rDI@W$9$k(B}
 
 %Mercurial does not track directory information.  Instead, it tracks
 %the path to a file.  Before creating a file, it first creates any
@@ -150,80 +150,131 @@
 %\section{How to stop tracking a file}
 \section{$B%U%!%$%kDI@W$NDd;_(B}
 
-Once you decide that a file no longer belongs in your repository, use
-the \hgcmd{remove} command; this deletes the file, and tells Mercurial
-to stop tracking it.  A removed file is represented in the output of
-\hgcmd{status} with a ``\texttt{R}''.
+%Once you decide that a file no longer belongs in your repository, use
+%the \hgcmd{remove} command; this deletes the file, and tells Mercurial
+%to stop tracking it.  A removed file is represented in the output of
+%\hgcmd{status} with a ``\texttt{R}''.
+%\interaction{daily.files.remove}
+
+$B%U%!%$%k$,%j%]%8%H%j$KI,MW$J$/$J$C$?;~$O(B\hgcmd{remove}$B%3%^%s%I$r<B9T$9(B
+$B$k!%$3$N%3%^%s%I$O%U%!%$%k$r:o=|$7$?>e$G(BMercurial$B$K%U%!%$%kDI@W$NDd;_$r;X(B
+$B<($9$k!%:o=|$5$l$?%U%!%$%k$O(B\hgcmd{status}$B%3%^%s%I$N=PNO$G(B``\texttt{R}''
+$B$HI=<($5$l$k!%(B
 \interaction{daily.files.remove}
 
-After you \hgcmd{remove} a file, Mercurial will no longer track
-changes to that file, even if you recreate a file with the same name
-in your working directory.  If you do recreate a file with the same
-name and want Mercurial to track the new file, simply \hgcmd{add} it.
-Mercurial will know that the newly added file is not related to the
-old file of the same name.
+%After you \hgcmd{remove} a file, Mercurial will no longer track
+%changes to that file, even if you recreate a file with the same name
+%in your working directory.  If you do recreate a file with the same
+%name and want Mercurial to track the new file, simply \hgcmd{add} it.
+%Mercurial will know that the newly added file is not related to the
+%old file of the same name.
+
+$B0lEY%U%!%$%k$r(B\hgcmd{remove}$B$7$?8e$G$O!$(BMercurial$B$O%o!<%-%s%0%G%#%l%/%H%j(B
+$BFb$K$?$H$(F1$8L>A0$G%U%!%$%k$,:F@8@.$5$l$F$b%U%!%$%k$X$NJQ99$rDI@W$7$J$$!%(B
+$B%U%!%$%k$r:F@8@.$7!$(BMercurial$B$KDI@W$5$;$?$$$N$G$"$l$P!$(B\hgcmd{add}$B$r9T$&!%(B
+Mercurial$B$O!$?75,$KDI2C$5$l$?%U%!%$%k$rF1L>$N8E$$%U%!%$%k$H4X78$J$/07$&!%(B
 
 %\subsection{Removing a file does not affect its history}
 \subsection{$B%U%!%$%k:o=|$OMzNr$K1F6A$rM?$($J$$(B}
 
-It is important to understand that removing a file has only two
-effects.
+%It is important to understand that removing a file has only two
+%effects.
+$B%U%!%$%k$N:o=|$,%j%]%8%H%j$KM?$($k1F6A$O(B2$B$D$N$_$G$"$k!%(B
 \begin{itemize}
-\item It removes the current version of the file from the working
-  directory.
-\item It stops Mercurial from tracking changes to the file, from the
-  time of the next commit.
+%\item It removes the current version of the file from the working
+%  directory.
+ \item $B%o!<%-%s%0%G%#%l%/%H%j$+$i869F$N%P!<%8%g%s$N%U%!%$%k$r>C5n$9$k!%(B
+%\item It stops Mercurial from tracking changes to the file, from the
+%  time of the next commit.
+ \item $B:o=|$9$k%U%!%$%k$X$NJQ99$r<!2s$N%3%_%C%H$+$i(BMercurial$B$,DI@W$7$J$$(B
+       $B$h$&$K$9$k!%(B
 \end{itemize}
-Removing a file \emph{does not} in any way alter the \emph{history} of
-the file.
+%Removing a file \emph{does not} in any way alter the \emph{history} of
+%the file.
+$B%U%!%$%k$r$I$N$h$&$K:o=|$7$F$b%U%!%$%k$N(B\emph{$BMzNr(B}$B$OJQ99(B\emph{$B$5$l$J$$(B}$B!%(B
 
-If you update the working directory to a changeset in which a file
-that you have removed was still tracked, it will reappear in the
-working directory, with the contents it had when you committed that
-changeset.  If you then update the working directory to a later
-changeset, in which the file had been removed, Mercurial will once
-again remove the file from the working directory.
+%If you update the working directory to a changeset in which a file
+%that you have removed was still tracked, it will reappear in the
+%working directory, with the contents it had when you committed that
+%changeset.  If you then update the working directory to a later
+%changeset, in which the file had been removed, Mercurial will once
+%again remove the file from the working directory.
+
+$B%o!<%-%s%0%G%#%l%/%H%j$r!$>C5n$7$?%U%!%$%k$r4^$`%A%'%s%8%;%C%H$K99?7$9$k(B
+$B$H!$%U%!%$%k$O$=$N%A%'%s%8%;%C%H$G$NFbMF$G:F$S%o!<%-%s%0%G%#%l%/%H%j$K8=(B
+$B$l$k!%$=$3$G%U%!%$%k$,>C5n$5$l$F$$$k8e$N%A%'%s%8%;%C%H$K99?7$9$k(B
+$B$H!$(BMercurial$B$O%U%!%$%k$r:F$S%o!<%-%s%0%G%#%l%/%H%j$+$i>C5n$9$k!%(B
 
 %\subsection{Missing files}
 \subsection{$B7gMn$7$?%U%!%$%k(B}
 
-Mercurial considers a file that you have deleted, but not used
-\hgcmd{remove} to delete, to be \emph{missing}.  A missing file is
-represented with ``\texttt{!}'' in the output of \hgcmd{status}.
-Mercurial commands will not generally do anything with missing files.
+%Mercurial considers a file that you have deleted, but not used
+%\hgcmd{remove} to delete, to be \emph{missing}.  A missing file is
+%represented with ``\texttt{!}'' in the output of \hgcmd{status}.
+%Mercurial commands will not generally do anything with missing files.
+%\interaction{daily.files.missing}
+
+Mercurial$B$O!$(B\hgcmd{remove}$B$r;H$o$:$K>C5n$5$l$?%U%!%$%k$r(B\emph{$B7gMn(B}$B$7$?(B
+$B%U%!%$%k$H$7$F07$&!%7gMn%U%!%$%k$O(B\hgcmd{status}$B%3%^%s%I$N=PNO$G(B
+``\texttt{!}''$B$HI=<($5$l$k!%(BMercurial$B$N%3%^%s%I$O!$DL>o!$7gMn$7$?%U%!%$(B
+$B%k$K$O2?$b9T$o$J$$!%(B
 \interaction{daily.files.missing}
 
-If your repository contains a file that \hgcmd{status} reports as
-missing, and you want the file to stay gone, you can run
-\hgcmdargs{remove}{\hgopt{remove}{--after}} at any time later on, to
-tell Mercurial that you really did mean to remove the file.
+%If your repository contains a file that \hgcmd{status} reports as
+%missing, and you want the file to stay gone, you can run
+%\hgcmdargs{remove}{\hgopt{remove}{--after}} at any time later on, to
+%tell Mercurial that you really did mean to remove the file.
+%\interaction{daily.files.remove-after}
+
+$B%j%]%8%H%jFb$G(B\hgcmd{status}$B%3%^%s%I$,7gMn$H%j%]!<%H$9$k%U%!%$%k$,$"$k>l(B
+$B9g!$(B\hgcmdargs{remove}{\hgopt{remove}{--after}}$B$r<B9T$7$F!$(BMercurial$B$K7g(B
+$BMn%U%!%$%k$,>C5n$5$l$?$b$N$G$"$k$3$H$r;X<($9$k$3$H$,$G$-$k!%(B
 \interaction{daily.files.remove-after}
 
-On the other hand, if you deleted the missing file by accident, use
-\hgcmdargs{revert}{\emph{filename}} to recover the file.  It will
-reappear, in unmodified form.
+%On the other hand, if you deleted the missing file by accident, use
+%\hgcmdargs{revert}{\emph{filename}} to recover the file.  It will
+%reappear, in unmodified form.
+%\interaction{daily.files.recover-missing}
+
+$B0lJ}$G!$8m$C$F%U%!%$%k$r>C5n$7$?>l9g!$(B\hgcmdargs{revert}{\emph{filename}}$B$r(B
+$B<B9T$9$k$3$H$G%U%!%$%k$r=$I|$9$k$3$H$,$G$-$k!%%U%!%$%k$O2?$bJQ99$5$l$J$$>uBV(B
+$B$G=$I|$5$l$k!%(B
 \interaction{daily.files.recover-missing}
 
 %\subsection{Aside: why tell Mercurial explicitly to remove a file?}
 \subsection{$B$3$\$lOC(B: $B$J$<(BMercurial$B$X%U%!%$%k$N:o=|$rL@<(E*$K;X<($7$J$1(B
   $B$l$P$J$i$J$$$+(B}
 
-You might wonder why Mercurial requires you to explicitly tell it that
-you are deleting a file.  Early during the development of Mercurial,
-it let you delete a file however you pleased; Mercurial would notice
-the absence of the file automatically when you next ran a
-\hgcmd{commit}, and stop tracking the file.  In practice, this made it
-too easy to accidentally remove a file without noticing.
+%You might wonder why Mercurial requires you to explicitly tell it that
+%you are deleting a file.  Early during the development of Mercurial,
+%it let you delete a file however you pleased; Mercurial would notice
+%the absence of the file automatically when you next ran a
+%\hgcmd{commit}, and stop tracking the file.  In practice, this made it
+%too easy to accidentally remove a file without noticing.
+
+$B$J$<(BMercurial$B$K%U%!%$%k$N:o=|$rL@<(E*$K;X<($7$J$1$l$P$J$i$J$$$N$@$m$&$+!)(B
+Mercurial$B$N3+H/$N=i4|$K$O!$%U%!%$%k$,$J$$$3$H$r8!CN$9$k$H!$<!$K(B
+\hgcmd{commit}$B$,<B9T$5$l$k;~$K<+F0E*$K%U%!%$%k$NDI@W$r$d$a$F$$$?!%<B:]$K(B
+$B;H$C$F$_$k$H$3$NF0:n$G$O%U%!%$%k$rCN$i$:$N$&$A$K<:$&$3$H$,IQH/$7$?$N$G$"(B
+$B$k!%(B
 
 %\subsection{Useful shorthand---adding and removing files in one step}
 \subsection{$BLr$KN)$D4JN,K!(B---$B%U%!%$%k$NDI2C$H:o=|$r(B1$B%9%F%C%W$G9T$&(B}
 
-Mercurial offers a combination command, \hgcmd{addremove}, that adds
-untracked files and marks missing files as removed.
+%Mercurial offers a combination command, \hgcmd{addremove}, that adds
+%untracked files and marks missing files as removed.
+%\interaction{daily.files.addremove}
+%The \hgcmd{commit} command also provides a \hgopt{commit}{-A} option
+%that performs this same add-and-remove, immediately followed by a
+%commit.
+%\interaction{daily.files.commit-addremove}
+
+Mercurial$B$O(B\hgcmd{addremove}$B$H$$$&AH$_9g$o$;%3%^%s%I$r;}$C$F$$$k!%$3$N%3(B
+$B%^%s%I$ODI@W$5$l$F$$$J$$%U%!%$%k72$rDI2C$7!$7gMn$7$F$$$k%U%!%$%k$r>C5n$5(B
+$B$l$?$H%^!<%/$9$k!%(B
 \interaction{daily.files.addremove}
-The \hgcmd{commit} command also provides a \hgopt{commit}{-A} option
-that performs this same add-and-remove, immediately followed by a
-commit.
+\hgcmd{commit}$B%3%^%s%I$K$O(B\hgopt{commit}{-A}$B%*%W%7%g%s$,$"$j!$F1$8DI2C$H(B
+$B:o=|$NA`:n$r%3%_%C%HD>8e$K9T$&!%(B
 \interaction{daily.files.commit-addremove}
 
 %\section{Copying files}
@@ -243,141 +294,256 @@
 %\subsection{The results of copying during a merge}
 \subsection{$B%^!<%8Cf$N%3%T!<$N7k2L(B}
 
-What happens during a merge is that changes ``follow'' a copy.  To
-best illustrate what this means, let's create an example.  We'll start
-with the usual tiny repository that contains a single file.
+%What happens during a merge is that changes ``follow'' a copy.  To
+%best illustrate what this means, let's create an example.  We'll start
+%with the usual tiny repository that contains a single file.
+%\interaction{daily.copy.init}
+%We need to do some work in parallel, so that we'll have something to
+%merge.  So let's clone our repository.
+%\interaction{daily.copy.clone}
+%Back in our initial repository, let's use the \hgcmd{copy} command to
+%make a copy of the first file we created.
+%\interaction{daily.copy.copy}
+
+$B%^!<%8Cf$K$O!$%3%T!<$K(B``$B=>$&(B''$B$3$H$,5/$-$k!%$3$l$N0UL#$9$k$H$3$m$r<($9$?(B
+$B$a$K!$Nc$r5s$2$k$3$H$K$9$k!%$$$D$b$N$h$&$K!$%U%!%$%k(B1$B$D$@$1$r4^$`>.$5$J%j(B
+$B%]%8%H%j$r:n@.$9$k!%(B
 \interaction{daily.copy.init}
-We need to do some work in parallel, so that we'll have something to
-merge.  So let's clone our repository.
+$B%^!<%8$9$Y$-FbMF$r:n$k$?$a$KJB9T$7$F$$$/$D$+$N:n6H$r9T$&I,MW$,$"$k$N$G!$(B
+$B%j%]%8%H%j$N%/%m!<%s$r9T$&!%(B
 \interaction{daily.copy.clone}
-Back in our initial repository, let's use the \hgcmd{copy} command to
-make a copy of the first file we created.
+$B:G=i$N%j%]%8%H%j$KLa$C$F!$(B\hgcmd{copy}$B%3%^%s%I$r;H$C$F!$:n@.$7$?%U%!%$%k(B
+$B$N%3%T!<$r9T$&!%(B
 \interaction{daily.copy.copy}
 
-If we look at the output of the \hgcmd{status} command afterwards, the
-copied file looks just like a normal added file.
+%If we look at the output of the \hgcmd{status} command afterwards, the
+%copied file looks just like a normal added file.
+%\interaction{daily.copy.status}
+%But if we pass the \hgopt{status}{-C} option to \hgcmd{status}, it
+%prints another line of output: this is the file that our newly-added
+%file was copied \emph{from}.
+%\interaction{daily.copy.status-copy}
+
+$B$=$N8e$G(B\hgcmd{status}$B%3%^%s%I$N=PNO$r8+$k$H%3%T!<$5$l$?%U%!%$%k$ODL>oDL(B
+$B$j$KDI2C$5$l$?%U%!%$%k$H$7$F8+$($k!%(B
 \interaction{daily.copy.status}
-But if we pass the \hgopt{status}{-C} option to \hgcmd{status}, it
-prints another line of output: this is the file that our newly-added
-file was copied \emph{from}.
+$B$7$+$7(B\hgcmd{status}$B%3%^%s%I$K(B\hgopt{status}{-C}$B%*%W%7%g%s$rEO$9$H!$?7$?(B
+$B$KDI2C$5$l$?%U%!%$%k$,(B\emph{$B$I$N(B}$B%U%!%$%k$+$i%3%T!<$5$l$?$N$+$r<($99T$,(B
+$B=PNO$5$l$k!%(B
 \interaction{daily.copy.status-copy}
 
-Now, back in the repository we cloned, let's make a change in
-parallel.  We'll add a line of content to the original file that we
-created.
+%Now, back in the repository we cloned, let's make a change in
+%parallel.  We'll add a line of content to the original file that we
+%created.
+%\interaction{daily.copy.other}
+%Now we have a modified \filename{file} in this repository.  When we
+%pull the changes from the first repository, and merge the two heads,
+%Mercurial will propagate the changes that we made locally to
+%\filename{file} into its copy, \filename{new-file}.
+%\interaction{daily.copy.merge}
+
+$B$3$3$G%/%m!<%s$7$?%j%]%8%H%j$K$bJQ99$r2C$($k!%:n@.$7$?%U%!%$%k$K0l9T$rDI(B
+$B2C$9$k!%(B
 \interaction{daily.copy.other}
-Now we have a modified \filename{file} in this repository.  When we
-pull the changes from the first repository, and merge the two heads,
-Mercurial will propagate the changes that we made locally to
-\filename{file} into its copy, \filename{new-file}.
+$B$3$l$G$3$N%j%]%8%H%j$K$bJQ99$5$l$?(B\filename{file}$B$,B8:_$9$k$3$H$K$J(B
+$B$k!%$3$3$G:G=i$N%j%]%8%H%j$+$iJQ99$r(Bpull$B$7!$(B2$B$D$N(Bhead$B$r%^!<%8$9$k$H(B
+Mercurial$B$O%m!<%+%k$J(B\filename{file}$B$KBP$9$kJQ99$r$=$N%3%T!<(B
+\filename{new-file}$B$KGH5Z$5$;$k!%(B
 \interaction{daily.copy.merge}
 
 %\subsection{Why should changes follow copies?}
 \subsection{$BJQ99$O$J$<%3%T!<$K=>$o$J$1$l$P$J$i$J$$$+(B}
 \label{sec:daily:why-copy}
 
-This behaviour, of changes to a file propagating out to copies of the
-file, might seem esoteric, but in most cases it's highly desirable.
+%This behaviour, of changes to a file propagating out to copies of the
+%file, might seem esoteric, but in most cases it's highly desirable.
+
+$B%U%!%$%k$X$NJQ99$,$=$N%3%T!<$XGH5Z$9$kF0:n$OFq2r$K;W$($k$+$b$7$J$$$,!$B?(B
+$B$/$N>l9g$OHs>o$KK>$^$7$$F0:n$G$"$k!%(B
+
+%First of all, remember that this propagation \emph{only} happens when
+%you merge.  So if you \hgcmd{copy} a file, and subsequently modify the
+%original file during the normal course of your work, nothing will
+%happen.
 
-First of all, remember that this propagation \emph{only} happens when
-you merge.  So if you \hgcmd{copy} a file, and subsequently modify the
-original file during the normal course of your work, nothing will
-happen.
+$B$^$:Bh0l$K$3$NGH5Z$O%^!<%8$r9T$&$H$-$K(B\emph{$B$N$_(B}$BH/@8$9$k!%=>$C$F%U%!%$%k(B
+$B$r(B\hgcmd{copy}$B$9$k>l9g$d!$DL>o$N:n6H$G%*%j%8%J%k%U%!%$%k$rJQ99$9$k>l9g$O(B
+$B2?$b5/$-$J$$!%(B
+
+%The second thing to know is thatmodifications will only propagate
+%across a copy as long as the repository that you're pulling changes
+%from \emph{doesn't know} about the copy.
 
-The second thing to know is that modifications will only propagate
-across a copy as long as the repository that you're pulling changes
-from \emph{doesn't know} about the copy.
+$BCN$C$F$*$/$Y$-E@$N(B2$B$DL\$O!$JQ99$r(Bpull$B$9$k%j%]%8%H%j$,!$%3%T!<$K$D$$$F(B
+\emph{$B4XCN$7$J$$(B}$B8B$j!$JQ99$OGH5Z$9$k$H$$$&$3$H$G$"$k!%(B
+
+%The reason that Mercurial does this is as follows.  Let's say I make
+%an important bug fix in a source file, and commit my changes.
+%Meanwhile, you've decided to \hgcmd{copy} the file in your repository,
+%without knowing about the bug or having seen the fix, and you have
+%started hacking on your copy of the file.
 
-The reason that Mercurial does this is as follows.  Let's say I make
-an important bug fix in a source file, and commit my changes.
-Meanwhile, you've decided to \hgcmd{copy} the file in your repository,
-without knowing about the bug or having seen the fix, and you have
-started hacking on your copy of the file.
+Mercurial$B$,$3$N$h$&$KF0:n$9$kM}M3$r@bL@$9$k!%:#!$;d$,=EMW$J%P%0=$@5$r(B1$B$D(B
+$B$N%=!<%9%U%!%$%k$K$D$$$F9T$$!$JQ99$r%3%_%C%H$7$?$H$9$k!%$=$N4V!$$"$J$?$O(B
+$B<+J,$N%j%]%8%H%j$NCf$G!$$=$N%P%0$"$k$$$O=$@5$rCN$i$:!$$=$N%U%!%$%k$N(B
+\hgcmd{copy}$B$r9T$$!$%U%!%$%k$NJQ99$r;O$a$?$H$9$k!%(B
 
-If you pulled and merged my changes, and Mercurial \emph{didn't}
-propagate changes across copies, your source file would now contain
-the bug, and unless you remembered to propagate the bug fix by hand,
-the bug would \emph{remain} in your copy of the file.
+%If you pulled and merged my changes, and Mercurial \emph{didn't}
+%propagate changes across copies, your source file would now contain
+%the bug, and unless you remembered to propagate the bug fix by hand,
+%the bug would \emph{remain} in your copy of the file.
+
+$B$"$J$?$,;d$N9T$C$?JQ99$r(Bpull$B$7!$(Bmerge$B$7$?>l9g!$(BMercurial$B$OJQ99$r%3%T!<4V(B
+$B$GGH5Z$5$;$J$$!%$"$J$?$N%=!<%9%U%!%$%k:#%P%0$r;}$C$F$$$k$+$b$7$l$J$$$,!$(B
+$B%P%0=$@5$r<j$GGH5Z$5$;$J$1$l$P%P%0$O%U%!%$%k$N%3%T!<$K(B\emph{$B;D$k(B}$B!%(B
 
-By automatically propagating the change that fixed the bug from the
-original file to the copy, Mercurial prevents this class of problem.
-To my knowledge, Mercurial is the \emph{only} revision control system
-that propagates changes across copies like this.
+%By automatically propagating the change that fixed the bug from the
+%original file to the copy, Mercurial prevents this class of problem.
+%To my knowledge, Mercurial is the \emph{only} revision control system
+%that propagates changes across copies like this.
+
+$B%P%0$r=$@5$9$kJQ99$r<+F0E*$K%*%j%8%J%k%U%!%$%k$+$i%3%T!<$XGH5Z$5$;$k$3$H(B
+$B$K$h$C$F!$(BMercurial$B$O$3$NN`$NLdBj$rHr$1$F$$$k!%;d$NCN$k8B(B
+$B$j!$(BMercurial$B$O!$$3$N$h$&$J%3%T!<4V$GJQ99$rGH5Z$5$;$kM#0l$N%j%S%8%g%s%3%s(B
+$B%H%m!<%k%7%9%F%`$G$"$k!%(B
 
-Once your change history has a record that the copy and subsequent
-merge occurred, there's usually no further need to propagate changes
-from the original file to the copied file, and that's why Mercurial
-only propagates changes across copies until this point, and no
-further.
+%Once your change history has a record that the copy and subsequent
+%merge occurred, there's usually no further need to propagate changes
+%from the original file to the copied file, and that's why Mercurial
+%only propagates changes across copies until this point, and no
+%further.
+
+$B%3%T!<$H8eB3$N%^!<%8$,5/$3$C$?$3$H$,99?7MzNr$K4^$^$l$k>l9g!$JQ99$r%*%j%8(B
+$B%J%k%U%!%$%k$+$i%3%T!<$5$l$?%U%!%$%k$X$5$i$KGH5Z$5$;$kI,MW$O$J$$!%$3$l$,(B
+Mercurial$B$,$3$N;~E@$^$G$N$_JQ99$r%3%T!<4V$GGH5Z$5$;!$$=$N8e$G$O9T$o$J$$M}(B
+$BM3$G$"$k!%(B
 
 %\subsection{How to make changes \emph{not} follow a copy}
-\subsection{$BJQ99$,%3%T!<$K$7B&FbMF$K$9$kJ}K!(B}
+\subsection{$BJQ99$,%3%T!<$K=>$o$J$$$h$&$K$9$kJ}K!(B}
 
-If, for some reason, you decide that this business of automatically
-propagating changes across copies is not for you, simply use your
-system's normal file copy command (on Unix-like systems, that's
-\command{cp}) to make a copy of a file, then \hgcmd{add} the new copy
-by hand.  Before you do so, though, please do reread
-section~\ref{sec:daily:why-copy}, and make an informed decision that
-this behaviour is not appropriate to your specific case.
+%If, for some reason, you decide that this business of automatically
+%propagating changes across copies is not for you, simply use your
+%system's normal file copy command (on Unix-like systems, that's
+%\command{cp}) to make a copy of a file, then \hgcmd{add} the new copy
+%by hand.  Before you do so, though, please do reread
+%section~\ref{sec:daily:why-copy}, and make an informed decision that
+%this behaviour is not appropriate to your specific case.
+
+$B2?$i$+$NM}M3$G$3$N$h$&$KJQ99$,<+F0E*$KGH5Z$9$k$d$jJ}$,9%$^$7$/$J$$$H;W$o(B
+$B$l$k>l9g$O!$%7%9%F%`I8=`$N$"%U%!%$%k%3%T!<%3%^%s%I!J(BUNIX$B7O%7%9%F%`$G$O(B
+\command{cp}$B!K$r;H$C$F%U%!%$%k$N%3%T!<$r9T$$!$(B\hgcmd{add}$B$G?7$7$$%3%T!<$r(B
+$B<jF0$GDI2C$9$k$3$H$,$G$-$k!%$3$l$r<B:]$K9T$&A0(B
+$B$K!$(B~\ref{sec:daily:why-copy}$B@a$r:FFI$7!$$3$N$d$jJ}$N>\:Y$rF'$^$($?>e$G!$(B
+$B$"$J$?$N%1!<%9$KE,$7$F$$$k$+H=CG$7$F$[$7$$!%(B
 
 %\subsection{Behaviour of the \hgcmd{copy} command}
 \subsection{\hgcmd{copy}$B%3%^%s%I$N5sF0(B}
 
-When you use the \hgcmd{copy} command, Mercurial makes a copy of each
-source file as it currently stands in the working directory.  This
-means that if you make some modifications to a file, then \hgcmd{copy}
-it without first having committed those changes, the new copy will
-also contain the modifications you have made up until that point.  (I
-find this behaviour a little counterintuitive, which is why I mention
-it here.)
+%When you use the \hgcmd{copy} command, Mercurial makes a copy of each
+%source file as it currently stands in the working directory.  This
+%means that if you make some modifications to a file, then \hgcmd{copy}
+%it without first having committed those changes, the new copy will
+%also contain the modifications you have made up until that point.  (I
+%find this behaviour a little counterintuitive, which is why I mention
+%it here.)
+
+\hgcmd{copy}$B%3%^%s%I$r;H$&;~!$(BMercurial$B$O%o!<%-%s%0%G%#%l%/%H%jFb$N%U%!%$(B
+$B%k$r$=$N;~E@$N>uBV$G%3%T!<$9$k!%$9$J$o$A!$%U%!%$%k$K2?$i$+$NJQ99$r2C$(!$(B
+$BJQ99$N%3%_%C%H$r$;$:$K(B\hgcmd{copy}$B$r9T$&$H!$?7$?$J%3%T!<$b$=$N;~E@$^$G$K(B
+$B2C$($?JQ99$r4^$s$G$$$k!%(B $B!JI.<T$O$3$N5sF0$O$d$dD>4Q$KH?$9$k$H9M$($F$$$k$?(B
+$B$a!$4:$($F$3$3$G8@5Z$7$?!%!K(B
 
-The \hgcmd{copy} command acts similarly to the Unix \command{cp}
-command (you can use the \hgcmd{cp} alias if you prefer).  The last
-argument is the \emph{destination}, and all prior arguments are
-\emph{sources}.  If you pass it a single file as the source, and the
-destination does not exist, it creates a new file with that name.
+%The \hgcmd{copy} command acts similarly to the Unix \command{cp}
+%command (you can use the \hgcmd{cp} alias if you prefer).  The last
+%argument is the \emph{destination}, and all prior arguments are
+%\emph{sources}.  If you pass it a single file as the source, and the
+%destination does not exist, it creates a new file with that name.
+%\interaction{daily.copy.simple}
+%If the destination is a directory, Mercurial copies its sources into
+%that directory.
+%\interaction{daily.copy.dir-dest}
+%Copying a directory is recursive, and preserves the directory
+%structure of the source.
+%\interaction{daily.copy.dir-src}
+%If the source and destination are both directories, the source tree is
+%recreated in the destination directory.
+%\interaction{daily.copy.dir-src-dest}
+
+\hgcmd{copy}$B%3%^%s%I$O(BUnix$B$N(B\command{cp}$B$HF1MM$K?6Iq$&!%!J(B\hgcmd{cp}$B%(%$(B
+$B%j%"%9$rDj5A$7$F;H$&$3$H$b2DG=$@!%!K0z?t$N:G8e$O(B\emph{$B%3%T!<@h(B}$B$G!$$=$l0J(B
+$BA0$N0z?t$O(B\emph{$B%3%T!<85(B}$B$G$"$k!%%3%T!<85$H$7$FC10l$N%U%!%$%k$r;XDj$7!$%3(B
+$B%T!<@h%U%!%$%k$,B8:_$7$J$$>l9g!$%3%^%s%I$O%3%T!<@h%U%!%$%k$r?75,$K:n@.$9(B
+$B$k!%(B
 \interaction{daily.copy.simple}
-If the destination is a directory, Mercurial copies its sources into
-that directory.
+$B%3%T!<@h$,%G%#%l%/%H%j$N>l9g!$(BMercurial$B$O%3%T!<85$r%3%T!<@h%G%#%l%/%H%j(B
+$B$NCf$K%3%T!<$9$k!%(B
 \interaction{daily.copy.dir-dest}
-Copying a directory is recursive, and preserves the directory
-structure of the source.
+$B%G%#%l%/%H%j$N%3%T!<$O:F5"E*$G!$%3%T!<85$N%G%#%l%/%H%j9=B$$rJ]$D!%(B
 \interaction{daily.copy.dir-src}
-If the source and destination are both directories, the source tree is
-recreated in the destination directory.
+$B%3%T!<85$H%3%T!<@h$,6&$K%G%#%l%/%H%j$N>l9g!$%3%T!<85$N%D%j!<9=B$$,%3%T!<(B
+$B@h$N%G%#%l%/%H%j$NCf$K:F8=$5$l$k!%(B
 \interaction{daily.copy.dir-src-dest}
 
-As with the \hgcmd{rename} command, if you copy a file manually and
-then want Mercurial to know that you've copied the file, simply use
-the \hgopt{copy}{--after} option to \hgcmd{copy}.
+%As with the \hgcmd{rename} command, if you copy a file manually and
+%then want Mercurial to know that you've copied the file, simply use
+%the \hgopt{copy}{--after} option to \hgcmd{copy}.
+%\interaction{daily.copy.after}
+
+\hgcmd{rename}$B%3%^%s%I$HF1MM$K!$%U%!%$%k$r<jF0$G%3%T!<$7$?8e$G!$(BMercurial$B$K(B
+$BA`:n$rDLCN$7$?$$>l9g$O!$(B\hgcmd{copy}$B%3%^%s%I$K(B\hgopt{copy}{--after}$B%*%W(B
+$B%7%g%s$rIU$1$l$P$h$$!%(B
 \interaction{daily.copy.after}
 
 %\section{Renaming files}
 \section{$B%U%!%$%k$N%j%M!<%`(B}
 
-It's rather more common to need to rename a file than to make a copy
-of it.  The reason I discussed the \hgcmd{copy} command before talking
-about renaming files is that Mercurial treats a rename in essentially
-the same way as a copy.  Therefore, knowing what Mercurial does when
-you copy a file tells you what to expect when you rename a file.
+%It's rather more common to need to rename a file than to make a copy
+%of it.  The reason I discussed the \hgcmd{copy} command before talking
+%about renaming files is that Mercurial treats a rename in essentially
+%the same way as a copy.  Therefore, knowing what Mercurial does when
+%you copy a file tells you what to expect when you rename a file.
+
+$B%U%!%$%k$r%j%M!<%`$9$k$3$H$O%U%!%$%k$N%3%T!<$h$j$b$h$/9T$o$l$k!%%U%!%$%k(B
+$B$N%j%M!<%`$h$j$bA0$K(B\hgcmd{copy}$B$K$D$$$F=R$Y$?M}M3$O!$(B Mercurial$B$,K\<AE*(B
+$B$K%j%M!<%`$r%3%T!<$HF1MM$K07$&$+$i$G$"$k!%=>$C$F!$%U%!%$%k$r%3%T!<$9$k;~(B
+$B$K(BMercurial$B$,9T$&$3$H$rCN$k$3$H$O!$%j%M!<%`$N:]$K5/$3$k$3$H$rCN$k$3$H$K$J(B
+$B$k!%(B
 
-When you use the \hgcmd{rename} command, Mercurial makes a copy of
-each source file, then deletes it and marks the file as removed.
+%When you use the \hgcmd{rename} command, Mercurial makes a copy of
+%each source file, then deletes it and marks the file as removed.
+%\interaction{daily.rename.rename}
+%The \hgcmd{status} command shows the newly copied file as added, and
+%the copied-from file as removed.
+%\interaction{daily.rename.status}
+
+\hgcmd{rename}$B%3%^%s%I$r;H$&;~!$(BMercurial$B$O3F!9$N%=!<%9%U%!%$%k$r%3%T!<(B
+$B$7!$85$N%U%!%$%k$r:o=|$7$F!$>C5n:Q$_$H%^!<%/$9$k!%(B
 \interaction{daily.rename.rename}
-The \hgcmd{status} command shows the newly copied file as added, and
-the copied-from file as removed.
+\hgcmd{status}$B%3%^%s%I$O?7$?$K%3%T!<$5$l$?%U%!%$%k$rDI2C$5$l$?%U%!%$%k$H(B
+$B$7$FI=<($7!$%3%T!<$5$l$?%U%!%$%k$r>C5n$5$l$?%U%!%$%k$HI=<($9$k!%(B
 \interaction{daily.rename.status}
-As with the results of a \hgcmd{copy}, we must use the
-\hgopt{status}{-C} option to \hgcmd{status} to see that the added file
-is really being tracked by Mercurial as a copy of the original, now
-removed, file.
+
+%As with the results of a \hgcmd{copy}, we must use the
+%\hgopt{status}{-C} option to \hgcmd{status} to see that the added file
+%is really being tracked by Mercurial as a copy of the original, now
+%removed, file.
+%\interaction{daily.rename.status-copy}
+
+\hgcmd{copy}$B%3%^%s%I$N>l9g$HF1MM$K!$(B \hgcmd{status}$B%3%^%s%I$K(B
+\hgopt{status}{-C}$B%*%W%7%g%s$rMQ$$$F!$DI2C$5$l$?%U%!%$%k$,>C5n$5$l$?%*%j(B
+$B%8%J%k%U%!%$%k$N%3%T!<$H$7$F(BMercurial$B$KDI@W$5$l$F$$$k$N$+$rD4$Y$k$3$H$,$G(B
+$B$-$k!%(B
 \interaction{daily.rename.status-copy}
 
-As with \hgcmd{remove} and \hgcmd{copy}, you can tell Mercurial about
-a rename after the fact using the \hgopt{rename}{--after} option.  In
-most other respects, the behaviour of the \hgcmd{rename} command, and
-the options it accepts, are similar to the \hgcmd{copy} command.
+%As with \hgcmd{remove} and \hgcmd{copy}, you can tell Mercurial about
+%a rename after the fact using the \hgopt{rename}{--after} option.  In
+%most other respects, the behaviour of the \hgcmd{rename} command, and
+%the options it accepts, are similar to the \hgcmd{copy} command.
+
+\hgcmd{remove}$B$H(B\hgcmd{copy}$B$N$h$&$K!$(B\hgopt{rename}{--after}$B%*%W%7%g%s$r(B
+$B;H$&$3$H$G!$;v8e$K%j%M!<%`$r$9$k$3$H$,$G$-$k!%B?$/$NE@$G(B\hgcmd{rename}$B%3(B
+$B%^%s%I$N5sF0$H!$$3$N%3%^%s%I$,<u$1F~$l$k%*%W%7%g%s$O(B\hgcmd{copy}$B%3%^%s%I(B
+$B$HN`;w$7$F$$$k!%(B
 
 %\subsection{Renaming files and merging changes}
 \subsection{$B%U%!%$%k$N%j%M!<%`$HJQ99$N%^!<%8(B}
--- a/ja/todo.txt	Thu Jan 15 16:34:43 2009 +0900
+++ b/ja/todo.txt	Thu Feb 19 14:37:50 2009 +0900
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 branch.tex	100%
 collab.tex	100%
 concepts.tex
-daily.tex	5%
+daily.tex	100%
 filenames.tex	100%
 hg_id.tex	noneed
 hgext.tex	100%