Mercurial > hgbook
changeset 66:81a2f7a639ed
Fix typos
| author | Guy Brand <gb@isis.u-strasbg.fr> |
|---|---|
| date | Mon, 07 Aug 2006 05:20:07 -0700 |
| parents | e3894bb9d1f5 |
| children | a2f0b010d6e3 |
| files | en/mq.tex |
| diffstat | 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/en/mq.tex Fri Aug 04 14:00:22 2006 -0700 +++ b/en/mq.tex Mon Aug 07 05:20:07 2006 -0700 @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ I cannot overstate the value that MQ offers through the unification of patches and revision control. -A major reaon that patches have persisted in the free software and +A major reason that patches have persisted in the free software and open source world---in spite of the availability of increasingly capable revision control tools over the years---is the \emph{agility} they offer. @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ line.'' For example, a line that is modified is represented by one deletion and one insertion. -We will return to ome of the more subtle aspects of patches later (in +We will return to some of the more subtle aspects of patches later (in section~\ref{sec:mq:adv-patch}), but you should have enough information now to use MQ. @@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ some performance experiments in mid-2006 for a talk that I gave at the 2006 EuroPython conference~\cite{web:europython}. I used as my data set the Linux 2.6.17-mm1 patch series, which consists of 1,738 -patches. I applied thes on top of a Linux kernel repository +patches. I applied these on top of a Linux kernel repository containing all 27,472 revisions between Linux 2.6.12-rc2 and Linux 2.6.17.