changeset 307:bb4c3994cec7

more undo.tex
author Yoshiki Yazawa <yaz@cc.rim.or.jp>
date Tue, 12 Feb 2008 06:09:08 +0900
parents 62ea8107a73b
children dd775100013d
files ja/undo.tex
diffstat 1 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-) [+]
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/ja/undo.tex	Tue Feb 12 02:39:14 2008 +0900
+++ b/ja/undo.tex	Tue Feb 12 06:09:08 2008 +0900
@@ -739,75 +739,132 @@
 
 
 %\section{Changes that should never have been}
-\section{$B$9$Y$-$G$J$$JQ99(B}
+\section{$BB8:_$9$Y$-$G$J$$JQ99(B}
 \label{sec:undo:aaaiiieee}
 
-Most of the time, the \hgcmd{backout} command is exactly what you need
-if you want to undo the effects of a change.  It leaves a permanent
-record of exactly what you did, both when committing the original
-changeset and when you cleaned up after it.
+%Most of the time, the \hgcmd{backout} command is exactly what you need
+%if you want to undo the effects of a change.  It leaves a permanent
+%record of exactly what you did, both when committing the original
+%changeset and when you cleaned up after it.
+
+$BBgDq$N>l9g!$(B\hgcmd{backout}$B$O$"$kJQ99$r<h$j>C$=$&$H$9$k:]$K;W$C$?$h$&$K5!(B
+$BG=$9$k$O$:$G$"$k!%85!9$N%3%_%C%H$d$=$l$r<h$j=|$$$?;~$K2?$r$7$?$N$+1JB3E*(B
+$B$J5-21$,;D$5$l$k!%(B
 
-On rare occasions, though, you may find that you've committed a change
-that really should not be present in the repository at all.  For
-example, it would be very unusual, and usually considered a mistake,
-to commit a software project's object files as well as its source
-files.  Object files have almost no intrinsic value, and they're
-\emph{big}, so they increase the size of the repository and the amount
-of time it takes to clone or pull changes.
+%On rare occasions, though, you may find that you've committed a change
+%that really should not be present in the repository at all.  For
+%example, it would be very unusual, and usually considered a mistake,
+%to commit a software project's object files as well as its source
+%files.Object files have almost no intrinsic value, and they're
+%\emph{big}, so they increase the size of the repository and the amount
+%of time it takes to clone or pull changes.
+
+$B$=$l$G$b$?$^$K%j%]%8%H%j$KA4$/;D$7$?$/$J$$JQ99$r%3%_%C%H$7$F$7$^$&$3$H$,(B
+$B$"$k!%$?$H$($P!$Hs>o$KJQ$J%3%_%C%H$d!$DL>o%_%9$H9M$($i$l$k$h$&$J%3%_%C%H!$(B
+$B%=!<%9$@$1$G$O$J$/%W%m%8%'%/%H$N%*%V%8%'%/%H%U%!%$%k$b%3%_%C%H$7$F$7$^$&(B
+$B$J$I$,M-$jF@$k!%%*%V%8%'%/%H%U%!%$%k$O8GM-$NCM$r;}$AF@$:!$$+$D(B\emph{$BBg$-(B
+$B$$(B}$B!%$=$N$?$a!$%j%]%8%H%j$N%5%$%:$rA}$d$7!$%/%m!<%s$d%W%k$KM>7W$J;~4V$,3](B
+$B$+$k$h$&$K$J$k!%(B
+
+%Before I discuss the options that you have if you commit a ``brown
+%paper bag'' change (the kind that's so bad that you want to pull a
+%brown paper bag over your head), let me first discuss some approaches
+%that probably won't work.
 
-Before I discuss the options that you have if you commit a ``brown
-paper bag'' change (the kind that's so bad that you want to pull a
-brown paper bag over your head), let me first discuss some approaches
-that probably won't work.
+$BCc?'$N;fB^%3%_%C%H!JCc?'$N;fB^$rF,$KHo$j$?$$$0$i$$%P%D$N0-$$%3%_%C%H!K$K(B
+$B;H$($k%*%W%7%g%s$K$D$$$F5DO@$9$kA0$K!$$$$/$D$+$N$&$^$/9T$+$J$$%"%W%m!<%A(B
+$B$r=R$Y$?$$!%(B
+
+%Since Mercurial treats history as accumulative---every change builds
+%on top of all changes that preceded it---you generally can't just make
+%disastrous changes disappear.  The one exception is when you've just
+%committed a change, and it hasn't been pushed or pulled into another
+%repository.  That's when you can safely use the \hgcmd{rollback}
+%command, as I detailed in section~\ref{sec:undo:rollback}.
 
-Since Mercurial treats history as accumulative---every change builds
-on top of all changes that preceded it---you generally can't just make
-disastrous changes disappear.  The one exception is when you've just
-committed a change, and it hasn't been pushed or pulled into another
-repository.  That's when you can safely use the \hgcmd{rollback}
-command, as I detailed in section~\ref{sec:undo:rollback}.
+Mercurial$B$OMzNr$rN_@QE*$J$b$N$H$7$F07$&!%A4$F$NJQ99$O$=$l$K@hN)$DA4$F$NJQ(B
+$B99$N>e$K$J$j$?$C$F$$$k!%0lHLE*$K8@$C$FGK2uE*$JJQ99$r2sHr$9$k$3$H$O$G$-$J(B
+$B$$!%$?$C$?0l$D$NNc30$O%3%_%C%H$r9T$J$C$?D>8e$G!$B>$N%j%]%8%H%j$K%W%C%7%e(B
+$B$b%W%k$b$5$l$F$$$J$$>l9g$G$"$k!%$=$N>l9g!$(B\ref{sec:undo:rollback}$B$N%;%/%7%g(B
+$B%s$G>\$7$/?($l$?$h$&$K!$0BA4$K(B\hgcmd{rollback}$B$r<B9T$9$k$3$H$,$G$-$k!%(B
 
-After you've pushed a bad change to another repository, you
-\emph{could} still use \hgcmd{rollback} to make your local copy of the
-change disappear, but it won't have the consequences you want.  The
-change will still be present in the remote repository, so it will
-reappear in your local repository the next time you pull.
+%After you've pushed a bad change to another repository, you \emph{could}
+%still use \hgcmd{rollback} to make your local copy of the change
+%disappear, but it won't have the consequences you want.  The change will
+%still be present in the remote repository, so it will reappear in your
+%local repository the next time you pull.
+
+$B4V0c$C$?JQ99$rB>$N%j%]%8%H%j$K%W%C%7%e$7$?8e$G$b%m!<%+(B
+$B%k%3%T!<$NJQ99$r<h$j>C$9$?$a$K0MA3$H$7$F(B\hgcmd{rollback}$B$r;H$&$3$H$,(B
+\emph{$B$G$-$k(B}$B$,!$$3$l$O0U?^$7$?$h$&$J7k2L$K$O$J$i$J$$!%JQ99$O0MA3$H$7$F(B
+$B%j%b!<%H$N%j%]%8%H%j$K$O$=$s$6$$$7$F$*$j!$<!$K%W%k$7$?;~$K$O%m!<%+%k%j%](B
+$B%8%H%j$K$b8=$l$k!%(B
 
-If a situation like this arises, and you know which repositories your
-bad change has propagated into, you can \emph{try} to get rid of the
-changeefrom \emph{every} one of those repositories.  This is, of
-course, not a satisfactory solution: if you miss even a single
-repository while you're expunging, the change is still ``in the
-wild'', and could propagate further.
+%If a situation like this arises, and you know which repositories your
+%bad change has propagated into, you can \emph{try} to get rid of the
+%changee from \emph{every} one of those repositories.  This is, of
+%course, not a satisfactory solution: if you miss even a single
+%repository while you're expunging, the change is still ``in the
+%wild'', and could propagate further.
+
+$B$3$N$h$&$J>u67$K$J$C$?;~!$$b$7$I$N%j%]%8%H%j$K$3$N4V0c$C$?JQ99$,GH5Z$7$F(B
+$B$$$k$N$+$,L@$i$+$G$"$l$P!$$=$l$i$N%j%]%8%H%j$N0l$D0l$D$+$i!$JQ99$r<h$j=|(B
+$B$/$3$H$r;n$_$k$3$H$,$G$-$k!%$3$l$O$b$A$m$sK~B-$N$$$/2r7hK!$G$O$J$$!%$b$7(B
+$B0l$D$G$b>C5n$rK:$l$l$P!$JQ99$OLnJ|$7$K$J$C$F$*$j!$$5$i$K3H$,$jF@$k!%(B
 
-If you've committed one or more changes \emph{after} the change that
-you'd like to see disappear, your options are further reduced.
-Mercurial doesn't provide a way to ``punch a hole'' in history,
-leaving changesets intact.
+%If you've committed one or more changes \emph{after} the change that
+%you'd like to see disappear, your options are further reduced.
+%Mercurial doesn't provide a way to ``punch a hole'' in history,
+%leaving changesets intact.
+
+$B$b$7(B1$B$D0J>e$N?7$?$JJQ99$r!$>C$7$?$$$H;W$C$F$$$kJQ99$N8e$K%3%_%C%H$7$F$$(B
+$B$?$H$9$l$P!$;H$($k%*%W%7%g%s$O$5$i$K>/$J$/$J$k!%(BMercurial$B$O%A%'%s%8%;%C(B
+$B%H$r$=$N$^$^$KMzNr$K7j$r3+$1$k$h$&$JJ}K!$rDs6!$7$F$$$J$$!%(B
 
-XXX This needs filling out.  The \texttt{hg-replay} script in the
-\texttt{examples} directory works, but doesn't handle merge
-changesets.  Kind of an important omission.
+%XXX This needs filling out.  The \texttt{hg-replay} script in the
+%\texttt{examples} directory works, but doesn't handle merge
+%changesets.  Kind of an important omission.
 
-\subsection{Protect yourself from ``escaped'' changes}
+XXX $BDI5-$NI,MW@-$"$j!%(B\texttt{examples}$B%G%#%l%/%H%jFb$N(B
+\texttt{hg-replay}$B%9%/%j%W%H$O5!G=$9$k$,!$%A%'%s%8%;%C%H$N%^!<%8$r07$o$J(B
+$B$$!%=EMW$J@)8B$G$"$k!%(B
+
+
+%\subsection{Protect yourself from ``escaped'' changes}
+\subsection{$B0oC&$7$?JQ99$+$i<+J,<+?H$r<i$k(B}
 
-If you've committed some changes to your local repository and they've
-been pushed or pulled somewhere else, this isn't necessarily a
-disaster.  You can protect yourself ahead of time against some classes
-of bad changeset.  This is particularly easy if your team usually
-pulls changes from a central repository.
+%If you've committed some changes to your local repository and they've
+%been pushed or pulled somewhere else, this isn't necessarily a
+%disaster.  You can protect yourself ahead of time against some classes
+%of bad changeset.  This is particularly easy if your team usually
+%pulls changes from a central repository.
+
+$B%m!<%+%k%j%]%8%H%j$K$$$/$D$+$NJQ99$r%3%_%C%H$7!$$=$l$i$,JL$N=j$K%W%C%7%e(B
+$B$^$?$O%W%k$5$l$F$$$F!$I,$:$7$bBg:R32$H$O8@$($J$$!%$"$J$?$O$$$/$D$+$N%/%i(B
+$B%9$N4V0c$C$?JQ99$+$i<+J,<+?H$G$_$r<i$k$3$H$,$G$-$k!%$3$l$O$"$J$?$N%A!<%`(B
+$B$,Cf1{$N%j%]%8%H%j$+$iJQ99$r%W%k$7$F$$$k>l9g$OFC$K4JC1$G$"$k!%(B
 
-By configuring some hooks on that repository to validate incoming
-changesets (see chapter~\ref{chap:hook}), you can automatically
-prevent some kinds of bad changeset from being pushed to the central
-repository at all.  With such a configuration in place, some kinds of
-bad changeset will naturally tend to ``die out'' because they can't
-propagate into the central repository.  Better yet, this happens
-without any need for explicit intervention.
+%By configuring some hooks on that repository to validate incoming
+%changesets (see chapter~\ref{chap:hook}), you can automatically
+%prevent some kinds of bad changeset from being pushed to the central
+%repository at all.  With such a configuration in place, some kinds of
+%bad changeset will naturally tend to ``die out'' because they can't
+%propagate into the central repository.
+%Better yet, this happens without any need for explicit intervention.
 
-For instance, an incoming change hook that verifies that a changeset
-will actually compile can prevent people from inadvertantly ``breaking
-the build''.
+$BCf1{%j%]%8%H%j$N>e$G!$JQ99E~Ce$K%U%C%/$r@_Dj$9$k!J(B\ref{chap:hook}$B$r;2>H!K(B
+$B$3$H$G!$$"$k<o$N8m$C$?%A%'%s%8%;%C%H$,Cf1{%j%]%8%H%j$K%3%_%C%H$5$l$k$N$r(B
+$B<+F0E*$KKI$0$3$H$,$G$-$k!%(B
+$B$=$N$h$&$J@_Dj$r9T$&$3$H$G!$$"$k<o$N8m$C$?%A%'%s%8%;%C%H$O%;%s%H%i%k%j%](B
+$B%8%H%j$KGH5Z$9$k$3$H$,$G$-$:!$;`LG$7$F$$$/798~$,$"$k!%$5$i$KNI$$$3$H$H$7(B
+$B$F$O!$$3$l$OL@<(E*$K2pF~$;$:$KH/@8$5$;$k$3$H$,$G$-$k$3$H$,$"$k!%(B
+
+%For instance, an incoming change hook that verifies that a changeset
+%will actually compile can prevent people from inadvertantly ``breaking
+%the build''.
+
+$BNc$($P!$%A%'%s%8%;%C%H$r<B:]$K%3%s%Q%$%k$9$kJQ99E~Ce%U%C%/$O!$ITCm0U$K$h(B
+$B$k%S%k%IITG=$rKI$0$3$H$,$G$-$k!%(B
 
 \section{Finding the source of a bug}
 \label{sec:undo:bisect}