comparison h264.c @ 6903:0f63fc62ea8b libavcodec

consistency cosmetics: indices --> indexes
author diego
date Mon, 26 May 2008 23:14:25 +0000
parents 5ddf098691d3
children c1b722b79649
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
6902:b6e110c575ff 6903:0f63fc62ea8b
6503 const int mvy_limit = IS_INTERLACED(mb_type) ? 2 : 4; 6503 const int mvy_limit = IS_INTERLACED(mb_type) ? 2 : 4;
6504 int first_vertical_edge_done = 0; 6504 int first_vertical_edge_done = 0;
6505 int dir; 6505 int dir;
6506 /* FIXME: A given frame may occupy more than one position in 6506 /* FIXME: A given frame may occupy more than one position in
6507 * the reference list. So ref2frm should be populated with 6507 * the reference list. So ref2frm should be populated with
6508 * frame numbers, not indices. */ 6508 * frame numbers, not indexes. */
6509 static const int ref2frm[34] = {-1,-1,0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15, 6509 static const int ref2frm[34] = {-1,-1,0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,
6510 16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31}; 6510 16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31};
6511 6511
6512 //for sufficiently low qp, filtering wouldn't do anything 6512 //for sufficiently low qp, filtering wouldn't do anything
6513 //this is a conservative estimate: could also check beta_offset and more accurate chroma_qp 6513 //this is a conservative estimate: could also check beta_offset and more accurate chroma_qp