# HG changeset patch # User vitor # Date 1212682544 0 # Node ID 6e374f47da64f464e96e1acc7226349e51216890 # Parent 5bad976fae7b08f15bace71d4be01e9ec91d8066 Remove *lpc_refl from the context. Only the value calculated in rms() is actually needed. It also avoid recalculating it later. diff -r 5bad976fae7b -r 6e374f47da64 ra144.c --- a/ra144.c Thu Jun 05 16:11:51 2008 +0000 +++ b/ra144.c Thu Jun 05 16:15:44 2008 +0000 @@ -34,11 +34,11 @@ unsigned int old_energy; ///< previous frame energy /* the swapped buffers */ - unsigned int lpc_tables[4][10]; - unsigned int *lpc_refl; ///< LPC reflection coefficients + unsigned int lpc_tables[2][10]; unsigned int *lpc_coef; ///< LPC coefficients - unsigned int *lpc_refl_old; ///< previous frame LPC reflection coefs unsigned int *lpc_coef_old; ///< previous frame LPC coefficients + unsigned int lpc_refl_rms; + unsigned int lpc_refl_rms_old; unsigned int buffer[5]; uint16_t adapt_cb[148]; ///< adaptive codebook @@ -48,10 +48,8 @@ { RA144Context *ractx = avctx->priv_data; - ractx->lpc_refl = ractx->lpc_tables[0]; - ractx->lpc_coef = ractx->lpc_tables[1]; - ractx->lpc_refl_old = ractx->lpc_tables[2]; - ractx->lpc_coef_old = ractx->lpc_tables[3]; + ractx->lpc_coef = ractx->lpc_tables[0]; + ractx->lpc_coef_old = ractx->lpc_tables[1]; return 0; } @@ -318,10 +316,10 @@ // coefficients if (copynew) { int_to_int16(decsp, ractx->lpc_coef); - return rescale_rms(rms(ractx->lpc_refl), energy); + return rescale_rms(ractx->lpc_refl_rms, energy); } else { int_to_int16(decsp, ractx->lpc_coef_old); - return rescale_rms(rms(ractx->lpc_refl_old), energy); + return rescale_rms(ractx->lpc_refl_rms_old, energy); } } else { return rescale_rms(rms(work), energy); @@ -336,6 +334,7 @@ static const uint8_t sizes[10] = {6, 5, 5, 4, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2}; unsigned int refl_rms[4]; // RMS of the reflection coefficients uint16_t block_coefs[4][30]; // LPC coefficients of each sub-block + unsigned int lpc_refl[10]; // LPC reflection coefficients of the frame int i, c; int16_t *data = vdata; unsigned int energy; @@ -352,9 +351,10 @@ for (i=0; i<10; i++) // "<< 1"? Doesn't this make one value out of two of the table useless? - ractx->lpc_refl[i] = decodetable[i][get_bits(&gb, sizes[i]) << 1]; + lpc_refl[i] = decodetable[i][get_bits(&gb, sizes[i]) << 1]; - eval_coefs(ractx->lpc_refl, ractx->lpc_coef); + eval_coefs(lpc_refl, ractx->lpc_coef); + ractx->lpc_refl_rms = rms(lpc_refl); energy = decodeval[get_bits(&gb, 5) << 1]; // Useless table entries? @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ refl_rms[1] = interp(ractx, block_coefs[1], 1, energy > ractx->old_energy, t_sqrt(energy*ractx->old_energy) >> 12); refl_rms[2] = interp(ractx, block_coefs[2], 2, 1, energy); - refl_rms[3] = rescale_rms(rms(ractx->lpc_refl), energy); + refl_rms[3] = rescale_rms(ractx->lpc_refl_rms, energy); int_to_int16(block_coefs[3], ractx->lpc_coef); @@ -377,8 +377,8 @@ } ractx->old_energy = energy; + ractx->lpc_refl_rms_old = ractx->lpc_refl_rms; - FFSWAP(unsigned int *, ractx->lpc_refl_old, ractx->lpc_refl); FFSWAP(unsigned int *, ractx->lpc_coef_old, ractx->lpc_coef); *data_size = 2*160;