# HG changeset patch # User vitor # Date 1214254828 0 # Node ID c98b43981d894e05017afe2652a4189ac72c669c # Parent 39be110f531d7f65ccfd39723374a99a53f898f1 Consistency: make the output buffer the first argument of functions diff -r 39be110f531d -r c98b43981d89 ra144.c --- a/ra144.c Mon Jun 23 20:53:05 2008 +0000 +++ b/ra144.c Mon Jun 23 21:00:28 2008 +0000 @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ * Evaluate the LPC filter coefficients from the reflection coefficients. * Does the inverse of the eval_refl() function. */ -static void eval_coefs(const int *refl, int *coefs) +static void eval_coefs(int *coefs, const int *refl) { int buffer[10]; int *b1 = buffer; @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ * Copy the last offset values of *source to *target. If those values are not * enough to fill the target buffer, fill it with another copy of those values. */ -static void copy_and_dup(const int16_t *source, int16_t *target, int offset) +static void copy_and_dup(int16_t *target, const int16_t *source, int offset) { source += BUFFERSIZE - offset; @@ -124,8 +124,8 @@ return 0x20000000 / (t_sqrt(sum) >> 8); } -static void add_wav(int n, int skip_first, int *m, const int16_t *s1, - const int8_t *s2, const int8_t *s3, int16_t *dest) +static void add_wav(int16_t *dest, int n, int skip_first, int *m, + const int16_t *s1, const int8_t *s2, const int8_t *s3) { int i; int v[3]; @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ * @param in the input of the filter. It should be an array of size len + 10. * The 10 first input values are used to evaluate the first filtered one. */ -static void lpc_filter(const int16_t *lpc_coefs, uint16_t *in, int len) +static void lpc_filter(uint16_t *in, const int16_t *lpc_coefs, int len) { int x, i; int16_t *ptr = in; @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ if (cba_idx) { cba_idx += BLOCKSIZE/2 - 1; - copy_and_dup(ractx->adapt_cb, buffer_a, cba_idx); + copy_and_dup(buffer_a, ractx->adapt_cb, cba_idx); m[0] = (irms(buffer_a) * gval) >> 12; } else { m[0] = 0; @@ -228,15 +228,15 @@ block = ractx->adapt_cb + BUFFERSIZE - BLOCKSIZE; - add_wav(gain, cba_idx, m, buffer_a, cb1_vects[cb1_idx], cb2_vects[cb2_idx], - block); + add_wav(block, gain, cba_idx, m, buffer_a, + cb1_vects[cb1_idx], cb2_vects[cb2_idx]); memcpy(ractx->curr_sblock, ractx->curr_sblock + 40, 10*sizeof(*ractx->curr_sblock)); memcpy(ractx->curr_sblock + 10, block, BLOCKSIZE*sizeof(*ractx->curr_sblock)); - lpc_filter(lpc_coefs, ractx->curr_sblock, BLOCKSIZE); + lpc_filter(ractx->curr_sblock, lpc_coefs, BLOCKSIZE); } static void int_to_int16(int16_t *out, const int *inp) @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ * @return 1 if one of the reflection coefficients is of magnitude greater than * 4095, 0 if not. */ -static int eval_refl(const int16_t *coefs, int *refl, RA144Context *ractx) +static int eval_refl(int *refl, const int16_t *coefs, RA144Context *ractx) { int retval = 0; int b, c, i; @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ for (x=0; x<30; x++) out[x] = (a * ractx->lpc_coef[x] + b * ractx->lpc_coef_old[x])>> 2; - if (eval_refl(out, work, ractx)) { + if (eval_refl(work, out, ractx)) { // The interpolated coefficients are unstable, copy either new or old // coefficients if (copynew) { @@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ // "<< 1"? Doesn't this make one value out of two of the table useless? lpc_refl[i] = lpc_refl_cb[i][get_bits(&gb, sizes[i]) << 1]; - eval_coefs(lpc_refl, ractx->lpc_coef); + eval_coefs(ractx->lpc_coef, lpc_refl); ractx->lpc_refl_rms = rms(lpc_refl); energy = energy_tab[get_bits(&gb, 5) << 1]; // Useless table entries?