comparison DOCS/xml/en/encoding-guide.xml @ 16202:24c28ac0aa68

Why multipass is better in a nutshell. Taken from Rich's encoding guide.
author gpoirier
date Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:27:26 +0000
parents 28f3faf22115
children 5506042289b2
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
16201:ca701176fe03 16202:24c28ac0aa68
285 </para> 285 </para>
286 286
287 <para> 287 <para>
288 There are three approaches to encoding the video: constant bitrate 288 There are three approaches to encoding the video: constant bitrate
289 (CBR), constant quantizer, and multipass (ABR, or average bitrate). 289 (CBR), constant quantizer, and multipass (ABR, or average bitrate).
290 </para>
291
292 <para>
293 The complexity (and thus the number of bits) required to compress the
294 frames of a movie can vary greatly from one scene to another.
295 Modern video encoders can adjust to these needs as they go and vary
296 the bitrate.
297 However, in simple modes such CBR, they cannot exceed the requested
298 average bitrate for long stretches of time, because they do not know
299 the bitrate needs of future scenes.
300 Wiser modes, such as multipass encode can take into account the
301 statistics from previous passes, which fixes the problem mentioned
302 above.
290 </para> 303 </para>
291 304
292 <note><title>Note:</title> 305 <note><title>Note:</title>
293 <para> 306 <para>
294 Most codecs which support ABR encode only support two pass encode 307 Most codecs which support ABR encode only support two pass encode