comparison DOCS/tech/encoding-tips.txt @ 11271:252fb0cf331a

spelling fixes, mostly by <ismail.donmez@boun.edu.tr>
author diego
date Sun, 26 Oct 2003 14:58:17 +0000
parents b5bea79929c6
children dffc970f1922
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
11270:8ba8ec1293e7 11271:252fb0cf331a
218 218
219 (width and height are from destination video size, and bitrate is in 219 (width and height are from destination video size, and bitrate is in
220 bits (i.e. 900kbps is 900000)) 220 bits (i.e. 900kbps is 900000))
221 221
222 This way it apeared that the minimum bits per block is ~40, very 222 This way it apeared that the minimum bits per block is ~40, very
223 good results are with ~50, and everything above 60 is a waste of bandwith. 223 good results are with ~50, and everything above 60 is a waste of bandwidth.
224 And what's actually funny is that it was independant of codec used. The 224 And what's actually funny is that it was independant of codec used. The
225 results were exactly the same, whether I used DIV3 (with tricky nandub's 225 results were exactly the same, whether I used DIV3 (with tricky nandub's
226 magick), ffmpeg odivx, DivX5 on Windows or XviD. 226 magick), ffmpeg odivx, DivX5 on Windows or XviD.
227 227
228 Surprisingly there is one advantage of using nandub-DIV3 for bitrate 228 Surprisingly there is one advantage of using nandub-DIV3 for bitrate