comparison DOCS/xml/en/encoding-guide.xml @ 20037:50113e22db17

Fix hz vs Hz typo.

20036:b7e7b21ebfaa

  made to increase quality and compression.
  Therefore, the authors of this guide and many other people suggest that
  you cannot go wrong
  <footnote id='fn-menc-feat-dvd-mpeg4-codec-cpu'>
  <para>Be careful, however: Decoding DVD-resolution MPEG-4 AVC videos
  requires a fast machine (i.e. a Pentium 4 over 1.5Ghz or a Pentium M
  over 1Ghz).
  </para></footnote>
  when choosing MPEG-4 AVC codecs like
  <systemitem class="library">x264</systemitem> instead of MPEG-4 ASP codecs
  such as <systemitem class="library">libavcodec</systemitem> MPEG-4 or
  <systemitem class="library">XviD</systemitem>.

</para>

<para>
  All the encoding settings were tested on a 720x448 @30000/1001 fps
  video sample, the target bitrate was 900kbps, and the machine was an
  AMD-64 3400+ at 2400 Mhz in 64 bits mode.
  Each encoding setting features the measured encoding speed (in
  frames per second) and the PSNR loss (in dB) compared to the "very
  high quality" setting.
  Please understand that depending on your source, your machine type
  and development advancements, you may get very different results.

</para>

<para>
  All the encoding settings were tested on a 720x448 @30000/1001 fps
  video sample, the target bitrate was 900kbps, and the machine was an
  AMD-64 3400+ at 2400 Mhz in 64 bits mode.
  Each encoding setting features the measured encoding speed (in
  frames per second) and the PSNR loss (in dB) compared to the "very
  high quality" setting.
  Please understand that depending on your source, your machine type
  and development advancements, you may get very different results.

</para>

<para>
  All the encoding settings were tested on a 720x448 @30000/1001 fps
  video sample, the target bitrate was 900kbps, and the machine was an
  AMD-64 3400+ at 2400 Mhz in 64 bits mode.
  Each encoding setting features the measured encoding speed (in
  frames per second) and the PSNR loss (in dB) compared to the "very
  high quality" setting.
  Please understand that depending on your source, your machine type
  and development advancements, you may get very different results.

20037:50113e22db17

  made to increase quality and compression.
  Therefore, the authors of this guide and many other people suggest that
  you cannot go wrong
  <footnote id='fn-menc-feat-dvd-mpeg4-codec-cpu'>
  <para>Be careful, however: Decoding DVD-resolution MPEG-4 AVC videos
  requires a fast machine (i.e. a Pentium 4 over 1.5GHz or a Pentium M
  over 1GHz).
  </para></footnote>
  when choosing MPEG-4 AVC codecs like
  <systemitem class="library">x264</systemitem> instead of MPEG-4 ASP codecs
  such as <systemitem class="library">libavcodec</systemitem> MPEG-4 or
  <systemitem class="library">XviD</systemitem>.

</para>

<para>
  All the encoding settings were tested on a 720x448 @30000/1001 fps
  video sample, the target bitrate was 900kbps, and the machine was an
  AMD-64 3400+ at 2400 MHz in 64 bits mode.
  Each encoding setting features the measured encoding speed (in
  frames per second) and the PSNR loss (in dB) compared to the "very
  high quality" setting.
  Please understand that depending on your source, your machine type
  and development advancements, you may get very different results.

</para>

<para>
  All the encoding settings were tested on a 720x448 @30000/1001 fps
  video sample, the target bitrate was 900kbps, and the machine was an
  AMD-64 3400+ at 2400 MHz in 64 bits mode.
  Each encoding setting features the measured encoding speed (in
  frames per second) and the PSNR loss (in dB) compared to the "very
  high quality" setting.
  Please understand that depending on your source, your machine type
  and development advancements, you may get very different results.

</para>

<para>
  All the encoding settings were tested on a 720x448 @30000/1001 fps
  video sample, the target bitrate was 900kbps, and the machine was an
  AMD-64 3400+ at 2400 MHz in 64 bits mode.
  Each encoding setting features the measured encoding speed (in
  frames per second) and the PSNR loss (in dB) compared to the "very
  high quality" setting.
  Please understand that depending on your source, your machine type
  and development advancements, you may get very different results.