Mercurial > mplayer.hg
diff DOCS/faq.html @ 6055:3ca1f8cf7bfc
various updates by Diego Biurrun <diego@biurrun.de>
author | arpi |
---|---|
date | Sun, 12 May 2002 01:41:24 +0000 |
parents | 6cc15e96d709 |
children | 4472bc36675b |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/DOCS/faq.html Sun May 12 01:09:10 2002 +0000 +++ b/DOCS/faq.html Sun May 12 01:41:24 2002 +0000 @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ What's the problem with gcc 2.96? </B></TD><TR><TD></TD><TD VALIGN=top><FONT CLASS="text">A:</TD><TD><FONT CLASS="text"> <B><I>We strongly discourage the use of gcc 2.96!!!</I></B><BR> -Read <A HREF="gcc-2.96-3.0.html">this</A> and <A HREF="users_against_developers.html">this</A> +Read <A HREF="users_against_developers.html#gcc">this</A> document for details. If you still really really want to use it, be sure to get the latest release, but remember that you are on your own. Do <B>not</B> report bugs or ask for help on the mailing lists. We will <B>not</B> provide any support @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ Great, I have gcc 3.0.1 from Red Hat/Mandrake, then I'm fine--! </B></TD><TR><TD></TD><TD VALIGN=top><FONT CLASS="text">A:</TD><TD><FONT CLASS="text"> No, since there have been/are issues with these compilers as well.<BR> -Use the 2.95.x series for reliability (not <A HREF="gcc-2.96-3.0.html">2.96</A>). +Use the 2.95.x series for reliability (not <A HREF="users_against_developers.html#gcc">2.96</A>). Use the latest gcc 3.0.x (starting at 3.0.2) if you want to use a 3.0.x version. </TD><TR><TD COLSPAN=3> </TD><TR> @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ <TD></TD><TD VALIGN=top><FONT CLASS="text">Q:</TD><TD WIDTH=100%><B><FONT CLASS="text"> Where can I find information about gcc 2.96 bugs? </B></TD><TR><TD></TD><TD VALIGN=top><FONT CLASS="text">A:</TD><TD><FONT CLASS="text"> -In <A HREF="gcc-2.96-3.0.html">this</A> document. And <A HREF="users_against_developers.html">this</A> +<A HREF="users_against_developers.html#gcc">This</A> document describes why Red Hat released 2.96 and other interesting things. </TD><TR><TD COLSPAN=3> </TD><TR> @@ -441,7 +441,8 @@ <TD></TD><TD VALIGN=top><FONT CLASS="text">Q:</TD><TD WIDTH=100%><B><FONT CLASS="text"> I have problems with [your window manager] and fullscreen xv/xmga/sdl/x11 modes ... </B></TD><TR><TD></TD><TD VALIGN=top><FONT CLASS="text">A:</TD><TD><FONT CLASS="text"> -Use the <CODE>-fsmode</CODE> switch. See example.conf or the man page. +Read the <A HREF="bugreports.html">bug reporting guidelines</A> and send us a +proper bug report. </TD><TR><TD COLSPAN=3> </TD><TR> <TD></TD><TD VALIGN=top><FONT CLASS="text">Q:</TD><TD WIDTH=100%><B><FONT CLASS="text"> @@ -690,7 +691,7 @@ Speed:<BR> This parameter can be computed easily: <OL> - <LI>Which movies do you plan to watch?</LI> + <LI>Which movies do you plan to watch? <UL> <LI><B>MPEG1:</B> 320x200@32=256000<BR> You need only 256*25fps=6.4MB/sec of bandwidth (This format can be played @@ -708,6 +709,7 @@ 32MB of video memory to watch this stream: 16MB for the RGB area and 16MB for the YUV area.</LI> </UL> + </LI> <LI>The bandwidth of PCI slots is: 33MHz*32Bit=133MB/sec. PCI2.1 has 66MHz*32Bit=266MB/sec which is more than enough for playing any movie (except HDTV streams which really require an AGP bus).</LI> @@ -717,6 +719,7 @@ <LI><B>DIMM</B> - Good if your video card has 128-bit memory access.</LI> <LI><B>DDR</B> - Is fast enough for all types.</LI> </UL> + </LI> </OL> Note: DGA comparison shows that there is no visible difference between video cards which have the same type of video memory installed.<BR>