# HG changeset patch # User gabucino # Date 1005945278 0 # Node ID 511f8eba46be8560c62978918a306e4f8cf187ec # Parent c3459dcd54acabe01b89201d7267804f89d8f659 Added pl's license text diff -r c3459dcd54ac -r 511f8eba46be DOCS/documentation.html --- a/DOCS/documentation.html Fri Nov 16 20:54:53 2001 +0000 +++ b/DOCS/documentation.html Fri Nov 16 21:14:38 2001 +0000 @@ -184,8 +184,10 @@ allowed to be distributed in binary form, and also contains the OpenDivX library which has special license. We are still developing towards GPL.
-For further information about licensing, check the second part of -this file.
+Distributing MPlayer in the form of binaries and/or binary packages +is currently impossible, speaking about both technical and law +areas. Detailed information can be found in the second part of this file, +and it is recommended to read it.
I didn't write any codecs, just some players. I spent a lot of time finding the best way to parse bad damaged input files diff -r c3459dcd54ac -r 511f8eba46be DOCS/users_against_developers.html --- a/DOCS/users_against_developers.html Fri Nov 16 20:54:53 2001 +0000 +++ b/DOCS/users_against_developers.html Fri Nov 16 21:14:38 2001 +0000 @@ -76,7 +76,34 @@
Tons of users asked us about this. For example Debian users tend to say: Oh,
I can apt-get install avifile
, why should I compile MPlayer ?
While this may sound reasonable, the problem lies a bit deeper than
-those-fuckin-MPlayer-developers-hate-gcc-2.96-and-RedHat-and-Debian.
+those-fuckin-MPlayer-developers-hate-gcc-2.96-and-RedHat-and-Debian.
Reasons: Law
+ +MPlayer describes the sourcecode. It contains several files with incompatible +licenses especially on the redistribution clauses. As source files, they are +allowed to coexist in a same project.
+ +Therefore, NEITHER BINARIES NOR BINARY PACKAGES OF MPlayer ARE ALLOWED TO EXIST SINCE +SUCH OBJECTS BREAK LICENSES. PEOPLE WHO DISTRIBUTE SUCH BINARY PACKAGES ARE +DOING ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES.
+ +So if you know somebody who maintains a binary package then forward her/him +this text and (ask him to) contact us. What (s)he is doing is illegal and IT IS +NO LONGER MPlayer, but his/her mplayer. If it breaks, it is +his/her fault. Don't come and cry on the MPlayer mailing lists, you will +most likely be blacklisted.
+ +For example that french guy called Christian Marillat who denied our +request, and is still distributing binary Debian packages of MPlayer, +despite the fact that there was at least one user who downloaded it and failed +(of course compiling from source helped him). And there is Guillaume +Rousse, who is doing the same, but making RPMs for Mandrake. Do not support +criminals!
+ +Reasons: Technical
+ +