# HG changeset patch
# User corey
# Date 1208719587 0
# Node ID 83fdf3030da728f8c18ed225887ee96f90a7456d
# Parent 586d7ee3c10604421920d2b2273035c0100e27cb
add better information about inverse-telecining with vf_filmdint
diff -r 586d7ee3c106 -r 83fdf3030da7 DOCS/xml/en/encoding-guide.xml
--- a/DOCS/xml/en/encoding-guide.xml Sun Apr 20 16:06:41 2008 +0000
+++ b/DOCS/xml/en/encoding-guide.xml Sun Apr 20 19:26:27 2008 +0000
@@ -2245,6 +2245,23 @@
-->
+ is similar to
+ : both filters attempt to match a pair of
+ fields to form a complete frame. will
+ deinterlace individual fields that it cannot match, however, whereas
+ will simply drop them. Also, the two filters
+ have separate detection code, and filmdint may tend to match fields a
+ bit less often. Which filter works better may depend on the input
+ video and personal taste; feel free to experiment with fine-tuning
+ the filters' options if you encounter problems with either one (see
+ the man page for details). For most well-mastered input video,
+ however, both filters work quite well, so either one is a safe choice
+ to start with.
+
+mencoder dvd://1 -oac copy -vf filmdint -ovc lavc -ofps 24000/1001
+
+
An older method
is to, rather than inverse-telecine the telecined parts, telecine
the non-telecined parts and then inverse-telecine the whole
@@ -2258,18 +2275,6 @@
-
- I have not used myself, but here is what
- D Richard Felker III has to say:
-
-
It is OK, but IMO it tries to deinterlace rather
- than doing inverse telecine too often (much like settop DVD
- players & progressive TVs) which gives ugly flickering and
- other artifacts. If you are going to use it, you at least need to
- spend some time tuning the options and watching the output first
- to make sure it is not messing up.
-