# HG changeset patch
# User gpoirier
# Date 1133810448 0
# Node ID 9722eecad127d5d381cd05b2e6ba1cb2983a7701
# Parent 85a668c410ec994307c29901e88a8f5b6e88d4ea
fixes suggested by The Wanderer and Corey
diff -r 85a668c410ec -r 9722eecad127 DOCS/xml/en/encoding-guide.xml
--- a/DOCS/xml/en/encoding-guide.xml Mon Dec 05 17:52:00 2005 +0000
+++ b/DOCS/xml/en/encoding-guide.xml Mon Dec 05 19:20:48 2005 +0000
@@ -1045,7 +1045,7 @@
The following steps will guide you in computing the resolution of your
encode without distorting the video too much, by taking into account several
- information about the souce video.
+ types of information about the source video.
First, you should compute the encoded aspect ratio:
ARc = (Wc x (ARa / PRdvd )) / Hc
@@ -1095,13 +1095,13 @@
image; if there are not enough bits, the edges of those blocks are
visible.)
It is therefore wise to take a CQ ranging from 0.20 to 0.22 for a 1 CD rip,
- and 0.26-0.28 for 2 CDs with standard encoding options.
+ and 0.26-0.28 for 2 CDs rip with standard encoding options.
More advanced encoding options such as those listed here for
libavcodec
and
XviD
should make it possible to get the same quality with CQ ranging from
- 0.18 to 0.20 for a 1 CD rip, and 0.24-0.26 for 2 CDs
+ 0.18 to 0.20 for a 1 CD rip, and 0.24-0.26 for 2 CDs rip.
With MPEG-4 ASP codecs such as x264,
you can use a CQ ranging from 0.14 to 0.16 with standard encoding options,
and should be able to go as low as 0.10 to 0.12 with
@@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@
On the other hand, it is worthless to raise CQ higher than 0.30 as you would
be wasting bits without any noticeable quality gain.
Also note that as mentioned earlier in this guide, low resolution videos
- need a bigger CQ (compared to for ex. DVD-resolution) to look good.
+ need a bigger CQ (compared to for instance DVD-resolution) to look good.
@@ -2559,7 +2559,7 @@
Very high quality
-
+ 6fps0dB