Mercurial > mplayer.hg
changeset 2440:3b792a1d0fc2
hmm. am I a doxwriter?
author | arpi |
---|---|
date | Wed, 24 Oct 2001 02:26:49 +0000 |
parents | 022a7e7fec2d |
children | f8352ff67ef7 |
files | DOCS/gcc-2.96-3.0.html |
diffstat | 1 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/DOCS/gcc-2.96-3.0.html Wed Oct 24 02:26:49 2001 +0000 @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +<HTML> +<BODY BGCOLOR=WHITE> + +<P> +<B>Question:</B> What is the problem with GCC 2.96 ? And with 3.x ? +</P> + +<P> +<B>Answer:</B> +</P> + +<P> +And for the people, who periodically asks what are the exact problems with +gcc 2.96, my answer: <I>we don't know.</I> We just see various bugreports mostly +gcc internal bugs, compiler syntax errors in source or bad code compiled. They +all are solved using different version of gcc. I understand that gcc 2.96 +has different default optimization flags and they conflicts with our inline +asm code, but we can't fix them, and we really don't want to fix them as they +work with other compilers or gcc versions, and the fix may cause speed loss. +</P> + +<P> +I think that the gcc 2.96 should be fixed to be option-compatible with other +releases, but redhat guys refused to do it. If someone interested - ask +Eugene K., avifile author, he has a long mailing with them, because they had +the same problems with avifile. Finally he changed avifile source to +<I>workaround</I> gcc 2.96 bugs... +We simply has no interest and time to do it. +</P> + +<P> +Ah, and about the pipe-in-comment bug: it wasn't really our bug. +I've talked one of gcc maintainers, and he told me that gcc 2.96 and 3.x +supports intel asm syntax, and it caused the pipe bug. But it was a bug, +because gcc silently, without any warning, ignored the whole asm block. +*They* have fixed that, now it prints warning and doesn't skip the block. +(at least he told me, i didn't checked) +</P> + +<P> +Other gcc 3.x problems comes from broken libstdc++ or glibc header (std_*.h) +installation. They are not our fault. MPlayer compiles and works well with +gcc 3.x versions. <B>Only 2.96 is broken</B>, but it depends on many environment +elements, including gcc 2.96 release number, enabled mplayer features, etc. +<I>If it works for you using gcc 2.96, it doesn't mean it will work for everyone.</I> +</P> + +</BODY> +</HTML>