Mercurial > mplayer.hg
changeset 16295:567c3d5da0ca
More typos. One noticed by Nico. Added an empty line at the end to make syncmail happy
| author | gpoirier |
|---|---|
| date | Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:22:13 +0000 |
| parents | c43d55a452c8 |
| children | e0a4ab62b469 |
| files | DOCS/tech/swscaler_methods.txt |
| diffstat | 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/DOCS/tech/swscaler_methods.txt Tue Aug 23 16:12:39 2005 +0000 +++ b/DOCS/tech/swscaler_methods.txt Tue Aug 23 16:22:13 2005 +0000 @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ acceptable: (fast)bilinear, area ok: others -aliassing (only downscale) +aliasing (only downscale) straight lines look like staircases areas of high detail look worse regular patterns turn into a funny looking mess (moire patterns) @@ -26,23 +26,23 @@ bad: point ok: others -recommanditions: (based upon my personal oppinion many ppl might disagree ...) +recommendations: (based upon my personal opinion many ppl might disagree ...) --------------------------------------------------------------------- -the recomanded scalers for upscaling: +the recommended scalers for upscaling: fast_bilinear, point if speed is important cubic, spline, lanczos if quality is important -the recomanded scalers for downscaling: +the recommended scalers for downscaling: fast_bilinear, point if speed is important gauss, bilinear if quality is important cubic, spline, lanczos if a sharper picture is important note: when encoding at a limited amount of bits (not constant quantizer) -then a slightly blured input might look better after decoding than a slightly -sharpend one, especially for lower bitrates +then a slightly blurred input might look better after decoding than a slightly +sharpened one, especially for lower bitrates -sws numbers / names / artefact types +sws numbers / names / artifact types ------------------------------------------------------------------------- r ringing b blurry @@ -66,3 +66,4 @@ Notes: area upscale is identical to bilinear +